I found an AI

[babo]

The user was not banned from the forum, he was banned from signatures for 1 year

Is it actually 100% confirmed that all he got is a signature ban and not some sort of a temprorary ban as well?

I am asking because he made appeal using alt account, and not his main one. Which is kinda strange if he still has access to it.

just look at his account and you realize that in the signature it says that he is banned until next year for the use of signatures
no more no less
that's how I found out, going to see his profile and seeing this
I think it's a better punishment than banning the account..

[Rikafip]

just look at his account and you realize that in the signature it says that he is banned until next year for the use of signatures
no more no less

Yeah I saw that note in his signature space, but that doesn't mean that all he got is a sig ban.

I think it's a better punishment than banning the account..

I agree. In the past, members were getting permanently banned over a single copied sentence, while it could have been handled much better this way. Better late than never I guess. 

[Ivystar5]

Today is making it exactly 2 months since I was ban from the forum not entirely but posting or responding to PMs however, the ban was meant to last for only 1 month with is 30 days but ended up to stay for 31 days which I was active all the time checking in, but however I couldn't make a post during the ban with the ban Appeal account because it would have been considered ban evasion if I had responded to this thread, so I kept my cool.

However I was engaged with other life activities since I felt the forum passed a very wrong judgement on my case but I couldn't argue further because I firstly make a comment which I said " whatever is Theymos and the mods choice on this case I will accept it" but however I guess I was wrong I shouldn't have said that because I was not lying nor am I an AI or use AI to make post in the forum.

Where I am so surprised is the fact that someone (nutidah) even did the maths and did understand that I wasn't using AI nor did the post which has been deleted was made from AI using the forum standards of finding out AI posters yet the mod took his decision which was not in my favour.
Furthermore, After the allegations I discovered the OP of this thread didn't really care much about this case as he left the thread in the hands of the forum.

The experiment was one that has never existed before so it was nice to see but it was flawed to and extent however OP didn't even wait to see if anyone was going to get caught or not but because he was eager to post this after my comment was quite questionable which one or two people did question him.

Now, I think that the fact that the signature ban still exist is no longer a matter of if I was AI or not but now an oppression because I can't do anything about it, having looked at the comments and how people agreed to the fact that I wasn't using AI or have I used it especially with PowerGloves comment, I now have concluded that it's no longer an unjustified punishment but an oppression, which is why I stayed away from the forum till today and now it's 2 months so I'm back to question the authorities... WHY?

Why waiting on the answer, I will use this opportunity to thank everyone especially @nutidah for his strong arguement that the accusations was a false accusation, and also use this opportunity to ask LoyceV to remove the neutral tag which he gave since I am not an AI shitposter unless there is evidence which was used to back up such claim as this thread being used as reference obviously said otherwise, and for Babo I don't really know why you copied LoyceV and did same thing without even taken your time to make further investigation, unless there are valid evidence or reason I don’t see why you also have to tag my account.

[nutildah]

Well you certainly don't write like an AI lol.

And you're absolutely right: it was unfair for you to be banned for AI use, if that's what you were indeed banned for.

The trap set, which is the subject of this thread, is the definition of witch hunting, and if anything, we've learned what not to do in the future.

[babo]

Why waiting on the answer, I will use this opportunity to thank everyone especially @nutidah for his strong arguement that the accusations was a false accusation, and also use this opportunity to ask LoyceV to remove the neutral tag which he gave since I am not an AI shitposter unless there is evidence which was used to back up such claim as this thread being used as reference obviously said otherwise, and for Babo I don't really know why you copied LoyceV and did same thing without even taken your time to make further investigation, unless there are valid evidence or reason I don’t see why you also have to tag my account.

I just put a neutral informational tag, you're making a fuss about nothing.
I've been following the AI ​​issue in other contexts—it's called prompt poisoning—and I assure you I know a lot about it, but it hadn't occurred to me to apply it in the forum.
There are no apologies, and we just added a note, me and LoyceV.
There is no witch hunt, just a note.

[Ivystar5]

Why waiting on the answer, I will use this opportunity to thank everyone especially @nutidah for his strong arguement that the accusations was a false accusation, and also use this opportunity to ask LoyceV to remove the neutral tag which he gave since I am not an AI shitposter unless there is evidence which was used to back up such claim as this thread being used as reference obviously said otherwise, and for Babo I don't really know why you copied LoyceV and did same thing without even taken your time to make further investigation, unless there are valid evidence or reason I don’t see why you also have to tag my account.

I just put a neutral informational tag, you're making a fuss about nothing.
I've been following the AI issue in other contexts—it's called prompt poisoning—and I assure you I know a lot about it, but it hadn't occurred to me to apply it in the forum.
There are no apologies, and we just added a note, me and LoyceV.
There is no witch hunt, just a note.

If it's nothing then it shouldn't exist either if I'm correct, looking at the reference it points to this thread which is a failed and false accusation, having learnt that the AI accusation is wrong why should a neutral tag still exist ?

it's just a note, like you said but the note connotes something that could be read with meaning which is not true if anyone is looking at the trust of IVYSTAR?
I still insist it should be removed because I never used an AI.

[babo]

If it's nothing then it shouldn't exist either if I'm correct, looking at the reference it points to this thread which is a failed and false accusation, having learnt that the AI accusation is wrong why should a neutral tag still exist ?

it's just a note, like you said but the note connotes something that could be read with meaning which is not true if anyone is looking at the trust of IVYSTAR?
I still insist it should be removed because I never used an AI.

Notes are meant to be read, otherwise it would be a red tag
Anyone who wants to come here and read the discussion, the link is placed on purpose... it's not a random tag so anyone who wants to do business with you can form their own opinion.
if it was a red tag I could even agree with you..