[Q] Is this ok?

[eternalgloom]

Moderators should merge all the posts. There are some people that have the same posting pattern which is not good.

Moderator only merge if they find consecutive posts in a row.

Question being, shouldn't this 3 posts be merged into one (or more like, they shouldn't be separate in the first place)?

Yeah, he could definitely do that. Ninjastic says he average make 35-40 posts per week. That's not too much for any sig campaigner.

So why you need to make one-liner consecutive posts, when you being paid handsome amount for that?? I only know one reason why a person would spam, it's multi accounting,,

The Stake campaign notoriously has the highest maximum post quota of any campaign. You often see people wearing that signature with poor etiquette, behaving like social media reply guys, spamming as many replies as possible.

Did you check Rainbet or Rollbit1 & 2? they are Champion in this case, Stake is far behind I think  

[libert19]

I’m not spamming the forum neither am I manipulating the rules. This is a witch-hunt imo. I have been on this forum for about 4 years, never have I seen such a case before on meta. Asking for an account to be banned because you believe their posts should have been merged is extreme imo. I believe this should be a learning experience for myself and other forum members about posting etiquette.

Such posting pattern is definitely spam in my eyes, and to seek clarity on the same I created this thread, I have nothing against you, you can be assured of that.

I personally don't find it a big deal, this user is just airing their grievances with gambling platforms.

I see far worse posts on that board on a daily basis.

It's not about post quality, and just because something 'worse' exists, doesn't make thing at hand 'right',  this is wrong mindset imho.

You could reply to all those posts in a single post, but you replied to them in different posts, so that you have more posts.

That’s your take and I think I get your point now.

"that's your take"!? — that's literally the correct way to respond.

[SatoPrincess]

I’m not spamming the forum neither am I manipulating the rules. This is a witch-hunt imo. I have been on this forum for about 4 years, never have I seen such a case before on meta. Asking for an account to be banned because you believe their posts should have been merged is extreme imo. I believe this should be a learning experience for myself and other forum members about posting etiquette.

Such posting pattern is definitely spam in my eyes, and to seek clarity on the same I created this thread, I have nothing against you, you can be assured of that.

Trust me, I don’t think so. I also don’t have anything against you or hosemary. You have been here since 2017, and I’m sure you have seen all sorts. I’m sure you created the thread to hear what the community has to say. Like said earlier, I have learnt something new as well.

[libert19]

...

Such posting pattern is definitely spam in my eyes...

Trust me, I don’t think so.

What makes you think posting pattern in question is alright?

[Sandra_hakeem]

**What is it with waking up one morning to find yourself among an accusation on Meta, on something you never thought was abnormal to do**

What you did was not normal.
Whenever I want to reply in a thread, I read the posts until the last one and reply to all I want in a single post. I make a new post only if the the post I want to quote has been made after my previous post. Everyone should do the same.

I read at least the last page of every Mega thread before posting. Honestly, HM, never thought of it that way; I thought if an existing post looked too lengthy, after quoting some, I could post it, then quote any other person, as long as I wasn't posting in a row.

[libert19]

**What is it with waking up one morning to find yourself among an accusation on Meta, on something you never thought was abnormal to do**

What you did was not normal.
Whenever I want to reply in a thread, I read the posts until the last one and reply to all I want in a single post. I make a new post only if the the post I want to quote has been made after my previous post. Everyone should do the same.

Honestly, HM, never thought of it that way; I thought if an existing post looked too lengthy, after quoting some, I could post it, then quote any other person, as long as I wasn't posting in a row.

I call this bullshit, and don't defend yourself with bs. You don't respond to a comment that was already there prior to comment you made, separately.

[GeorgeJohn]

Theirs nothing much wrong with the 3 posts, her attention was caught first by someone reaction to the thread, and in same page3, she reacted to the another comments...before reacting or responding to op of a thread..

What i found wrong is that, she's suppose to commented the third comments to the thread first, before quoting other users...But if we should be disciplining people base on that, many users will be a victim..

I do come across such kind of response in the forum..And secondly, some comments caught people attention and you will not remember to follow protocol why responding to a comment....

[Mee Sa]

Theirs nothing much wrong with the 3 posts, her attention was caught first by someone reaction to the thread, and in same page3, she reacted to the another comments...before reacting or responding to op of a thread..

It's completely wrong! All they have to do is admit and delete the posts. It's not that hard