Singleplayer casino games vs multiplayer gambling games

[ralle14]

There's already a bunch of multiplayer casino games offered by third-party providers, and some casinos even release their multiplayer version of the game.

If you're referring to PvP games then it's probably not that better because it's very difficult to set up when gamblers don't always play for a long time. A few casinos that i've been playing at needed bots to host games continuously because waiting for someone else to match your bet could take forever.

[rodskee]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

there are already card games like this. but i know from some games there’s a ranking system and it might be anonymous but it still fuels some of the competitive fire inside of us wanting to rise into the ranks.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Playing solo in a relaxing mode is much fun and thilling specially when you are winning or hit a big win and a jackpot.
If I want a multiplayer i will just go play the poker at the table. I also play Tong-its online. A 3 player game.
BTW if you are looking for multiplayer and play poker, we have some good tournament in this forum.

[rdluffy]

Even in video games, I prefer single-player games, so I continue playing and betting solo 

I prefer slots, but for those who enjoy games with other human players, there are plenty of card options that involve luck and skill, specially poker

You mentioned Plinko
What would Plinko's multiplayer mode be like, for example?

[fikrett]

There's already a bunch of multiplayer casino games offered by third-party providers, and some casinos even release their multiplayer version of the game.

If you're referring to PvP games then it's probably not that better because it's very difficult to set up when gamblers don't always play for a long time. A few casinos that i've been playing at needed bots to host games continuously because waiting for someone else to match your bet could take forever.

that's not nice, imo. i don't like this mechanic where the bots fill up the places in usual games, because, clearly, you go for multi to get the thrill of playing with the peeps.. not with someone that is robot.

i wonder which games are implemented in such a way in casinos.. besides the card ones

[Hazink]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

A casino is not like an online video game, which we try to play with the next person from the other screen. If I want a multiplayer game, then I have other options, not a casino even if I have to place a bet on it, and the suggestion for games like Plinko. I really don't know how fun it would would be to make it multiplayer and how the casino will have to earn from it for hosting such game.

[joeperry]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

It actually depends on the player's preference, there are times that I do like playing alone quietly and there are times that I wanted to play with other people like poker and there's also times where I want to play community game like crash game where in you, along with other players will place bet on the same round. I'm not sure what do you mean thrill in playing casino alone, for me it's just the same as playing with other people, the thrill is in the game itself. If you prefer multiplayer, then that's good, that's why gambling sites have a vast option you can choose from, it's up to you which one you'd likely enjoy.

[maydna]

I feels playing casino games alone is good especially if we only spends little time. But playing with others is no problem as long as you can keeps discipline and knowing when to stops. I don't playing plink, flip or wheel but just traditional cards that I know with my friends.

You can try by yourself what is the thrill so you know the different. So that will depends on them choosing playing gambling alone or against others and what gambling games they will play.

[bakasabo]

I can name one big advantage why single player game is better than multiplayer (or as OP suggests as player-vs-player game) - when you play single or play against casino, you always have a game or round to play, you always have an opponent. When playing against other opponent, you might have to first wait before you find someone who will agree to play against you, or wait until minimum amount of players to fill for game to start.

[0xredhot]

Casinos have options. There are games you can play alone, games you can play against other players, and games you play against the house. You can hop from one game to another depending on your preference or mood.

In plinko, flip, or wheel, would it really matter if you're playing against other players or the house? What makes the difference? Either way, it isn't a skill-based game, you're just relying entirely on luck to win. The results are random and you playing against other players doesn't involve any kind of strategy or any competitive edge.

I think you explained it the best i meant pvp only from fairness point, whereas whole pot is between you and other players and house takes small cut but things are completely random "luck based" so there is really still no need for pvp since it is not skill based.

[batang_bitcoin]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

That would be fun but casino games are good to be played alone. And that's why we have that preference to play them when we just want to be alone and no one is around. I've seen those kinds of attempt with trying to put a multiplayer for some games but, they didn't just liked by the community. So, it's best if these games remained to be played alone by all of us but it would be a good plus if there's an option like that but I don't think it will get that much attention from gamblers.

[danherbias07]

There's always the poker when we want multiplayer games. Then, there's also the blackjack, but all of you are against the banker, so it's not really against each other.

It's tough to find a gambling site that offers other types of multiplayer games, especially if it is an offshore type of casino. Internet connection should be considered, and there's a chance of losing the entry fee just because one gambler is disconnected, which could lead to more issues like scam accusations.
Multiplayer in Plinko? I don't know how that will work. I cannot even imagine playing against another while playing a very simple game.

[0xredhot]

So for example Plinko multiplayer was whoever collects more bigger multipliers takes it all, one ball costs same so the more balls you buy the more chances you have to hit higher multiplier than opponent, and ofc opponent can hit bigger multipliers in cummulative way than you with fewer balls based on luck.

so whoever collected more multipliers 10x, 20x, 1x, 100x takes the whole prize pot, game session could be 30-60s (this might not make any sense obviously but thats how I view the plinko pvp game)

[Johnlomape]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

If you are looking for this kind of fun when gambling, since it is like you prefer to bet on casino games, I will advise you to gamble on live games where you are not the only one playing the game but you and random players at the same time. This would increase your fun and bring better result for you.

You can also try sportbook in case you have not tried that before, it is always fun when you and your friends are expecting the same outcome after you must have bet on a team to win a match or to produce multiple goals in that same match. The fun can distributed based on your interest and the result you expected to get.

[mcdouglasx]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

I don't know if a game of chance is compatible with multiplayer; it would be very strange. It would technically be like betting against the computer since neither player would require any skill. I recommend you think about skill-based games; those all fall into the multiplayer category. You just need the time and desire to learn and improve your skills over time.

[panjul07]

So for example Plinko multiplayer was whoever collects more bigger multipliers takes it all, one ball costs same so the more balls you buy the more chances you have to hit higher multiplier than opponent, and ofc opponent can hit bigger multipliers in cummulative way than you with fewer balls based on luck.

so whoever collected more multipliers 10x, 20x, 1x, 100x takes the whole prize pot, game session could be 30-60s (this might not make any sense obviously but thats how I view the plinko pvp game)

Plinko lovers will not be interested to play with such scheme, simply because they get less amount when they hit big multiplier as they win the money on the pot only unless the players also win what they get on the plinko as normal play.
Beside it is less interesting (from my point of view as plinko lover), I believe it will also complicated to implement the game.
IMO, all games can be modified into multiplayers game but not all games will be more interesting to be played against each others.

[0xredhot]

So for example Plinko multiplayer was whoever collects more bigger multipliers takes it all, one ball costs same so the more balls you buy the more chances you have to hit higher multiplier than opponent, and ofc opponent can hit bigger multipliers in cummulative way than you with fewer balls based on luck.

so whoever collected more multipliers 10x, 20x, 1x, 100x takes the whole prize pot, game session could be 30-60s (this might not make any sense obviously but thats how I view the plinko pvp game)

Plinko lovers will not be interested to play with such scheme, simply because they get less amount when they hit big multiplier as they win the money on the pot only unless the players also win what they get on the plinko as normal play.
Beside it is less interesting (from my point of view as plinko lover), I believe it will also complicated to implement the game.
IMO, all games can be modified into multiplayers game but not all games will be more interesting to be played against each others.

That is fair point.

[Findingnemo]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

Everyone have different preferences, if you like to play against a real player the games like Poker might be a good option or you can also try PvP games which are not as popular as casino but it is new gen casino games. But I won't say playing against the system which is completely random is boring because no one knows what is going to happen which seems to be the highest level of adrenaline right?

[Dunamisx]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

Knowing this that playing different games comes with their various conditions attached, we may have to choose between which one we wanted to play and how the condition is involved in playing such, there are single player games and at the same time they are multiple player games in the casino, all we can do is to choose which one suits our taste and we go for it and play to the best of our satisfaction.

[Dave1]

I wonder what is the thrill of playing casino games alone, would it be better if we had multiplayer and play against each other and gambling on games such as plinko, flip or wheel?

I think we all play online because we wanted to be privy ourselves. So even if we're in the table with muliplayer, it doesn't really matter to me, or it could defeat the purpose of playing online. If we talk about traditional base casinos, then it's totally different as there are games that you really have to interact with other players. So if you are a person who doesn't want to socialized then online games is for you.

And again, if that is your personality, you might choose a game that you can play alone, like going 1:1 on black jack or play your favorite slot game machine. But there are also online games that have multiplayer like poker or roulette. Although there are machine base 1:1 roulette games too so that it could fit your need to be alone.