Bitcoin Forum
January 24, 2026, 11:06:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin as a "digital gold" analogue  (Read 38 times)
Kokkomaki (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 23, 2026, 11:20:22 AM
 #1

(Published first at my blog: https://kokkomaki.com/2026/01/19/bitcoin-as-a-digital-gold-analogue/

Hi Bitcointak people. I wrote this piece in my blog. I have been an avid bitcoiner since 2017/2018. I'd like to contribute to the ongoing discussion here, albeit I am not yet sure how I am being welcomed here. As such, I am looking forward to seeing discussion, debate and so on. Before I tried to write in r/Bitcoin in Reddit, but the atmosphere seems somewhat hostile for some reason. Is it the same thing here? In any case, here is something I wrote. I am also looking forward to networking with likeminded people. So let me know if you'd like to getting to know me more. Do also have a look on my blog/journal, where I write about multitude of things, including Bitcoin.

---

To the post:

Probably the first time Bitcoin was called "digital gold" was back in 2010 in BitcoinTalk internet forum by a user named "jimbobway"[1]. A decade later it is touted in many news articles.

The similarities are striking. Gold and Bitcoin share notable characteristics: both are stereotypically durable, fungible, and scarce. (Stereotypically, because there are big differences, so it is not one-to-one comparison.) But Bitcoin has distinct advantages over physical gold. It can be divided to extraordinary decimal places, cryptographically verified without risk of counterfeiting, and transported instantaneously across borders. Gold requires vaults, armoured transport, and physical verification.

Not to mention Bitcoin lives in the internet and is hence programmable. This is a very cool aspect in the long run, as new applications are built using Bitcoin's aforementioned features as their backbone.

Minimally speaking, Bitcoin requires only the memorisation of twelve words. Read it again: Twelve words and you are your own "Swiss bank", as Barack Obama once said. Of course, not everyone will want to remember the twelve words, so one holds their bitcoin in their own  - paper, hardware, or software - wallet by themselves. Or, they hand over their bitcoin to someone who will take care of that for them.

However, "digital gold" is an analogue, and as such susceptible to error, if taken to far greater lengths than the analogue may warrant for.

For one, Bitcoin "mining" is not the same thing as gold mining. Bitcoin "mining" uses the same word as gold mining, but it's actually totally different - miners are not extracting anything physical from the ground. The term "mining" is borrowed because it captures the same idea of competing to find something scarce, but in reality, Bitcoin miners are providing a service of validating transactions rather than digging up resources.

Secondly, gold has more use-cases than bitcoin, for example industrial applications. However, bitcoin is in this juxtaposition then highly specialised in store-of-value and medium-of-exchange functions (or at the very least may potentially become; currently contested, not to mention unit-of-account). Moreover, while Bitcoin serves secondary functions - time-stamping documents[2], acting as a flexible electrical load on power grids[3], and providing usable waste heat from mining operations[4] - these do not generate the persistent demand across industries that gold enjoys.

Notwithstanding, Bitcoin is perceived and understood as "digital gold" by some and by many. This is evidenced by the U.S starting a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve[5] (although it includes other crypto-assets, too), Bhutan[6] quietly mining bitcoin, El Salvador buying bitcoin, Central African Republic assigning bitcoin as a legal tender, and European banks slowly waking up to the fact, notably the Czech central bank[7]. There are other nation-states also that own Bitcoin[8].

There are some studies already that contend that Bitcoin could be a hedge (like gold) against geopolitical uncertainties. One study finds that gold functions as a more reliable hedge and safe haven for people living in 'BRICS plus' countries during market crises, while Bitcoin offers diversification benefits primarily in normal market conditions with limited and country-specific crisis protection[9].

In another study, authors demonstrate that both Bitcoin and gold function as safe havens during high geopolitical risk periods, though their protective effectiveness varies depending on the specific type of geopolitical threat[10].

So described, given the emerging evidence of Bitcoin's safe-haven properties during specific geopolitical risk scenarios, central banks of their respective countries may also benefit from considering modest Bitcoin allocations alongside their traditional reserves.

Following BlackRock's framework,[11] a 1-2% allocation to Bitcoin would contribute similarly to portfolio risk as holdings in major tech stocks while providing a distinct source of return uncorrelated with traditional risk assets. Though such risks differ if one is a nation-state, a central bank, a private enterprise, or an individual. Accordingly and naturally allocation differs.

In conclusion, "digital gold" or not, Bitcoin does succeed in its own category that defies the previously-thought schemas. Bitcoin has differing qualities that could make it an increasingly attractive asset to own, even for nation-states. If Bitcoin is enticing for countries, why not for you?

References

[1]
jimbobway. (2010, August 6). Bitcoin as digital gold [Forum post]. BitcoinTalk.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=733.msg7939#msg7939

[2]
SimpleProof. (2026, January 16). SimpleProof. https://www.simpleproof.com/ and
OpenTimestamps. (2026, January 16). OpenTimestamps. https://opentimestamps.org/

[3]
Klee, M. (2022, November 1). Demand Response And Curtailment Through Bitcoin Mining. OBM.
https://obm.io/blog/demand-response/

[4]
Asgari, N., McDonald, M. T., & Pearce, J. M. (2023). Energy Modeling and Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of Greenhouses for Tomato Cultivation Utilizing the Waste Heat of Cryptocurrency Miners. Energies, 16(3), 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031331

[5]
The White House. (2025, March 6). Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/establishment-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-united-states-digital-asset-stockpile/

[6]
Lamsang, T. (2023, April 30). DHI confirms that it is mining digital assets. The Bhutanese.
https://thebhutanese.bt/dhi-confirms-that-it-is-mining-digital-assets/

[7]
Zimmerman, M. (2025, November 13). Czech bank buys $1 million in Bitcoin. Bitcoin Magazine.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/czech-bank-buys-1-million-in-bitcoin

[8]
Bitcoin Treasuries. (2026, January 16). Governments holding Bitcoin.
https://bitcointreasuries.net/governments

[9]
Belguith, R., Alnafisah, H., Manzli, Y. S., & Jeribi, A. (2025). Bitcoin and gold as hedges during geopolitical risk. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2486677

[10]
Selmi, R., Bouoiyour, J., & Wohar, M. E. (2022). Safe haven properties of Bitcoin and gold. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 76, 101487.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0275531921001331

[11]
Cohen, S., Henderson, P., Mitchnick, R., & Paul, V. (2024, December). Investment perspectives: Sizing bitcoin in portfolios. BlackRock Investment Institute.
https://www.blackrock.com/gls-download/literature/whitepaper/bii-investment-perspectives-december-2024.pdf
Alpha Marine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 541



View Profile
January 23, 2026, 01:29:39 PM
 #2

Before I tried to write in r/Bitcoin in Reddit, but the atmosphere seems somewhat hostile for some reason. Is it the same thing here?

In every gathering of more than 100 people from different backgrounds, ethnicities, races, religions, and all, there is bound to be at least one or two toxic people, but as a whole, this is not a toxic place. Just follow the rules of the forum, learn what you don't know and apply what you know.
And if someone says something to you in a rude or condescending way that hurts, don't see it as "the forum". One or two accounts don't make up the whole forum.

In future, you don't need to copy and paste the whole content of your article from your blog. You can post the link of the article and summarise the content of the article, if you must.
You can also quote a part of the block in this way;
Quote
The similarities are striking. Gold and Bitcoin share notable characteristics: both are stereotypically durable, fungible, and scarce. (Stereotypically, because there are big differences, so it is not one-to-one comparison.) But Bitcoin has distinct advantages over physical gold. It can be divided to extraordinary decimal places, cryptographically verified without risk of counterfeiting, and transported instantaneously across borders. Gold requires vaults, armoured transport, and physical verification.
This way, people can preview the content of the article and visit the site if they want to read more about it.


███████▄▄███▄███▄
███▄▄████████▌██
▄█████████████▐██▌
██▄███████████▌█▌
███████▀██████▐▌█
██████████████▌▌▐
████████▄███████▐▐
█████████████████
███████████████▄██▄
██████████████▀▀▀
█████▀███▀▀▀

▄▄▄██████▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
███████████████████████████
███▌█████▀███▌█████▀▀███████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███▌█████▄███▌█████▄███▐███████████████████▄
▐████████████▀███████▄██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▀
▐████████████▄██▄███████████▌█████████▄████▀
▐█████████▀█████████▌█████████████▄▄████▀
██████████▄███████████▐███▌██▄██████▀
██████████████▀███▐███▌██████████████████████
████▀██████▀▀█████████▌███▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▌
 
      P R E M I E R   B I T C O I N   C A S I N O   &   S P O R T S B O O K      

█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  98%  
RTP

 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀

█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

 HIGH 
ODDS

 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀
 
..PLAY NOW..
Ucy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 3122
Merit: 422


Ucy is d only acct I use on this forum.& I'm alone


View Profile
January 23, 2026, 06:48:00 PM
 #3

I think the phrase is more suitable for gold-backed virtual token.
And such token could exist on the Bitcoin network as colored coin making it less superior to Bitcoin currency. If this already exist on other crypto networks, they still owe that to Bitcoin where the blockchains were copied from. This should serve as proof how incredibly important and useful Bitcoin is. The usefulness is not only on Bitcoin Network but other networks that depend on Bitcoin technology.
And it's also important to note that we are more concerned about cyberworld at the moment. So we need a currency/system that serves as alternative to centralized financial system on the internet. This is why Bitcoin is more suitable/superior, while gold maybe more suitable in the physical world even with no internet. So, our priority is the right online alternative to centralized financial system. And thereafter we will move more to physical alternatives that fully serve as proper money. Or we could use multiple alternatives to complement one another or for roles the others are incapable of serving...example, more divisible and cheaper physical alternatives to gold
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!