I agree with you on alot, even your title on this post had me wondering what you had to say. Because we all have been stupid when it comes to Cryptocurrency
.
Lets be real people who buy coins like hawk tuah are just gambling or trolling around buying it.
About the drugs part, i believe till this day people do buy and sell their drugs through cryptocurrencies, i once read on a forum where a dealer mentioned that he was using cryptocurrencies to ''clean'' his money somehow.
For the people who pay to watch ''R*t*rd-P*rn'' , i would never understand such things like that. Got no words for that.
And after you said '' I have been working on this problem by making cryptocurrency mining solve the most important scientific problem,'' im wondering you must be some kind of technical researcher or engineer, what is it you do exactly if you dont mind me asking?
I appreciate the kind remarks and interest.
I have created the cryptocurrency Circcash which is the cryptocurrency where mining is meant to be performed using energy efficient reversible (most likely adiabatic) computation. I am a mathematician, and I figured out a way to design a mining algorithm so that
1. it requires a very low level of cryptographic security,
2. it quickly incorporates confusion and diffusion so that it easily attains a high level of cryptographic security, and
3. it is easy to evaluate without bias the level of cryptographic security.
With that being said, I plan to update Circcash's mining algorithm soon, but I would like to talk to the reversible computing engineers, and I have not heard back from them because they don't seem to realize that cryptocurrency mining is a nearly perfect problem for the first profitable energy efficient reversible computers.
Now I am the only one still mining Circcash because everyone is interested in only Hawk Tuah garbage and things like that. They will therefore fall for scams over and over again and become stupider and stupider, and nearly everyone who I attempt to communicate with only says the most stupid shit imaginable; just look at how BADecker communicates.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
