Will Trump attack Iran by March 1

[Oluwa-btc]

The US cannot risk attacking Iran. Historical experience and current strategic developments make this a very low probability.

We know what happened in Vietnam. We know what happened in Afghanistan. For the US, Iran would be an even worse experience than either of those.

Iran's population, national identity consciousness, and doctrines make classic occupation scenarios extremely costly.

Furthermore, after its failures in Vietnam and Afghanistan, the US shifted its preference to proxy wars. They know they are not sufficient for countries of this scale in a direct war.

The US is a bubble, but it continues to control perception management due to the Hollywood effect.

Donald Trump can not you mean?! Because,  the US citizens do not want to be involved in a war with Iran with more likelihood to see increased immigrants in their country. We will see what happens in the next few days.

Syria likewise Iraq,  we saw over 8000 Americans lost to another war for the sake of Israel. These wars in the middle east are not Americans interest but that of Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu's. Trump being advised to back off from such disastrous attempts but he's chosen to be stubborn regardless regardless.

[trendcoin]

Oluwa-btc,

Trump is a smart man. He knows what will happen to him if he enters Iran. That's why I see the possibility of the US entering Iran as zero.

First of all, the US hasn't been on the field for a long time, preferring proxy wars, and I should also mention that they are failing even in those.

By the way, I am not a supporter of the Iranian regime; I am simply sharing my objective views based on historical data.

In the end, I think the US will drop a few bombs on Iran from a long distance, some markets will be shaken up, and a few days later, everything will be forgotten, and someone will win and someone will lose in the markets.

[Vod]

That's why I see the possibility of the US entering Iran as zero.

First of all, the US hasn't been on the field for a long time, preferring proxy wars, and I should also mention that they are failing even in those.

By the way, I am not a supporter of the Iranian regime; I am simply sharing my objective views based on historical data.

In the end, I think the US will drop a few bombs on Iran from a long distance, some markets will be shaken up, and a few days later, everything will be forgotten, and someone will win and someone will lose in the markets.

Zero?  More like 20% when you posted that - now it's more like 90%.  Talks have failed and despite Trump claiming to have obliterated their nuclear program, they are only weeks away from having weapons grade plutonium.  Might have to make it an annual event even.  :/

[Dunamisx]

Let's not even talk about the poor economy going on in Iran currently than led to the intervention of the United States, I see no much reason why he ran should not also have their own nuclear weapon when other countries do, the standards they are lacking behind for them to be able to have a love and infrastructure and other development to enable them have the ability of establishing a nuclear weapon should be listed and granted as well, except if there is much to do this we are not knowing.

[Vod]

Let's not even talk about the poor economy going on in Iran currently than led to the intervention of the United States,

The people are rioting due to lack of water, correct?   If the government prioritizes destroying Israel, they will destroy themselves as well.  The destruction the US can cause with 1/3 their fleet will certainly include any water delivery infrastructure.   History will refer to this as the start of the "Water Wars".