Ai dont need humans it can run all economy without them faster and better

[Finestream]

But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

It's a fact actually that Ai are already skyrocketing around the globe and most certain that it can outrun faster than humans efforts.
With the manner at which is going it has proven that it has come to stay and to fill in the gaps of humans, but my little initiative is that with all the ongoing tremendous impacts of the AI technology it shouldn't be given dominance over humans rather there should be some limits to their activities in sble to satisfy man's needs.

If ever it happens, the world then will be all about AI, not humans anymore. This is why people should also do their part to make such improvements and excel in different areas of life, as laziness has no room for humans. We don't need AI to dominate us, but AI needs us to fully incorporate the latest technology it brings.

AI may be threatening these days, that is if you look at a negative point of view. But if we can be positive with the latest technology it brings, like it can turn our lives less stressful by using it as our advantage, then we don't have to compete with AI. Let AI follow our orders and demands, cause we are supposed to dominate AI, not the other way around.

[XZERO1]

Maybe in the future, but in its current form? not even close to being independent, if someone says otherwise it means either they haven't used AI for a long enough time or for complicated enough tasks that it shows its dependency on humans and its weaknesses.

Let's say you have a fairly complicated daily desk job and you try to do it fully using AI, if you don't try modifying and editing the end result of every day's work done by the AI you will have a lot of explaining to do to whoever or whatever company you are working for, as there will be a lot of incomplete data, analysis and sometimes even irrelevant data.

Basically AI in its current stage needs a human supervision to be usable when it comes to any serious work, and not even any human would be enough, a person in charge of overseeing the work of AI should know the job perfectly and be able to do at least most of the job alone by him/her self with no AI assisting them, so that they can recognize and remove bad data, but if you can find a person that meets the criteria and equip them with a proper AI to help them to do their job better, then you can almost certainly expect a way better and quicker execution of that particular work.

[demonica]

It's still too early to even consider or worry about AI replacing humans, what more for running an economy without humans? How would AI even start creating data without "humans" who create the prompt? We're still too far—at least for me, to see this happening.

it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Idk about this, but this sounds too fictional to me to be honest. How would it know what's on a person's mind? If ever this could possibly happen, it's definitely not soon enough. I'd probably be dead already before it could happen.

[Jet Cash]

AI is a misnomer - it doesn't have any intelligence. All it does is to correlate a load of facts, and to form an opinion based on the political bias built into it. Many organisations are now having to employ humans to very the results produced by AI.  I try to avoid any AI influence and  evaluate the factual influence myself.  It may be slower, but it gives me a far more useful basis to form my own opinions.

[philipma1957]

Its not secret that ai and bots robots coming...and ai can learn build produce and all of that fast.
The ai can live on earth even without humans, ofc elite can live together with AI and robots without much of people like we have on earth now ai can do faster and heavier work loads then humans.

Ofc , as ai dont have morals or human weakness they will execute the orders of elite very well they can police survailance and many more things.
But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

syfi for sure.


The greatest danger of Ai is rich mother fuckers using it to crush 95% of the population.

This is by far the most likely result of Ai.

You can fight battles faster with it. Attack in wars with it.

I can see someone running 100 drones taking out small town easy peasy with it. March in a protest and get machined gunned out by drones.

What you are talking about is a fear that ai will get smart become intelligent and truly wipe us out. I am not so sure that will ever happen.

[Royal Cap]

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

AI is advancing very fast, it is true and is even surpassing humans in some tasks but I cannot fully accept that humans will become unnecessary, No matter how advanced the technology is, who is creating it, who is controlling it? It is humans. It is said that AI has no morality but in fact, the rules of morality are set by humans. If society, law and human pressure are in place, then there is no reason to be completely afraid of AI, But it is not right to trust it blindly. There is always a risk of surveillance or abuse of power, whether there is AI or not.

[alastantiger]

Its not secret that ai and bots robots coming...and ai can learn build produce and all of that fast.
The ai can live on earth even without humans, ofc elite can live together with AI and robots without much of people like we have on earth now ai can do faster and heavier work loads then humans.

Ofc , as ai dont have morals or human weakness they will execute the orders of elite very well they can police survailance and many more things.
But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it.  

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

I get what you are saying, AI indeed is moving fast and can already do things humans cant, you know from heavy work to complex data analysis and in theory, it could operate with or without us. But humans won’t be completely “not needed", I would argue that because AI lacks morals, context and accountability on its own, it is only as ethical as the systems controlling it. Surveillance, pre-crime predictions are real risks and if society is   not careful, power could be concentrated in ways that harm people.

The speed of AI development means we need stronger regulations and more ethical frameworks now before decisions are automated beyond meaningful human oversight , at the same time we will need to adapt by focusing on creativity, empathy and critical thinking skills machines cant replicate, ultimately the future won’t be about humans versus AI, but about how wisely we integrate it into society without losing control.

[uneng]

The greatest danger of Ai is rich mother fuckers using it to crush 95% of the population.

The wealthy ones need the masses as customers of their products and services. It's not interesting for them to get rid of everyone at all, because that way they will lack resources to compete among themselves for extra influence and power in the world. It's part of the fun to play with the masses, and to annihilate everyone would result in a boring world for the wealthiest individuals on Earth.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

Machines(AI) cannot run the economy. Never.

It is only a speculation but in a thousand years it can never happen. No matter how intelligent they become.

Humans created machines and as such, they have their pros and cons. No machine is self-fix or indestructible. So relax, the economy will still be run by humans and supported by systems(machines) which they have create to make it efficient.

Humans aren’t running the economy well, I don’t think Ai will run the economy without a human giving it roles and responsibilities to follow, a country already have an Ai running a position but it was appointed by a human.
Ai will get more intelligent but it won’t run the economy without a human giving it the power to do so.

[bangjoe]

Those who are not needed are those who become the same and useless while humans who have at least the skills to compete will still be needed, in the modern world everything depends on ability, oh of course not, it has always been like that, no matter how great the AI ​​or humanoids created in the future humans will still be needed, however humans are the main role on this earth. It can't be eliminated, you have to think more realistically, not expectations based only on assumptions from an open mind.

[yhiaali3]

No one can predict the advanced stages of development that AI can reach. It is progressing at a frightening speed, but we have not yet reached the stage where AI controls the Earth as in science fiction movies.

I don't know exactly what the future holds but I'm convinced that whatever happens, humans will remain in control one way or another. God created the Earth for humans not for robots. Robots are meant to serve humans, just like everything else on Earth.

[uchegod-21]

Have we suddenly graduated from saying "AI will take over jobs meant for humans" to saying "humans will no longer be needed?". This is a very big scary assumption which needs to be addressed.

It seems like op has forgotten suddenly that AI still needs humans to control them? Yes, AI don't act on their own; they not have aims and objectives, they have no goals or targets to achieve. They perform the task fed to it by the same humans which are no longer needed. As AI becomes relevant in this present time, humans too are also upgrading to catch up. I believe also that humans through their governments will put in place laws to regulate the use of AI. Except op wants to make us believe that humans are using their talents and skills to create what will eventually destroy them.

[slapper]

You're measuring value in human beings in terms of productive capacity. Speed, efficiency, work output. And if that is your metric, yeah, humans lose to AI. Obviously. But why is that the metric?

Economies do not exist in the natural world. They're human creations intended to organize the distribution of resources. We built them, which means we can build them differently. The fact that we're creating economic systems where human labor will be obsolete. That's a choice, not a law of physics.

And the elite-plus-AI scenario I mean, okay.

What then? They live in automated luxury while all others are. What, exactly? Dies off? Gets warehoused? The scenario doesn't actually make sense since elites need an economy to be elite within. Wealth is relative. Power is relational. You can't be elite in a vacuum.

But more than that, you're assuming that AI capability is what determines social organization. It doesn't. Social organization is political. We could use AI to shorten working hours, without the income being reduced. We could use it to do dangerous jobs while humans do creative work. We could design systems in which AI augments, rather than replaces.

We're not doing that because of the distribution of power, so much as we're doing that because of technical limits.

None of this is inevitable.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Who are behind AI? aren't humans that set the protocols and operate the way they respond, AI couldn't have been without the influence of man, we cant allow for AI when there are many things related to how human efforts and intelligence could be incorporated together with its use, i don't think we can be even safe with the use of AI without human intervention, because we are the brain and the decision making process for all that they do, since we set up their program and prompts.

[Japinat]

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

Machines(AI) cannot run the economy. Never.

It is only a speculation but in a thousand years it can never happen. No matter how intelligent they become.

Humans created machines and as such, they have their pros and cons. No machine is self-fix or indestructible. So relax, the economy will still be run by humans and supported by systems(machines) which they have create to make it efficient.

AI cannot move to its operation without the human that controls it, that operates it, that leads it to its function.

So we don't need to get worried so much that we'll be replaced by AI in the future, that's so impossible. AI is just a machine, and a machine without a human behind it perfecting its moves will still be useless and pointless, AI definitely requires the presence of a human being.

[Ziskinberg]

AI system still requires human input and human intervention for it to move and achieve its target.

However, we have some AI agents that could perform without the task from a human, that could work independently without human's presence and intervention, that's because its workflow has already been designed and there's no need for a physical human being that will navigate it or control its performance.

[Cheema02]

But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

It's a fact actually that Ai are already skyrocketing around the globe and most certain that it can outrun faster than humans efforts.
With the manner at which is going it has proven that it has come to stay and to fill in the gaps of humans, but my little initiative is that with all the ongoing tremendous impacts of the AI technology it shouldn't be given dominance over humans rather there should be some limits to their activities in sble to satisfy man's needs.

Your point highlights the future awareness about the humans importance and many people thinks that in future AI will growing at stage where humans are not required for simple operations. But this point of view is not totally based on reality no doubt AI can perform many tasks and its requires less time than humans but the facts is that AI is actually controlled by humans and its still depends on guide and control given by humans. Along with humans can able to make laws and decide the rules about how to technology is used. On the other hand AI is not the actual problem the actual fear is the misuses of its technology for surveillance. People should focaused on learning new skills instead of fearing from AI because humans have the unique qualities of creativity, emotions and judgment which still beat the technology and almost to copy for machines. So the learning point is that we should be careful and not afraid of technology and use the technology for better life style of humans and not for replace it with humans.

[Pi-network314159]

I just think that AI is just being too much hyped. AI is just a normal artificial intelligence, meaning it's a man made intelligence. This implies that human brain is way higher than that of a computer/ machine. When making am emphasis, we should try as much as possible hit it, it know what we are doing

[DrBeer]

Its not secret that ai and bots robots coming...and ai can learn build produce and all of that fast.
The ai can live on earth even without humans, ofc elite can live together with AI and robots without much of people like we have on earth now ai can do faster and heavier work loads then humans.

Ofc , as ai dont have morals or human weakness they will execute the orders of elite very well they can police survailance and many more things.
But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

So far, this is a fantastic scenario. AI does not yet have intelligence; you probably meant AGI. It is likely that AGI, having gained consciousness, will be able to build a new civilization, although it will still need humans in the initial stages. In short, the scenario is possible, but significantly later and under slightly different basic conditions.

[Somto9Light]

Okay why don’t you just submit your forum account details to an Ai to handle your activities on the forum so you can continue sleeping… in as much as AI has become very smart they are still human dependent and can’t even reason logically as human they can’t relate with your emotions it’s input and output no logical processing like the human brain. AI lacks true consciousness and subjective opinions or experience and also originality is what AI is struggling with.

The truth is that AI can not work without instructions, for example. Before AI can perform any task they have to wait until you issue a command or instructions and even most of the AI requires human assistance as they can't function by themselves. I have never seen AI doing something accurately just as we human beings does I mean starting from the beginning till the end without the help of human being talk more of running the economy, I think Op is just going too far with this AI of a stuff.