Something about Satoshi Nakamoto

[Jubilee58]

History reveals that Satoshi Nakamoto is an anonymous creator of bitcoin, but the owners of this companies are not anonymous but known, so I don't believe Satoshi Nakamoto derived his name from the name of this companies mentioned here.
This idea is speculative like you said, and not based on fact and real evidence.

[Wiwo]

Really, this is the most sarcastic thread I have read in a long time, any ways is everyone right to speculate on the Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, at least you went a bit further from what we used to have to associating gadgets companies to Satoshi ths time, at least but the funny thing is, if Satoshi is in any way associated with this company why none of them is accepting bitcoin?

This should be discarded and also ops please add a link to the original content of this image for further clarification on the why this image was created among multiple others.

[Cleanshit]

Really, this is the most sarcastic thread I have read in a long time, any ways is everyone right to speculate on the Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, at least you went a bit further from what we used to have to associating gadgets companies to Satoshi ths time, at least but the funny thing is, if Satoshi is in any way associated with this company why none of them is accepting bitcoin?

This should be discarded and also ops please add a link to the original content of this image for further clarification on the why this image was created among multiple others.

Now i understand he really went to far this shit he pulled out about the owners of bitcoin, well on a second thought was this pulled out necessary? At first i was thinking about this because it was more of a confusion to me well from what the op listed out about this company the annoying part how was he able go this far by thinking such.

[Doan9269]

Lets assume that this brands were just selected to form the coinage for the name Satoshi Nakamoto and has nothing to do with the bitcoin creator, though my assumption anyway, which is interesting to see some old brands appearing in this manners, but i want to be rest assured this has nothing to do with bitcoin or its founder name.

[Majestic-milf]

 Sometimes, for lack of better explanation, many people go come up with different ideas trying to explain why something be as e be and I no go lie, nah beta reason to believe say this Satoshi Nakamto moniker dey coined from this four big companies but at the same time, Samsung no dey accept Bitcoin payment directly, except through other means  same as Toshiba and i just feel say the person wey coin this names out nah just another curious user trying to make sense of things. Like I go always talk, e go dey best to drop the notion of finding out who Satoshi be and just enjoy the innovation because the more people dey bother their self about finding out, e go come look as if nah that one be the problem instead of finding out ways to make adoption more widespread.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

Take the first three letters of Samsung and the last two of Toshiba it will spell Samba which is related to brazil, it is like a popular dance.
This no be any idea at all it’s just a coincidence that has no meaning to what and who Satoshi nakamoto is.

[Wiwo]

Take the first three letters of Samsung and the last two of Toshiba it will spell Samba which is related to brazil, it is like a popular dance.
This no be any idea at all it’s just a coincidence that has no meaning to what and who Satoshi nakamoto is.

Funny you man, but then you are right there is no way to connect this coinage with Satoshi Nakamoto, alot of narratives are being created around Satoshi personality.

Any ways we can't be surprised to see this kind of narrative and force connections between prominent brands to famous individuals like Satoshi etc.

[Josefjix]

Lets assume that this brands were just selected to form the coinage for the name Satoshi Nakamoto and has nothing to do with the bitcoin creator, though my assumption anyway, which is interesting to see some old brands appearing in this manners, but i want to be rest assured this has nothing to do with bitcoin or its founder name.

Yeah, somehow if it was, those brands would've been accepting Bitcoin as means of payment by now and somehow promoting it in a way or another but they didn't. If they were, as least we should've heard some Bitcoin reserves happening through the management as well as by the board of directors. This is just a coincidence and nothing that has to do with Satoshi.