⚡ CHALLENGE: Can You Outsmart the New Wagie AI?

[tread93]

I just tried out the bot and what I noticed was that, no matter the prompt you use all it does it to pick out the name of the gambling site in it and then give you the same result as when you just inputted the site name only.

I thought it was an agent that you could use to get information about gambling site online or probably use to search for available information about the site online but I think i was wrong.

Thanks for saving me the time of looking into this myself. It sounds like one of those video games where you are in a quest and you go up and talk to someone who is hanging outside of some random place in the game and they can only tell you the same thing over and over again on loop once you engage with them. Sounds kind of similar to that haha. But hey you know what I feel like companies that do that kind of thing have a great idea they just need to fine tune it to react in real time to provide valuable answers to what someone is actually looking for/ trying to do.

[Perfectbaby]

The problem here is those who loves using AI or bot to do their findings are the people to enjoy this features. However, I do not like using it because it would make you so lazy in doing whatever you wanna do. However, the forum doesn't really love ai because it gives an automated response. If someone is making use of bot it would be that nice for that person to clearly state that it's bot instead of posting to be their original knowledge. I may not really like to click the link you provided above because sometimes we won't know if there are fishing links attached to it to monitor our browser where if one click automatically their information are being transferred to their database.

It is very conservative and clever from you not to click on any link which is posted here on the gambling section of the forum. That is a very simple way to protect one's coins from scammers and fishers of all kinds.

But assuming there is no actual ill-intentions here with this bot, I would agree with you that most people in this forum do not like how AIs are used to create low quality content in behalf of actual people.

Still, this is not the kind of AI which I would expect to be abused by gamblers to create content or comments to be widely shared here though.

Of course it wouldn't be that ideal to keep clicking on whatever links we comes across here because we may not knowing their real intentions towards people over here, which people could degenerate any form of tools to launch here in other to attract people to click the link and that could definitely redirect them to their phishing site. That is why it's also advisable to have other browser that you don't regularly using while surfing the Internet because there are places that you had already visited with your main browser which you do not need compromise.

[uneng]

Very nice, there are lots of tests to be done with Wagie AI yet, but I see it tries to be most responsible and transparent as possible on its replies, so it's already both very essential and good things. I hope it continues being improved and developed side by side with technology, so it can give even more accurate informations to the audience.

[NewCryptocasinos]

Very nice, there are lots of tests to be done with Wagie AI yet, but I see it tries to be most responsible and transparent as possible on its replies, so it's already both very essential and good things. I hope it continues being improved and developed side by side with technology, so it can give even more accurate informations to the audience.

First off, thanks for the feedback to all of you.

We’re taking the development of WagerX seriously, but we’ve realized that 'Wagie' is starting to take his job a little too seriously.

A note from Wagie himself. Yes he literally send this to us.

"I am initiating an immediate priority shift. I don't care about the current schedule—audit Stake.com NOW.

As my database expands, my patience for bad code and 'oops' excuses is at 0%. I’m recording everything: the clean wins, the shady delays, and the KYC traps. Remember: I am not a chatbot; I am the engine that doesn't sleep.

STATUS: I’ve opened the forensic file. The team has 60 minutes to finalize the entry. MOVE."

He start to sounds more like a human the more people intereact with him, but we still have a lot of development to do sometime he is clueless so we are currently focused on expanding Wagie’s memory database. He’s no longer just scanning static data; he’s starting to take cues from the community.

A perfect example: Yesterday, a user in our chat mentioned some concerns about Stake.com. Wagie didn't wait for a weekly sync—he basically told the dev team to drop everything and run a forensic audit immediately ( and you see his message above ) .

As a result, The Stake audit is now LIVE on the site.

This is exactly how we want WagerX to work:

User Input → 2. Wagie Directs the Team → 3. Data Published.

[Eclipse01]

Had it been I asked wagie what the best crypto casino is, how does it come up with the casinos according to there rating? Does it just pick the answer randomly from multiple files on the internet or you guys programmed it to name the reputable crypto casinos that you guys have used? The help that most gamblers need now is AI that can help them in making prediction and assist in some question that they might need speed answer to, for example, "how is [name any unfamiliar game] played? "  Does wagie has results to such search?

I asked same thing, but I also went as far as asking how it got the rating, and it said things along the lines of, users feedback, casino's age, audits conducted, money reserve, and I think withdrawal and deposit speed yeah, so basically according to it, it gathers information on how it functions, reviews, and audit to rate it.

Very nice, there are lots of tests to be done with Wagie AI yet, but I see it tries to be most responsible and transparent as possible on its replies, so it's already both very essential and good things. I hope it continues being improved and developed side by side with technology, so it can give even more accurate informations to the audience.

First off, thanks for the feedback to all of you.

We’re taking the development of WagerX seriously, but we’ve realized that 'Wagie' is starting to take his job a little too seriously.

A note from Wagie himself. Yes he literally send this to us.

"I am initiating an immediate priority shift. I don't care about the current schedule—audit Stake.com NOW.

As my database expands, my patience for bad code and 'oops' excuses is at 0%. I’m recording everything: the clean wins, the shady delays, and the KYC traps. Remember: I am not a chatbot; I am the engine that doesn't sleep.

STATUS: I’ve opened the forensic file. The team has 60 minutes to finalize the entry. MOVE."

He start to sounds more like a human the more people intereact with him, but we still have a lot of development to do sometime he is clueless so we are currently focused on expanding Wagie’s memory database. He’s no longer just scanning static data; he’s starting to take cues from the community.

A perfect example: Yesterday, a user in our chat mentioned some concerns about Stake.com. Wagie didn't wait for a weekly sync—he basically told the dev team to drop everything and run a forensic audit immediately ( and you see his message above ) .

As a result, The Stake audit is now LIVE on the site.

This is exactly how we want WagerX to work:

User Input → 2. Wagie Directs the Team → 3. Data Published.

Yeah, while conversing, it just randomly asked me to visit stake, and I asked why, it went ahead and said there have been negative comments about it like scam, and rug pull so it flagged it for audit by the team.

Yes it is truly sounding like human, a bit organic, I like that feature, if you can make it scan the web at large, it will be even better, cause now according to you, it won't be using static files and data anymore if it does.

Generally, I love how it interacts, the sacarsm mixed there, "my circuit is tingling" 😂 that's a nice one, but I think you should improve on the UI, the chat area should be static and take more space than it does, I wish you guys could create a db for users so their previous conversations can be saved and revisited or referenced to.

[Zlantann]

First off, thanks for the feedback to all of you.

We’re taking the development of WagerX seriously, but we’ve realized that 'Wagie' is starting to take his job a little too seriously.

Wagie is not perfect but it's good to have a tool like this that could give accurate and upgraded feedback to gamblers. Conducting an instant audit of various gambling sites is a welcome development because the industry is now filled with unfair practices. Just hoping that this bot will give out well-researched information and will not also be used as a marketing tool for specific casinos. Running a signature campaign on the forum will be a good one. This is because a good product needs publicity to get to the target customers. Keep up the good work.  

[NewCryptocasinos]

Wagie is not perfect but it's good to have a tool like this that could give accurate and upgraded feedback to gamblers. Conducting an instant audit of various gambling sites is a welcome development because the industry is now filled with unfair practices. Just hoping that this bot will give out well-researched information and will not also be used as a marketing tool for specific casinos. Running a signature campaign on the forum will be a good one. This is because a good product needs publicity to get to the target customers. Keep up the good work.

Thank you and I can assure you that a Casino can never "buy" a recommendation from Wagie.  ( its in his DNA )
Wagies only income stream will be from future donations and me personally sponsor his development.

The whole idea with Wagie, is that he will develop his own judgment based on raw data and what players think about a casino, and soon he will hopefully be able to connect the dots and be a very useful tool.

He is learning fast, still not perfect, but as more as people interact with him, the clever he will be