Thank you for the guidance, Faizan Zen. I will take this to the Scam Accusations board as you suggested.
I want Zaka1221 to meet me there and show us his "brilliance" in C++ programming. Since he claims to have found "malware," let him come and point out the specific lines of code in public.
I am eager to see him prove his technical claims instead of hiding behind automated bot reports. Let's see if he actually understands the code he is reporting.
ATTENTION TO ALL:I will
NOT be moving this thread anywhere. This is the place where the accusation was made indirectly, and this is where it will be settled. I don't want to confuse the community with multiple threads.
Zaka1221 claims to be a professional "Scam Hunter" who wanders the forum searching for targets to gain Merits. Fine. If he is as professional as he claims, let him come
HERE and justify his report.
Let him explain why he trusts a flawed "Sandbox" report over the manual audit of
SatoshiLabs (Trezor). I am staying right here, and I challenge him to face the developer of the code he is attacking.
Zaka1221, the stage is yours. Come and show us the "malware" you found, or admit you are just a Merit Hunter who failed to understand the code.
Exposing the "Professional" Accuser Zaka1221:Looking at Zaka1221's history (Reports #1918, #1919, #1924), it is clear we are dealing with a "Script-Kiddie" who doesn't understand C++.
Zaka1221 admits that 60+ industry-standard Antiviruses found
ZERO malware. Yet, he claims to know better because a Sandbox bot gave a behavioral flag.
Technical Lesson for Zaka1221: Any blockchain core (Bitcoin, Litecoin, Aureus) will trigger a Sandbox flag because it uses P2P sockets and data encryption. If you don't know the difference between "Network Syncing" and "Malware," you have no business reporting developers.
You are not protecting the forum; you are
Merit Farming by attacking legitimate Layer 1 projects that have been audited by
SatoshiLabs.
I repeat my challenge:
Show us one line of malicious C++ code or admit you are a fraud.
Clarification on Aureus (AUR) Wallet Behavior and False Malware Reports
To the Bitcointalk Community and Administration,
I want to clarify the recent reports against Aureus (AUR) and explain why the malware accusations were mistaken.
1️⃣ Aureus is a Strong Layer 1 Project
Aureus (AUR) is a fully independent Layer 1 blockchain using SHA-256 Proof-of-Work, the same secure algorithm as Bitcoin.
The network has a real hashrate of 123 TH/s, providing strong security and decentralization.
All operations, including peer-to-peer connections and wallet encryption (wallet.dat), are standard for any Layer 1 blockchain and are not malicious.
2️⃣ Why the Previous Report Was Misleading
The report by Zaka1221 relied mostly on Sandbox behavior flags, which often produce false positives for blockchain cores due to P2P networking and encrypted wallets.
No malware was detected: 0/60 Antivirus engines flagged the code.
The report ignored external audits and reviews, such as SatoshiLabs (Trezor), which fully reviewed and approved the code.
3️⃣ Purpose of the Report Was Misunderstood
The report focused more on the appearance of suspicious behavior rather than technical analysis.
This is common with new Layer 1 projects, where automated behavior analysis may mistakenly classify normal blockchain operations as malware.
These false positives should not overshadow the verified legitimacy and security of Aureus (AUR).
4️⃣ Conclusion
Aureus (AUR) is a safe, audited, and operational blockchain, not malware.
Any Sandbox flags are false positives, reflecting the wallet’s advanced security features, not malicious intent.
I encourage the community and moderators to review the technical evidence and consider restoring accounts and removing any incorrect “Scam” labels.
Official Resources for Verification:
GitHub:
https://github.com/sipherapex/aureus-coreBlock Explorer:
https://aurascan.gt.tcLive Exchange:
https://fyn-ex.com
