I'm seeing some sketchy stuff going on

[Hazink]

It really makes me wonder who hired them to promote Rainbet... or did they all just decide to do it voluntarily? 🤔

Since they are not on the spreadsheet and were never hired by the manager, what I can think of is either they were hired by a shiller to come run this type of promotion, which I doubt that could be it (since there is no special signature used to track their activities) but the practice looks exactly more like it, or all the accounts are controlled by a group who thought that wearing signature will make them appear less suspicious since they all just recently woke up then, but if the later is the case why will they all choose one company signature to wear is another question running around my head.

So for the avatar you see above could mean maybe they were once on the signature campaign before or anticipated to be, but are no longer there.

No, they were never in the campaign, and as far as I can remember, when most of those users were active in almost every part of the forum, and they were making spam headlines, they were never part of the campaign. If you go back to a few months back on the spreadsheet and not recent, you won’t find any single one of them on the sheet. 

[[btc]]

Who's doing this, and for what reason?

It's Rainbet doing this. Specifically, their marketing team. This kind of shit lines up, considering the way the opt to advertise their casino in the medium/space of short-form content (reels, tiktoks, shorts, etc).

Their formula is:

• POV style footage of some "everyday man/joe"
• being a public nuisance in a store/place of commerce
• when they're done fucking with the patrons/employees, they checkout
• before checkout, they say "lemme open up Rainbet real quick"
• *insert public display of gambling*
• pay for their shit with their profits/walk away after a loss

It's engineered to appear that anyone can just whip out their smart-device and pay for their eggs off a quick tap of plinko. It's pure cancer, and I hate knowing this stupid shit has already worked/conviced some idiot into thinking they can rely on gambling as income. The latest gimmick seems to be standing outside Walmart with a television and "making patrons watch brainrot". Oh, and they also exploit the homeless. Fun.

Here are some examples:

• Paying with profits
• Exploiting the homeless
• Making customers watch brainrot

My train of thought is, if they are willing to buy out content creators with meaningless amounts of followers, and get them to do this idiodic behavior in public, are they really above running account farms on this forum sold to Rainbet, with the sole purpose of getting an avatar unlocked so they can put the logo on it?

Let's up the stakes a bit

I see what you did there.

[nutildah]

^^^
he beat me to it but I spent too much time writing this, and my take is slightly different

This is weird. Who's doing this, and for what reason?

As stated by other member, those account actually don't join any signature campaign. So sigban unlikely to make them stop spamming again in the future.

So for the avatar you see above could mean maybe they were once on the signature campaign before or anticipated to be, but are no longer there.

My theory is its a form of link saturation for "passive SEO" purposes. It was probably marketed and sold to Rainbet. I find it highly unlikely anybody would bother buying all these accounts just to do this for free.

Most of the accounts were red tagged before. When they came back they all cranked out similarly awful posts as they were all purchased by the same person. The timestamps of the password changes is pretty undeniable.

So even if my theory is wrong, it wouldn't hurt if they didn't have signatures for a couple of years. Is my thinking. Issuing them an actual ban means the signatures stay up forever, if I'm not mistaken.

[LoyceV]

Who's doing this, and for what reason?

It's Rainbet doing this. Specifically, their marketing team. This kind of shit lines up, considering the way the opt to advertise their casino in the medium/space of short-form content (reels, tiktoks, shorts, etc).

Let's up the stakes a bit: shouldn't "Rainbet" be banned from advertising in signatures, just like what once happened to Yobit:

129 users who were wearing a yobit signature and had at least 1 good report against them in the last 14 days are banned for 14 days. All yobit signatures are wiped. Signatures containing "yobit.net" are banned for 60 days.

Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.

Issuing them an actual ban means the signatures stay up forever, if I'm not mistaken.

"Autobans" wipe the signature, but not the avatar.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

As stated by other member, those account actually don't join any signature campaign. So sigban unlikely to make them stop spamming again in the future.

So for the avatar you see above could mean maybe they were once on the signature campaign before or anticipated to be, but are no longer there.

My theory is its a form of link saturation for "passive SEO" purposes. It was probably marketed and sold to Rainbet. I find it highly unlikely anybody would bother buying all these accounts just to do this for free.

Most of the accounts were red tagged before. When they came back they all cranked out similarly awful posts as they were all purchased by the same person. The timestamps of the password changes is pretty undeniable

Judging by the timestamp of the change of password of those accounts, it's actually undeniable that those accounts might have been bought and all belong to an individual or a group of people whose aim might have been to exploit signature campaigns. But unfortunately, they got caught early and were issued red tag, of which they all ran away from the forum since February 2026. Which clearly justify the allegation more, since nobody was able to challenge or complain about the red tag since it was issued 5months ago in February. So to me, issuing them a temporary signature ban makes no difference because moreover, these accounts have been offline for quite a long period of time now.

And secondly, I will also like to say that sometimes, Rainbet might be innocent and has absolutely nothing to do with these accounts, because for the fact that none of these accounts were found to be associated with Rainbet, all these still remains an allegation until proven beyond all reasonable doubt. Thank you