CRASH/ AVIATOR: Biggest mistakes.

[casey15]

From my analysis, I've seen. That crash/àviator has made people lose  more money than in sports betting. A friend if mine will always say that when you play it you are literally and they are literally showing your money flying away. I've really never liked the game and with the negative reviews I've heard all around, I just stay away from it.
Sometimes too I discovered that players may also be greedy because tell me why you stake $1 and you have done about 35X on a flight, why then are you still waiting for 100X. That is greediness and that makes them lose money .I really can't say much about it until I have played and experience it myself... I'll come back to this thread to share my experience

[Hispo]

-Waiting for an early crash and go all in on the next round: Basically, I would wait for several rounds until the multiplier crashed on x1.01, and then gamble heavily on the next one, believing there would be a "balance" which I could take advantage of. In the end, it would be just a faster way to lose money.

This is probably one of the most common things among gamblers. I have done it myself plenty of times when I still had some balance left. I waited for a few low multipliers and then placed one bet hoping to catch at least a 2x. Sadly, this kind of thinking is really bad and most of the time it just does not work. 

A lot of people think that after several low multipliers, a higher one like 1.5x or 2x is due to appear, but nothing is guaranteed. Crash games are purely luck based, and that is why I rarely play them anymore.

Well. It makes me feel a little better to know I am not the only person who thought it could be doable, to fool the random number generator of the casino.

Usually, gamblers believe on the existence of disbalances on casino games. Like for example, when roulettes give red several times in a row and people decide to bet on black, believing their chances to score a win get higher when which red result it is drawn out the roulette.

[michellee]

Playing crash will be the way losing money faster if you can't controls your greediness. You will see the multiplier running and if your greediness increase and you want bigger winning, you will not stop the multiplier before hit the number you want.

But if you can accept any multiplier and not chasing bigger multiplier, you may saves yourself from the doom. I feels bad in the past losing money playing crash but that doesn't made me chasing my lost. Playing crash needs luck and good controls to stop yourself chasing the win.

[nimogsm]

Playing crash will be the way losing money faster if you can't controls your greediness. You will see the multiplier running and if your greediness increase and you want bigger winning, you will not stop the multiplier before hit the number you want.

But if you can accept any multiplier and not chasing bigger multiplier, you may saves yourself from the doom. I feels bad in the past losing money playing crash but that doesn't made me chasing my lost. Playing crash needs luck and good controls to stop yourself chasing the win.

Unfortunately, there is no winning strategy in such games. You can play for a long time with a minimum multiplier, but sooner or later your initial bet will be lost. Of course, you can play 2-3 games and come out with a small profit, but in the next games, the player will still end up with nothing. You are right that such games are designed to exploit the player's greed. They are quite dynamic, and you can quickly get carried away and lose your entire deposit.

[Pmalek]

I am guilty of doing something similar to OP, but instead of waiting for one early crash before betting on the next round, I like to wait for two or three low multipliers. Especially if there is one or more in the 1.0x range. The strategy (if it can be called that) often works, but all it takes is one bad bet and you lose a significant part of your bankroll. There are no safe bets or working strategies in these games even if we think we found something that seems profitable for the time being.