[Q] Is this ok?

[Karl_3000]

I will not blame those members because there's no set rules for such type of posting, it's not ethically right approach and I believe everyone should fix such mistakes and do not repeat such type of posting again.

You know I try to imagine such type of posting by more users, and forum starts looking like a spam fest — this is deffo not right, and if there should be a 'rule' to restrict users from such type of posting, then it should be made.

I have posted a topic about it but there is no positivity that something good will come out of the thread.

This is the thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574687.msg66414675#msg66414675

Maybe if an established member like LoyceV, Lovesmayfamiles or Nutildah can create a thread about it, it will be better because the admin may listen to them. At least 7 days ban or 30 days signature ban will be good for such people.

[libert19]

I will not blame those members because there's no set rules for such type of posting, it's not ethically right approach and I believe everyone should fix such mistakes and do not repeat such type of posting again.

You know I try to imagine such type of posting by more users, and forum starts looking like a spam fest — this is deffo not right, and if there should be a 'rule' to restrict users from such type of posting, then it should be made.

I have posted a topic about it but there is no positivity that something good will come out of the thread.

This is the thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574687.msg66414675#msg66414675

Maybe if an established member like LoyceV, Lovesmayfamiles or Nutildah can create a thread about it, it will be better because the admin may listen to them. At least 7 days ban or 30 days signature ban will be good for such people.

I was aware of the thread, but it kinda went over my head, so being unsure I didn't mention it.

[SamReomo]

You know I try to imagine such type of posting by more users, and forum starts looking like a spam fest — this is deffo not right, and if there should be a 'rule' to restrict users from such type of posting, then it should be made.

There might be other members doing such thing, some might do it intentionally some might by mistake. The ones who're doing such a thing regularly are the ones increasing spam on the forum. The ones who regularly post on gambling boards know better that there are many spam posts at those boards but still there's no such rules against that type of spam, and I believe it's not possible to set such rules.

I would say that the best a user could do is to report such posts if he/she finds such posts, the report will let moderators do their job, it's on them to either merge such posts or delete the posts. That will increase the work load of moderators but at least that'll help to reduce such type of spam on the forum. Another option is to ignore the members who do such type of posting but that's someone's personal decision.

[libert19]

You know I try to imagine such type of posting by more users, and forum starts looking like a spam fest — this is deffo not right, and if there should be a 'rule' to restrict users from such type of posting, then it should be made.

... but still there's no such rules against that type of spam, and I believe it's not possible to set such rules.

Why not? Create a rule about such types of posts (I don't think rule 32 is exactly for such type of posting, is it?), and when such posts are reported, mods give user temp ban and with each repeated offense the duration of ban increases.

That will increase the work load of moderators but at least that'll help to reduce such type of spam on the forum.

I don't think it'll increase workload significantly. Getting punishment in form of temp bans, either user will learn to not repeat it or they'll keep getting elaborated bans, profit?


By the way, what should rule look like!?

— Posts that are there prior to post you are making must be responded in single post!?

[SamReomo]

I don't think it'll increase workload significantly. Getting punishment in form of temp bans, either user will learn to not repeat it or they'll keep getting elaborated bans, profit?

If members learn after getting temp bans then that's good but still for present moderators of gambling boards the workload will increase.

By the way, what should rule look like!?

— Posts that are there prior to post you are making must be responded in single post!?

I don't know how that rule might sound like but here's an idea:

Posting multiple posts by quoting a post to increase your post count is not allowed.

[libert19]

I don't think it'll increase workload significantly. Getting punishment in form of temp bans, either user will learn to not repeat it or they'll keep getting elaborated bans, profit?

If members learn after getting temp bans then that's good but still for present moderators of gambling boards the workload will increase.

Workload increase shouldn't be much afterall how often do you come across posting like this? Plus, as I said, if they don't learn, they'll keep getting bans with progressive duration, don't think many would be inclined for that, would they?

By the way, what should rule look like!?

— Posts that are there prior to post you are making must be responded in a single post!?

I don't know how that rule might sound like but here's an idea:

Posting multiple posts by quoting a post to increase your post count is not allowed.

Ok, tell me if I am understanding it correctly or not, cause this seems to only apply to this type of posting?

[libert19]

So, nothing will come out of this? Cause, I see a similar instance here (mentioned below), and I was reminded of the topic.

...

...

This cracked me up a bit but I also think it's weird to show a hand sign when gambling because it doesn't actually make any sense ,perhaps for those losing this helps them relax, just saying because people have different ways of processing losses. Not all is related to mental issues, it's like people that gamble and count their fingers, they are doing this so that anxiety that they have would be reduced.

2 days later, makes this comment, quoting a comment that was already there by time above response was made,

...

...

Asides from the fact that you play poker maybe it's because you aren't just used to doing that, i would say that this is like an habit for most people, they have gotten so used to it and it feels like something they do involuntarily. Making visible signs when gambling is caused by a lot of things and the most common one is frustration. From the experiences I had with crash games in the past it's something I can relate to.

I'd have reported if my reports of SatoPrincess's posts would have yielded something but the posts of hers are as they are. So, what's the point? Should I just assume already that forum is ok with such type of posting, so I keep my annoyance to myself hereon.

[FinneysTrueVision]

So, nothing will come out of this? Cause, I see a similar instance here (mentioned below), and I was reminded of the topic.  

I am almost certain that Mate2237 is his alt account. Both of them stopped posting on Altcoinstalks at the same time and they both are marked with a red dot, indicating they have multiple accounts, which further reinforces my suspicion.

These two accounts have made 115 posts combined in the past 7 days on this forum.
https://bitlist.co/search?author=Agbe,Mate2237&date_min=2026-02-19&date_max=2026-02-25&limit=20

People sometimes doubt that account farms can be run by a single person, but from what I’ve seen, we can’t underestimate the amount of effort, however low-quality the results may be, someone is willing to put in just to get paid.

[Agbe]

So, nothing will come out of this? Cause, I see a similar instance here (mentioned below), and I was reminded of the topic.  

I am almost certain that Mate2237 is his alt account. Both of them stopped posting on Altcoinstalks at the same time and they both are marked with a red dot, indicating they have multiple accounts, which further reinforces my suspicion.

These two accounts have made 115 posts combined in the past 7 days on this forum.
https://bitlist.co/search?author=Agbe,Mate2237&date_min=2026-02-19&date_max=2026-02-25&limit=20

People sometimes doubt that account farms can be run by a single person, but from what I’ve seen, we can’t underestimate the amount of effort, however low-quality the results may be, someone is willing to put in just to get paid.

This account has no connection to mate2237, we are not the same person and also this account isn't linked to any other one. you talked about the two accounts making 115 posts combined and I don't understand why someone else's activities has any connection to mine. I post according to my campaign rules.
And why I am red dotted over there is only known by admin. And I stopped posting there because I am restricted in many things. Yet I visit once a while. And I don't know why another person thread, became mine.. You left the main discussion of the thread and focus on another person. Is it a kind of hatred or what?

[FinneysTrueVision]

This account has no connection to mate2237, we are not the same person and also this account isn't linked to any other one. you talked about the two accounts making 115 posts combined and I don't understand why someone else's activities has any connection to mine. I post according to my campaign rules.
And why I am red dotted over there is only known by admin. And I stopped posting there because I am restricted in many things. Yet I visit once a while. And I don't know why another person thread, became mine.. You left the main discussion of the thread and focus on another person. Is it a kind of hatred or what?

You were doing the same thing as the subject of the thread, so I am not going off topic. I am not accusing you of breaking campaign rules, just of making an excess number of posts.

As for Mate2237 being your alt, a very poor mixing service was used when participating in this review campaign on Altcoinstalks. I was easily able to find the deposit and withdrawal transactions from the mixer.

How do you explain the deposit being made from your address when the review was submitted by Mate2237?
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/802b17ee66adebe56e31fca39042f16aaf59cd1f3df94e9425cbdc42dc900de2

[stompix]

And why I am red dotted over there is only known by admin.

Because the admin there doesn't give a damn about the secrecy of IPs when it comes to cheating, unlike here.

So, any explanations for the issue with the addresses in FinneysTrueVision post?
Since both you and Mate2237 applied for the same signature campaigns this changes a lot of things from just useless spam to actual red tags!