There's a common theory (potentially a conspiracy theory) that administrations (particularly the current one in the US) try to dump a lot of information ahead of major votes or world events to skew what's being reported on and overwhelm reporters.
In a lot of instances, due to population size and the amount of people that hyperfocus on random things, I'm not sure how well this actually plays out and works to the administration's advantage. Aside from that, it's often touted that the people who think they're most resistant to propaganda can often be the most susceptible to some of it too so maybe that's potentially happening here. 1. Large info dump 2. A few questionable activities that gets the medus talking 3. Something insane that's presented as mundane or normal to reporters (eg by anchoring) that no one really takes account of...
How is that a "conspiracy theory", when Steve Bannon has publicly admired Trump using using "Flood The Zone" strategy?
But if you are talking about Epstein Files, current administration isn't "dumping" them for their benefit. They even strongly opposed it but they are legally obligated to give them, even though they have given only fractions of it. And even deleted some of them in panic afterwards.7
You can just follow the real world, there doesn't need to be some theories why they do what they do, when it's out in the open.