What you say makes a lot of sense, and in fact, until recently I thought like you, but now I have my doubts. If we look at it solely from a profitability standpoint, then yes, it would be. But one characteristic of inflation hedges is that they at least maintain their value, if not rise, when there is conflict, and over the last year we have seen that this is not the case. The most recent example is Trump's statements last week about Greenland, saying he would impose tariffs on anyone who opposed him. This caused Bitcoin and the US stock market to fall, while gold broke records once again.
If we only consider profitability, we could also say that the Nasdaq 100 is a hedge against inflation, because if you had invested those $100 15 years ago, today you would have $1,100.
Bitcoin right now have the characteristic that is similar to stock. It thrive on a good sentiment market with economic stability. Even though stock market is falling, stock is still considered as a good and reliable long-term hedge against inflation because the current fall is nothing but temporary.
Same thing with bitcoin and the recent market that feels delayed to gold. Truth is, gold keep rallying because people are afraid to put money into a bit riskier asset and the phenomenal growth that gold is having causes chain effect to attract people into investing more. It seems the word
hedge against inflation of today is more like everything that doesn't just go down endlessly and bitcoin is one of them.