[ANN] Finestel - Trading Automation for Professional Traders & Asset Managers

[BADERO]

I have been checking out Finestel’s Signal Bot for running the same strategy across multiple exchanges at once
One thing that’s on my mind is latency. Since you can send one signal and have it execute on several accounts/exchanges simultaneously, I’m wondering how much the actual execution speed differs between them
For example, does the order hit Binance noticeably faster than Bybit, or is the difference small once the webhook is received? And how does it behave with other exchanges they support?

[Wakate]

As a programmer myself, I’d love to know more about rate limiting and authentication methods. How are API calls rate limited? Do you use API keys, OAuth, JWT, or something else? And what are the actual limits for pulling trade data or managing multiple accounts programmatically?
Even if it’s not fully available yet, knowing the planned approach would be great

What stands out to me is that Finestel seems focused on infrastructure quality instead of chasing hype features. Multi account execution, automation, and white label support are things professional managers actually need daily.

This is not about standing out but providing the tools that different types of traders needed most to have an effortless trading journey without having to worry too much about the market. The normal way we trade the market few years ago required each trader to be  in the market everytime to check whats happening and the possibility direction the price of Bitcoin could turn to.
Automated trading is taking over which does not often require traders to be in the market for hours to watch how price moves to know when to execute trades.

[MainIbem]

...What stands out to me is that Finestel seems focused on infrastructure quality instead of chasing hype features. Multi account execution, automation, and white label support are things professional managers actually need daily.

This is not about standing out but providing the tools that different types of traders needed most to have an effortless trading journey without having to worry too much about the market. The normal way we trade the market few years ago required each trader to be  in the market everytime to check whats happening and the possibility direction the price of Bitcoin could turn to.
Automated trading is taking over which does not often require traders to be in the market for hours to watch how price moves to know when to execute trades....

You're right but he's gave his opinio based on Finestel beating his expectations of the kind of service they offer you can see where he talked about "infrastructural quality than hype features" which some other platforms are known for. Trading is not as easy as some people thnk but a platform that makes it less stressful for traders thereby giving them opportunity to focus on other activities instead of constantly monitoring the market deserves the accolade.

[CroverNo01]

...What stands out to me is that Finestel seems focused on infrastructure quality instead of chasing hype features. Multi account execution, automation, and white label support are things professional managers actually need daily.

This is not about standing out but providing the tools that different types of traders needed most to have an effortless trading journey without having to worry too much about the market. The normal way we trade the market few years ago required each trader to be  in the market everytime to check whats happening and the possibility direction the price of Bitcoin could turn to.
Automated trading is taking over which does not often require traders to be in the market for hours to watch how price moves to know when to execute trades....

You're right but he's gave his opinio based on Finestel beating his expectations of the kind of service they offer you can see where he talked about "infrastructural quality than hype features" which some other platforms are known for. Trading is not as easy as some people thnk but a platform that makes it less stressful for traders thereby giving them opportunity to focus on other activities instead of constantly monitoring the market deserves the accolade.

Have there been an actual usage of the platform and if yes I would appreciate getting a direct response from the users and mind you, the platform as I read is already what every professional trader with multiple accounts should be aiming towards because we all can agree that trading is actually demanding and with platforms like this, I guess the guest to want to persistently monitor the market would be reduced

[BADERO]

How does the platform handle situations where the exchange is acting up? Does the Signal Bot have configurable circuit breaker logic (e.g. stop after 3 to 5 failed attempts, pause for X minutes, etc.) or is it just fire and forget?
This seems critical when running the same strategy across multiple accounts.

[Mikasa mei]

Has anyone looked into the Hyperliquid integration yet?
One thing I’m trying to figure out is the real latency impact. Since it’s a DEX, how much slower (or closer) does execution feel compared to major CEXs in practice?
Would be useful to know if the latency gap actually affects trading results in a noticeable way.

[Myleschetty]

Has anyone looked into the Hyperliquid integration yet?
One thing I’m trying to figure out is the real latency impact. Since it’s a DEX, how much slower (or closer) does execution feel compared to major CEXs in practice?
Would be useful to know if the latency gap actually affects trading results in a noticeable way.

One of the newer updates that caught my eye was the TradingView Bot supporting duplicate alert protection and stale alert rejection. Those aren't flashy features, but they're the kind of things that matter if you're automating trades.

I've had TradingView send the same alert twice before, so being able to filter duplicates or ignore delayed alerts seems useful. I'm curious if anyone here has already tried it with a live strategy and noticed a difference in day to day use.

[Silverstonez]

Hyperliquid integration is more interesting than anything else because more traders seem to be using it lately,  so it will be interesting to see how multi account tools work with a DEX compared to centralized exchanges.

[crypto mania]

Has anyone looked into the Hyperliquid integration yet?
One thing I’m trying to figure out is the real latency impact. Since it’s a DEX, how much slower (or closer) does execution feel compared to major CEXs in practice?
Would be useful to know if the latency gap actually affects trading results in a noticeable way.

I haven't tried it myself yet, but I'd guess it depends more on the network conditions than the platform itself.

Would be interesting to hear from someone who's used both Hyperliquid and CEX integrations side by side.

[Wakate]

Has anyone looked into the Hyperliquid integration yet?
One thing I’m trying to figure out is the real latency impact. Since it’s a DEX, how much slower (or closer) does execution feel compared to major CEXs in practice?

Since Hyperliquid make use of the on-chain order book and CEX exchanges make use of the AMM model(Automated Money Maker) it is true that the on-chain order book is faster which makes Hyperliquid to have a more faster execution than when you make use of a centralized exchange for trading. What will actually make your trade execution faster also depends on the API connection, Internet speed, the speed of your device and other.  

[BADERO]

Has anyone looked into the Hyperliquid integration yet?
One thing I’m trying to figure out is the real latency impact. Since it’s a DEX, how much slower (or closer) does execution feel compared to major CEXs in practice?

Since Hyperliquid make use of the on-chain order book and CEX exchanges make use of the AMM model(Automated Money Maker) it is true that the on-chain order book is faster which makes Hyperliquid to have a more faster execution than when you make use of a centralized exchange for trading. What will actually make your trade execution faster also depends on the API connection, Internet speed, the speed of your device and other.  

I have no doubt about the infrastructure bottlenecks but your real world execution speed depends heavily on your own setup so If you have hihg ping or slow API routing, it doesn't matter how fast the exchange is that is exactly why I prefer routing my CEX trades through the Finestel terminal their backend servers handle the heavy lifting and API execution much closer to the exchange itself, so my local internet connection doesn't become the weak link that delays the trade

[Wakate]

The Trading view bot is quite easy to use for those that are traders and know how to manage their risk. The risk control is absolutely controllable and easier than the automation perspective. At least I can conveniently set my stoploss and take profit even though something goes wrong with my trading alert, I'll still be safe from unforeseen loses

[crypto mania]

Having multiple exchange accounts in one place is one thing, but keeping track of what actually happened after sending an order is another.

If an order fills on some accounts but not others, can you see the status for each account in real time?

I'd want to check that before trusting any kind of bulk execution.

[Bushdark]

Hyperliquid integration is more interesting than anything else because more traders seem to be using it lately,  so it will be interesting to see how multi account tools work with a DEX compared to centralized exchanges.

The Hyperliquid integration is getting higher adoption than the traditional CEX exchanges because it's more transparent and faster than the AMM order book used by CEX exchanges. You can execute trades from your terminal faster and it's has a high DeFi compatibility for users compared to CEX exchanges that have enclosed transparency.