Ai dont need humans it can run all economy without them faster and better

[Zigabel]

Thinking that humans may not be needed at a time is more Luke a faulty mentality because to start with, AI didn't create them selves and so human interference can and will always be a factor to consider around AI, one such that you cannot take away just like that from them. AI will need human assistance and so does the robots, they are machines and will breakdown at a time a d even their up grades to better and smooth functionality are mostly Influenced by humans, they are not just generated independently, there is always a link to some human Intervention which cannot and will not be completely taken out of the picture at any time.

[Maslate]

Well, I guess the ultimate goal of this AI is to function without human intervention, so if it can perform tasks independently and still achieved high quality tasks, then they might be hitting almost their ultimate goal.

However, the performance of a human being with high mental and emotional intelligence creates a big difference when it comes to the outcomes of the task. AI can be efficient and effective, but human performance still defines with utmost satisfaction.

[Cryptohygenic]

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

Technology can only take over the world when its relevance is aided to process extraordinary tasks that maybe be too exorbitant for human processor easier.
AI or Bots do not produce and reproduce each other and so on, the technologists inventing them can not afford to produce a tool that will be against them in the future. Scenarios like that are abolished to safe humans.
Power is also interesting to outperform when you have other people below your office or as employees of which having AI doing all that jobs for you alone wont let you feel the true values of life where it is necessary to align with others for common goals.

[SquallLeonhart]

You're measuring value in human beings in terms of productive capacity. Speed, efficiency, work output. And if that is your metric, yeah, humans lose to AI. Obviously. But why is that the metric?

Economies do not exist in the natural world. They're human creations intended to organize the distribution of resources. We built them, which means we can build them differently. The fact that we're creating economic systems where human labor will be obsolete. That's a choice, not a law of physics.

And the elite-plus-AI scenario I mean, okay.

What then? They live in automated luxury while all others are. What, exactly? Dies off? Gets warehoused? The scenario doesn't actually make sense since elites need an economy to be elite within. Wealth is relative. Power is relational. You can't be elite in a vacuum.

But more than that, you're assuming that AI capability is what determines social organization. It doesn't. Social organization is political. We could use AI to shorten working hours, without the income being reduced. We could use it to do dangerous jobs while humans do creative work. We could design systems in which AI augments, rather than replaces.

We're not doing that because of the distribution of power, so much as we're doing that because of technical limits.

None of this is inevitable.

To be fair that is what the UBI stands for, universal basic income. What the idea suggests is that when the rich are so rich that they do not even need us anymore, we could just stay at our homes. This means rich will be fighting off against other rich, and they will all be paying high amount of taxes because they will be the ones with all the money, and we will just be getting some standard pay, and with that money, rich will compete against each other to get it.

So if you get lets say 1200 dollars a month UBI now, amazon and tesla will fight over who will get your 1200 and that's how they will try to get richer. While this makes no sense in the current world we live in, believe me, with the ways are moving, maybe one day it could make sense.

[btc78]

Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

i don’t know if technology can successfully read someone’s mind like what you are saying

ai will be rampant but ai will serve humans and humans build and control ai so even if ai will be all over the world i don’t think it will replace humans after all it only replaces human errors not humans themselves

[Zlantann]

Its not secret that ai and bots robots coming...and ai can learn build produce and all of that fast.
The ai can live on earth even without humans, ofc elite can live together with AI and robots without much of people like we have on earth now ai can do faster and heavier work loads then humans.

I find your thoughts extreme. Can AI run or live on Earth without humans? Thats not going to happen, these machines will always need humans. There will always be system errors or failures that will need human intervention.

Ofc , as ai dont have morals or human weakness they will execute the orders of elite very well they can police survailance and many more things.
But if AI will get more power then nobody seems to understood of anything and going against AI will be like playing against computer.
Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

 AI has contributed greatly to crime detection, which is commendable. As for the elite using it against the others, let's wait and see. I don't give much attention to what is coming in the future. I want to avoid being in bondage to the fear of the unknown.

[Oasisman]

Ai dont need humans it can run all economy without them faster and better

AI can do work faster with more efficiency than humans, but to run an economy alone, that's an exaggerated statement.
Yep, AI can run a perfect system, but it will never ever run a whole society. You don't want AI to just impose taxes and policies on its own, that will simply never work. It will always need human guidance. The word economy is always tied with humans, so that alone can determine that what you've said is close to impossible.
In fact, in all aspects, AI won't rule the world alone. It will always need a human. We all know that AI is improving and getting smarter faster than we ever thought, but let's stop with the hype that AI will eliminate humans eventually.

[Versatile_choice]

Also, the precrime analyse....it sounds like utopian world but in future ai can detect criminal activity of person even before he or she will do it. 

Many humans still dont understood that upcoming world they will be not needed.

i don’t know if technology can successfully read someone’s mind like what you are saying

ai will be rampant but ai will serve humans and humans build and control ai so even if ai will be all over the world i don’t think it will replace humans after all it only replaces human errors not humans themselves

How is that even possible for AI to detect criminal activity of a person even before he or she will do it, don't you think that you're over- hyping this AI? You seems to have forgotten that this AI is been made by man they don't just come out from no where since hunan beings can not detect criminal activity of a person even before he or she will do it then how did you think AI can be able to do it when they are being created by human?

Just as btc78 Said that even though AI is rampant they can't control human so Long as they are created by human it is that same human that will control them.