Again, drop this dead, all this gibberish won't work on the secp256k1.
Your explanations are misleading, you are confusing people for nothing...
Yes, everything I've written has been purely for humorous purposes.But does that violate the rules? If not, let the fun continue. First, we introduce the characters. We're still in the "introduction" phase, and the exciting "development" part is just around the corner.You'll love it too.
I am confused how you are going to map points from the real curve to this anomaly curve when they have different P and N, and also they have different equations for points
Y^2 = X^3 + X + B mod P (anomaly)
Y^2 = X^3 + B mod P (secp256k1)
Yes, this is unusual!
If the method wasn't exactly the same, I could have immediately shared the code that does this in the Toy curve. However, the method that works in Toy and SECP256K1 is completely identical. The method is related to previous posts. Of course I will share it, but I'm currently following a specific order, not yet.
Probably because if that would be the case, it would break several proved theorems, like Fermat's or Lagrange's.
I'm already upset with Fermat anyway, no problem.
Legendre was also resentful towards Gauss.
Legendre correctly conjectured the quadratic reciprocity law (the relationship (p/q)(q/p) for odd primes p and q) in 1785 and made a major contribution, but his proof attempts in 1798 and 1808 were flawed.
The induction method was incomplete and contained circular reasoning in some prime pairs (especially those ≡3 mod 4), it created contradictions with the law itself.
Gauss refuted these errors and correctly proved it in 1796, making the law a cornerstone of number theory.
Legendre's conjectures were inspiring, but the proof went to Gauss.
Legendre was a better conjecturer than prover, Gauss was a prover.
Legendre presented flawed proofs for some things. Still, Legendre's legacy is great, even his errors advanced the field.
The X values are simply element identifiers, or tags, or colors, they have zero correlation to any cycle reindexing, which is always relative.
...
emoji/fruit/color
...
How to make fruit salad?
p=97
order==p values: [1, 3, 12, 85, 94, 96]
There was no practical way to find these values on large curves.
I won't reveal the secret method right now.
I'll just hint that salads can be made from fruits.
This recipe isn't in any cookbooks yet.
points where p==n: [1, 3, 12, 85, 94, 96]
#curve
p = 97
n = 103
a = 0
b = 26
base_x = 1
base_y = 30
Some of the layers on this curve are as follows:
p-fruit = (b value that makes p==n)
fruit salad:
48G=(96,92) ; 97−96=1
32G=(94,22) ; 97−94=3
28G=(85,74) ; 97−85=12
14G=(12,28) ; 97−12=85
42G=(3 ,76) ; 97−3=94
1G =(1 ,30) ; 97−1=96
✅ Thus, exactly: [1, 3, 12, 85, 94, 96] are obtained.
https://prnt.sc/1yxVjEB44ebRLook at the beauty of this picture! Are these fruits inedible?
Doesn't the inverse symmetry of the x-values and the b-values look amazing?
"Coordinate-Parameter Duality in Finite Fields":
This is a first. With this simple piece of information, we are bringing a new perspective to EC theory.
This was just the beginning.
The apocalyptic narrative will continue...
