CSNSTARS.COM Register now and get $20 FREE to play.

[bitbollo]

deposit requirement has no sense at all.
IF I have already win and I am ready to withdraw cash...how this deposit should create an issue for mult accounts?
They just deposit...and withdraw of course this not works... if I have won money, why I should you give first money for receiving it? It seems a non-sense... deposit doesn't has no change with farming accounts

The deposit requirement isn't about stopping farming after someone wins - it's about raising the barrier to entry before the farming starts.

Here's the logic:
- Without deposit requirement: Create 100 accounts with fake emails → play free $20 on each → if even 5 accounts hit something decent, profit
- With deposit requirement: You'd need to deposit $100 on each account that wins. Suddenly farming 100 accounts means risking $10,000+ just to extract bonus winnings

It filters out people who never intended to play seriously. If you win and don't want to deposit $100 to unlock it - fair enough, walk away. But for players who actually want to use the platform, it's a one-time verification that costs nothing if you continue playing.

Is it perfect? No. But it's more effective than no barrier at all. The alternative is no free bonus - which most casinos choose.

Short and easy question.
IF a player decides to deposit before withdrawal? LIke all people here in this topic, they get free 20 USD without nothing.
Ok How they can withdraw money? Since you are handling free 20 USD only to users that made request here... Why you need to add this rule?
NO one could even have such many accounts, would be pretty unreal....

@bettercrypto
Yes. Maybe OP doesn't know that this was a very old trick for scam users (at that time was called - verification ) ...

[gunhell16]

Short and easy question.
IF a player decides to deposit before withdrawal? LIke all people here in this topic, they get free 20 USD without nothing.
Ok How they can withdraw money? Since you are handling free 20 USD only to users that made request here... Why you need to add this rule?
NO one could even have such many accounts, would be pretty unreal....

I like this question; I’ll wait for OP's response regarding what you mentioned, dude. Here in our country, there are so many unscrupulous influencers promoting online gambling, and you can clearly tell that the majority of them are lying.

In their promotional ads, they claim that once anyone signs up, they’ll receive an equivalent of $20. They even say that even if you don't use the $20 free bonus,
you can withdraw it immediately. But when someone actually believes their content, the reality is that it’s not true at all.

[CONVOAI]

The deposit requirement isn't about stopping farming after someone wins - it's about raising the barrier to entry before the farming starts.

Here's the logic:
- Without deposit requirement: Create 100 accounts with fake emails → play free $20 on each → if even 5 accounts hit something decent, profit
- With deposit requirement: You'd need to deposit $100 on each account that wins. Suddenly farming 100 accounts means risking $10,000+ just to extract bonus winnings

It filters out people who never intended to play seriously. If you win and don't want to deposit $100 to unlock it - fair enough, walk away. But for players who actually want to use the platform, it's a one-time verification that costs nothing if you continue playing.

Is it perfect? No. But it's more effective than no barrier at all. The alternative is no free bonus - which most casinos choose.

I think you can verify with KYC instead of deposit. Because if a deposit is required while withdrawing, users take it as a negative and they lose interest in using the platform. So if verification is required, it would be better to verify in some other better way. Then it would be good for both the user and the casino. If someone opens 100 fake accounts, you can easily find out by checking the IP address.

[CSNstars]

Quote from: bitbollo on Today at 12:55:52 AM
> The deposit requirement isn't about stopping farming after someone wins - it's about raising the barrier to entry before the farming starts.
Exactly this.
To give you some real numbers: we've had over 90 signups so far, and not a single deposit. Zero. Every single one of them grabbed the free $20 and played with house money hoping to hit something and cash out.
@CONVOAI - KYC doesn't solve the problem. Someone can verify with real documents and still farm bonuses. Passing KYC doesn't mean someone intends to actually use the platform. A deposit means they have skin in the game.
The $100 requirement stays. Our casino, our rules. Most casinos don't offer free play at all - we're giving people a real chance to try the games before putting money in. If you win and don't want to deposit to unlock it, that's fine, no hard feelings. But we're not running a charity for bonus farmers.

[TiredMan]

Hi, could u add the 20$ ?

Username: FixShot

[CSNstars]

Hi, could u add the 20$ ?

Username: FixShot

Your accounts have been credited with $20 ✓

Enjoy and good luck!

- CSNSTARS Team

[iv4n]

Regarding the welcome bonus wagering: there is a mistake in the post you’re referring to — the wagering requirement is 100x, not 1000x. We agree that 1000x would be unreasonable, and we’ve already corrected this to avoid further confusion.

x100 is also unreasonable, it's like mission impossible... but I get it.

To give you some real numbers: we've had over 90 signups so far, and not a single deposit. Zero. Every single one of them grabbed the free $20 and played with house money hoping to hit something and cash out.

I am not surprised... 90 x $20 = $1800, and I am sure that money could be spent better and attract some real players. A few weeks of slot/wagering/other competitions, maybe some poker promotion where we need to deposit & wager some amount for the ticket. But I guess with this wagering requirement, you didn't spend anything... You just attracted a bunch of people who chase free monies. Make a nice deposit promotion with x20 wagering requirements, without max win/payout rules, and maybe you will attract some real players.

Good luck!

[BABY SHOES]

Your ANN banner shows many slot providers but after looking at the website I only see pragmatic providers... do you have to login first to see which providers are available?

x100 is also unreasonable, it's like mission impossible... but I get it.

100x wager? Woow, even us with 35x wagering requirement is difficult let alone this 100x.
Yeah though don't take it seriously because it's free money.

[bitbollo]

Quote from: bitbollo on Today at 12:55:52 AM
> The deposit requirement isn't about stopping farming after someone wins - it's about raising the barrier to entry before the farming starts.
Exactly this.
To give you some real numbers: we've had over 90 signups so far, and not a single deposit. Zero. Every single one of them grabbed the free $20 and played with house money hoping to hit something and cash out.
@CONVOAI - KYC doesn't solve the problem. Someone can verify with real documents and still farm bonuses. Passing KYC doesn't mean someone intends to actually use the platform. A deposit means they have skin in the game.
The $100 requirement stays. Our casino, our rules. Most casinos don't offer free play at all - we're giving people a real chance to try the games before putting money in. If you win and don't want to deposit to unlock it, that's fine, no hard feelings. But we're not running a charity for bonus farmers.

Again: Users in this topic are receiving free 20 USD.
If these users are able to fullfill 100x requirements and they can be able to withdraw ... 50 USD
Did you apply your rule? It means... they had to deposit 100 USD for withdraw this amount seen before = 50 USD ?
It has no sense. In both case, I mean even with an higher amount... I am surprised you don't see the irony in request to users a "deposit" in order to withdraw.
OF COURSE they will made a deposit if they can withdraw more of what they deposit.

[CSNstars]

Thank you for your feedback.

Our welcome bonus has wagering requirements to prevent abuse while still giving new players a genuine opportunity to explore our platform. The 100x requirement applies only to the bonus amount ($20), not deposits.

We understand this may not suit everyone's preferences. Players who prefer different terms are welcome to:
- Skip the bonus and deposit directly (no wagering requirements)
- Try our other promotions with lower requirements
- Contact support for alternative options

All terms are disclosed before claiming. We're always reviewing our offerings based on player feedback.

[hd49728]

Our welcome bonus has wagering requirements to prevent abuse while still giving new players a genuine opportunity to explore our platform. The 100x requirement applies only to the bonus amount ($20), not deposits.

So do your team separate user fund with their deposit and the bonus parts?
If you can do it, I believe that your users will feel more comfortably exploring your platforms with their deposits as well as claimed bonus. They will use deposits for bets and if they win, they can withdraw it without any wagering requirement.
If they bet with claimed bonus, they will have to wager it 100x times for eligible to withdraw it.

Separating two funds: own deposit fund, and claimed welcome bonus fund, would be very transparently and more easily managed for users.

[pavelmarty]

This is scama casino. I will write the details later. With video evidence.

[Youngrebel]

I also welcome you to the forum. You have a good looking announcement thread and the website home page is beautifully design but the image page suddenly disappeared and the login page appears when viewing the games of the website. Let your.plans beyond the announcement thread only if you want more visibility of their brand. A d you have made cleared explanation in the Op, all the deposit options are there. You would have added fiat deposit for the options.
Many gamblers like to deposit with Fiat because it is more accessible and easy for them to deposit. It they have small funds in their accounts, they can fund their gambling account and start playing games.

[Vaculin]

This is scama casino. I will write the details later. With video evidence.

You should be careful, because accusations like that are very serious, and when they’re coming from a newbie, they’re even more questionable.
And the OP has been active here, so he should be able to respond and address whatever accusation you’re making.

This is the right board for accusations by the way https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

[Hypnosis00]

On marketing strategy:
We're currently focused on:
- Building presence here on Bitcointalk
- Growing our X/Twitter community (@CasinoStarsX)
- Discord community for direct player engagement
- Word of mouth through fair play and fast payouts
- Marketing Campaigns via PRs emails, Forums, Telegram groups etc.
We're a lean team prioritizing product quality over heavy marketing spend. Our goal is to let the platform speak for itself - fast withdrawals, provably fair games, and a smooth user experience.

Branding and visibility are definitely areas we're investing in as we grow. Appreciate the honest feedback - it helps us improve.

What aspects of branding do you think are most important for building trust in this space?

That's great. Using all the media outlets could help a lot. But please never expect it to happen overnight. It is a long battle, you know. And it is much more efficient if you hire people to promote your project as well. In fact, this is already the trend, and it is one factor in the success.

I believe that the casino had already planned it. It will cost a lot, but the return is sweet and promising. I know there are a lot of things to work on on your site. Keep going.

But there are two important things that a casino must have.
 -transparency
 -consistency

[CSNstars]

Quote from: pavelmarty on February 05, 2026, 06:18:15 PM

This is scama casino. I will write the details later. With video evidence.

Accusations of this nature are serious and should be supported with evidence. If you believe you have proof, please present it in the Scam Accusations board so it can be reviewed properly. We will respond to any documented claims. Unsupported statements without evidence do not help users assess risk.

Quote from: Youngrebel on February 05, 2026, 07:04:16 PM

You have a good looking announcement thread and the website home page is beautifully design but the image page suddenly disappeared and the login page appears when viewing the games of the website.
Many gamblers like to deposit with Fiat because it is more accessible.

Thank you for the constructive feedback. The login redirect when accessing games is intentional, as gameplay requires authentication, but we agree the transition can be improved for clarity. This is being reviewed.

Regarding fiat deposits, we understand the accessibility benefits. Crypto is our primary focus at this stage, but fiat options are on the roadmap and will be evaluated carefully due to compliance and infrastructure requirements.

Quote from: Vaculin on February 05, 2026, 10:21:56 PM

You should be careful, because accusations like that are very serious.

Agreed. This is why we encourage proper use of the Scam Accusations board and evidence-based discussion. Transparency works both ways.

Quote from: Hypnosis00 on February 05, 2026, 11:41:05 PM

But there are two important things that a casino must have.
transparency
consistency

We agree completely.

To clarify the welcome bonus mechanics once more for transparency:

The 100x wagering requirement applies only to the $20 bonus, not to user deposits. Deposited funds are wagered normally, and winnings generated from deposits are withdrawable without bonus wagering requirements.

A suggestion was made earlier about clearly separating deposited funds and bonus funds in the user balance. This is valid feedback and is being reviewed as a possible UI improvement to make fund usage clearer for users.

Our current priorities are platform stability, fast withdrawals, provably fair games, and consistent user experience. Marketing will remain secondary to product reliability.

Constructive feedback is welcome. Claims should be supported with evidence so they can be evaluated objectively.

[impulse709]

The deposit requirement isn't about stopping farming after someone wins - it's about raising the barrier to entry before the farming starts.

Here's the logic:
- Without deposit requirement: Create 100 accounts with fake emails → play free $20 on each → if even 5 accounts hit something decent, profit
- With deposit requirement: You'd need to deposit $100 on each account that wins. Suddenly farming 100 accounts means risking $10,000+ just to extract bonus winnings

It filters out people who never intended to play seriously. If you win and don't want to deposit $100 to unlock it - fair enough, walk away. But for players who actually want to use the platform, it's a one-time verification that costs nothing if you continue playing.

Is it perfect? No. But it's more effective than no barrier at all. The alternative is no free bonus - which most casinos choose.

I think you can verify with KYC instead of deposit. Because if a deposit is required while withdrawing, users take it as a negative and they lose interest in using the platform. So if verification is required, it would be better to verify in some other better way. Then it would be good for both the user and the casino. If someone opens 100 fake accounts, you can easily find out by checking the IP address.

I see the rationale behind the deposit requirement of CSNstars it is supposed to discourage people who want to farm the free bonus of 20 on many false accounts. It would be so simple to make tens of accounts and get bonuses without needing any barrier. The deposit to use the system makes exploitation of the system an expensive process and minimizes casual exploiters. This can however be better. KYC, IP checks or phone/email checks might be used to prevent farming without real players having to deposit initially therefore making the process easier to the actual users and still keeping the platform secure.

[giack44]

I just registered, can I grab the 20 as test? Username Is G*****an i obscured the rest for privacy reasons but you surely can find me

[The Cryptovator]

On the announcement thread:
You're right - we're working on improving the presentation. Will look into getting a more professional design for the OP.

I think it should improve more, yet not looks gorgeous.

On KYC/AML:
We operate as a crypto-only platform. No KYC is required for standard play. Our terms are being updated to make this clearer. We believe in privacy-first gaming while maintaining responsible practices.

Still, there is no policy about KYC and AML, just now back from your website's policy. Can you please quote here if I am missing that KYC policy? We often welcome non-KYC gambling platforms, but they shouldn't be a backdoor to wipe gamblers' funds. A crypto-only platform would operate even without KYC implementation, but I'm not sure how long you would do so due to the regulation barrier.

On marketing strategy:
We're currently focused on:
- Building presence here on Bitcointalk

We're a lean team prioritizing product quality over heavy marketing spend. Our goal is to let the platform speak for itself - fast withdrawals, provably fair games, and a smooth user experience.

Branding and visibility are definitely areas we're investing in as we grow. Appreciate the honest feedback - it helps us improve.

Building presence on the forum would draw attention from the forum gamblers; I think it's a good strategy. And also the quality keeps a major role in the gambling industry; gamblers will prefer each other when they get a better service like smooth gambling, withdrawal and deposit.

What aspects of branding do you think are most important for building trust in this space?

Building trust on the forum: always support forum gamblers whenever they face any issues with your platform. Solve them as soon as possible unless they abuse the system. To build trust on the overall platform, you should run your business smoothly; especially your withdrawal and support system should be as fast as possible.

This is scama casino. I will write the details later. With video evidence.

This is a serious allegation, you should provide more details to backed your claim.

[hd49728]

On KYC/AML:
We operate as a crypto-only platform. No KYC is required for standard play. Our terms are being updated to make this clearer. We believe in privacy-first gaming while maintaining responsible practices.

Still, there is no policy about KYC and AML, just now back from your website's policy. Can you please quote here if I am missing that KYC policy? We often welcome non-KYC gambling platforms, but they shouldn't be a backdoor to wipe gamblers' funds. A crypto-only platform would operate even without KYC implementation, but I'm not sure how long you would do so due to the regulation barrier.

KYC or not, it must be written clearly in the ToS as if it is not clearly written there, the company can use a KYC card, pull it out anytime against their users. Users will have very big disadvantage when the casino tries to hide KYC card in their terms, not written clearly but can pull it out anytime.

I completely agree with your question and suggestion that CSNSTARS must make this term on KYC and AML very clearly. For example, if I intend to join CSNSTARS, I only feel safely if such terms are clearly written and easily found on their website at ToS page. As it is very important for my account and its fund, so if I feel unsafe, I will not register my account or won't fund it after registration.