It’s Time to Call Out the Hypocrites Poisoning Our Forum

[Kazkaz27]

Along with your inability to take accountability for your own actions, you are also incapable of basic reading comprehension.  Perhaps deliberately?  You take one specific thing I said and divert all attention from the primary subject of my post.

The truth of the matter is my initial communications to you were polite and informative.  You played this same game of diversion from the start, causing me to lose patience with you.  You proceeded to red-tag me for something completely irrelevant and not at all deserving of a red-tag.  Essentially, you've proven anonymousminer's accusations against you are 100% accurate.  If you're attempted diversion tactics are deliberate and not due to a lack of reading comprehension, you're also demonstrating typical scammer behavior.

I’m fully transparent and accountable. All accusations from anonymousminer — and the ones you’re now mimicking — have been addressed in detail across multiple threads.

You came into my thread, repeatedly skirted the actual questions, and refused to engage with the core challenge this discussion is about, while behaving almost identically to anonymousminer. You accuse me of diversion tactics yet are employing them yourself.

Everyone can see this.

[Vod]

The biggest hypocrite on the forum is Oggy.   I wonder if he is nursing a hangover from his night of drunken edits.    As we identify other scammers, it's important to recognize the original.

[Kazkaz27]

The biggest hypocrite on the forum is Oggy.   I wonder if he is nursing a hangover from his night of drunken edits.    As we identify other scammers, it's important to recognize the original.

Respectfully, please do not derail this thread with your feud.

I encourage you to address the questions and contribute to this honest discussion by engaging with the challenge. That is the sole intent with which I invited members to participate.

Otherwise, please create your own thread to invite others, as I have done, to discuss those topics.

[DireWolfM14]

refused to engage with the core challenge

The "core challenge" seems to be you wrapping your pea brain around the question of whether it's a good idea for people to use keys generated by others.

Everyone can see this.

Indeed.

The rest of this meander dialogue of bullshit streaming from your keyboard is evidence of you doing the exact opposite of what you claim; i.e. taking accountability for YOUR actions.  You repeatedly divert from the fact these discussions are not about me and my reputation.  They are about you and your actions.

You think your red tag hurts me?  You aren't on DT, and I can assure you that you'll never be.  Your red-tag is as meaningless as those of the countless other scammers who've desperately retaliated when I exposed their scams.

[Kazkaz27]

refused to engage with the core challenge

The "core challenge" seems to be you wrapping your pea brain around the question of whether it's a good idea for people to use keys generated by others.

Everyone can see this.

Indeed.

The rest of this meander dialogue of bullshit streaming from your keyboard is evidence of you doing the exact opposite of what you claim; i.e. taking accountability for YOUR actions.  You repeatedly divert from the fact these discussions are not about me and my reputation.  They are about you and your actions.

You think your red tag hurts me?  You aren't on DT, and I can assure you that you'll never be.  Your red-tag is as meaningless as those of the countless other scammers who've desperately retaliated when I exposed their scams.

With approximately 752,000 active users on Bitcointalk.org (based on profiles that have logged in within the last 90 days).

I am ranked 533 on the DT1-election: Rank up pipeline list. I think that is pretty OK.

https://loyce.club/trust/ranking/

I’d say it’s not really worth addressing you, as I’ve already illustrated that you have no desire to engage with the topic but rather aspire to derail this post with disingenuous tactics and accusations.

Please address the topic or create your own thread to pursue your agenda and refrain from derailing others’ legitimate topics.

As a DT1 member yourself, you really should adhere to a higher standard. You continue to prove my points with your disingenuous engagement.

[memehunter]

You ask some good questions. 

I wonder how many are AI chatbot inspired and how many are originals?

[Kazkaz27]

You ask some good questions.

I wonder how many are AI chatbot inspired and how many are originals?

I believe members here are hesitant to answer these questions honestly, as doing so would fundamentally shift how the forum elects or removes its leaders. It would no longer be a mere popularity contest where leaders can act or speak without consequence. Instead, it would hold DT1 members to a higher standard, making them accountable and dismantling the cliques that have proliferated through egregious, unchecked misconduct by those who abuse their privileged status. It may even provoke backlash, much like what I’ve experienced—a common response when challenging corruption, standing up to those in power, and advocating for a shift in authority by exposing flaws in the powerful or the system itself.

The failure to address these questions and the deliberate avoidance of doing so serve as evidence of complicity. Members who cannot honestly answer these questions are acting disingenuously or protecting the status quo, which, as I’ve illustrated, encourages egregious, unchecked misconduct by those who abuse their privileged status.

Please, let’s encourage open responses to the initial questions in this topic to move the discussion forward.

Answering these questions truthfully would ultimately shed light on key issues and lead to a positive shift in forum dynamics, discussions, and relationships.

I believe that if members are courageous and can stand alone in their beliefs—without regard to the hierarchy, knowing what is right versus what is wrong—these questions would have clear answers.