This sounds less like a one off mistake and more like a pattern where risk controls are being selectively enforced in a way that shifts all downside to the player, especially with post approval odds changes. Inviting users to migrate, allowing play without proper verification, then tightening margins only at the moment of deposit seriously undermines trust and raises questions about fair dealing, regardless of the new license or branding. Have you documented the approvals, original odds, and timing of the margin changes in a way that could be independently reviewed by a regulator or mediator? Maybe you could also share that.
As a first step, I intend to apply to the UAE authorities. Based on what I understand, the company claims to have exited so-called “black markets” after obtaining a legal license in the UAE. I was invited to migrate to their new platform under this structure. Despite this, no proper KYC or verification process was carried out on my account. At the same time, the company appears to operate under an Estonian (EU) license as well.
The company cannot simply remove or deny the existence of internal records and databases on their side. The actions I experienced appear to stem from the decision of a sportsbook manager who acted in an extremely unprofessional and arbitrary manner, seemingly assuming he could apply rules selectively without consequences.
I was explicitly given the green light to deposit and place bets. However, immediately afterward, margins across many matches were raised to approximately 7–10%. It was only at that point that the representative appeared to realize how inappropriate the situation was. As seen in the conversations, multiple inconsistent explanations were then provided to justify the changes.
Regardless of those explanations, the damage had already been done. This behavior is unacceptable, and I believe it clearly demonstrates unfair and discriminatory treatment.
At this stage, I am determined to pursue and defend my legal rights.