It's funny how people who also ask these question dont bother to ask why some painting as so expensive. Somewhere in the world, a person has the Salvator Mundi painting hanging on his wall or even hidden somewhere in his house, yet he purchased it for about $450 million. Meaning the same painting is everywhere on the internet. The only become dumb when it comes to Bitcoin.
Everyone should know the Salvator Mundi oil painted which is credited to the famous artist, Leonardo da Vinci. As expensive as it costs it actually add little to no benefit to the economic lives of men as does bitcoin, or perhaps someone could school me of the economic benefits, if am missing on anything.
Art is not a good counterexample, because it is used for tax evasion and money laundering. Some art work is of exceptional quality, most is trash. Still, the numbers that are reached in these transactions are unjustifiable. I can ensure you for a fact that most people who have very expensive art don't even look at it once on an average day, which means that even in the eye of the buyer the real value of the artwork is very low.
I tell you mate, the authorities and every other personalities who sought to discredit bitcoin's value actually knows what they're doing, they ain't damn dumb.
Wrong, don't assign malice to things that can be explained by incompetence. You make a very naive assumption that people in their fields know what they are talking about, when most often the opposite is the case. One gets positions and titles based on paper work and connections, not actual expertise. You can be officially titled an expert in many fields and you can be as dumb as a rock.
A lot of people need to understand that bitcoin is a financial weapon that they need to hold with all that noise to be ignored towards the life transforming profit that lies ahead.
Tool? Sure. Weapon?
This ridiculous comparison and shallow take only could come from people who don't really understand bitcoin and the notion that bitcoin is a gamble. Well, everything is a gamble. If you bought ubisoft stock you'd be -58% in just one year.
This stupid and generic argument has no place here, it has no relation to the comparison of Bitcoin to teeth. Bitcoin is not a gamble of any kind unless you are purely viewing it from the perspective of potential fiat returns, but if you are you are just an average sucker anyway.
I don't even think this take even deserve the spotlight IMO. sounds like a banter than a scientific explanation about bitcoin yet they make the video as if the opinion is credible.
With this you are correct, people are often opening threads here about all kinds of statements by all kinds of people. Giving them attention, even in a dismissive way, just gives them more relevance.
