Epstein knew about Bitcoin back in 2011

[Ishicryptic]

Is Epstein part of Bitcoin’s foundational development.?

The discussion about Epstein has become very interesting lately, not just because of those rumors. There are also links being made to some of the world's major figures. There's never been any evidence that he was Satoshi. Many speculate, but without proof, we can only regard him like everyone else who owns and trades Bitcoin. Still, this news is quite intriguing to follow, though some media may have made it seem exaggerated.

People want to unravel who the real Satoshi Nakamoto, is and any news about it becomes overated because media houses and influencers needs traffic. This is not the first time that somebody is being alleged to be Satoshi and this latest one about Epstein, being Satoshi, won't be the last. Since there is no proof that he is Satoshi or a part of the foundational team I don't see why it has become a big deal to force him into being a part of Bitcoin creation. Maybe we should start to regard every big holders of Bitcoin at the early stage as the real Satoshi. If the real Satoshi ever decides to unveil himself I don't think that any drama will happen, he will simply show us a concrete proofs but I hope he continues to remain anonymous.

[fortelen]

A June 2011 letter found in the “Epstein files” shows Epstein calling Bitcoin a “brilliant idea” while warning about “serious flaws.”
According to CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju, Epstein invested in BTC and crypto projects but never believed Bitcoin would go mainstream. Instead of holding, he preferred trading.
In a 2017 exchange, he simply replied “No” when asked whether Bitcoin was worth buying..
According to Odaily, Epstein was aware of Bitcoin by 2011 and engaged with the early crypto community via emails, discussions with tech figures, and connections to ventures tied to the Bitcoin ecosystem  but there’s no verified evidence that he was involved with Bitcoin’s creation or that he held any foundational role.
Is Epstein part of Bitcoin’s foundational development.?

so what if he knew he was rich and powerful links globally. just cause he knew dosnt mean he was apart of the creation of bitcoin itself and even from the files there is no credible evidence he was apart of owning bitcoin. yea maybe he had money in bitcoin but what wealthy person dosnt. it a great way for rich people to move money around as its hard to trace transactions.

[FortuneFollower]

so what if he knew he was rich and powerful links globally. just cause he knew dosnt mean he was apart of the creation of bitcoin itself and even from the files there is no credible evidence he was apart of owning bitcoin. yea maybe he had money in bitcoin but what wealthy person dosnt. it a great way for rich people to move money around as its hard to trace transactions.

tell them about monero and they will have eyes the size of the buttons on our shirts

but, yeah, these files are just.. a pile that is being milked sooo much lately. and it won't stop probably for some months, if not years.

[Die_empty]

People want to unravel who the real Satoshi Nakamoto, is and any news about it becomes overated because media houses and influencers needs traffic. This is not the first time that somebody is being alleged to be Satoshi and this latest one about Epstein, being Satoshi, won't be the last. Since there is no proof that he is Satoshi or a part of the foundational team I don't see why it has become a big deal to force him into being a part of Bitcoin creation. Maybe we should start to regard every big holders of Bitcoin at the early stage as the real Satoshi. If the real Satoshi ever decides to unveil himself I don't think that any drama will happen, he will simply show us a concrete proofs but I hope he continues to remain anonymous.

Anyone who claims to be Satoshi knows what he would do to proof that his claims are true. Until then, all of these are impostors who are simply seeking attention. In the case of Epstein, people are using it as a negative campaign against Bitcoin. There are even doctored emails on social media which cliams that Epstein invented Bitcoin. They want to use his criminal reputation to attack Bitcoin.

This connection is because he donated thousands of dollars to MIT’s Digital Currency project and invested in Coinbase earlier.

[Furball808]

so what if he knew he was rich and powerful links globally. just cause he knew dosnt mean he was apart of the creation of bitcoin itself and even from the files there is no credible evidence he was apart of owning bitcoin. yea maybe he had money in bitcoin but what wealthy person dosnt. it a great way for rich people to move money around as its hard to trace transactions.

tell them about monero and they will have eyes the size of the buttons on our shirts

but, yeah, these files are just.. a pile that is being milked sooo much lately. and it won't stop probably for some months, if not years.

These files have shocked a lot of people because it shows just how much evil those rich people are. We knew Epstein committed heinous acts but only now we know to what extent. I do not think crypto should be involved because there was really no proof that he created bitcoin or anything related to it but since crypto was used, I am sure some will spin the story and make it seem like crypto made Epstein's evilness happen.

[Saltysugar99]

I have also seen articles on various social media platforms regarding this issue. Although most of the information that is being seen on social media is rumor. However, there are some mentions of Bitcoin there. Maybe it is used for personal communication. However, many are saying that there are secret Bitcoin related documents or the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, which is completely baseless.

[moneystery]

Is Epstein part of Bitcoin’s foundational development.?

Just because he knew about it in the early years doesn't mean he was part of the foundational development of Bitcoin. He was a nobody and nothing more than someone who was interested in the people behind it. So let's just end the discussion about Epstein and Bitcoin because it's completely unrelated, and whatever those people say is nothing more than personal opinion and there's no need to believe that.