BitcoinQ.cc. Bitcoin community driven quantum computer.

[bitcoinqtum]

BitcoinQ.cc. Bitcoin community driven quantum computer.
2026 is quantum year. Bitcoin community is developing quantum computer. https://www.bitcoinq.cc/ by the bitcoiner, of the bitcoiner, for the bitcoiner.
Email: press@bitcoinq.cc

[ABCbits]

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

[aioc]

... by the bitcoiner, of the bitcoiner, for the bitcoiner.

Stop using these words when the bottom line is you're just going to ask people to send you money, it's one of the worst crowdfunding page I've seen, no whitepaper, no roadmap, no information about the team and by the way, your social media links are not working, better make it good so people will believe that the project is real.

[MarryWithBTC]

I visited the website and found too many mismatches but i am not revealing all so that they will not re-strategize but I'll make some expository to save potential victims.

Project Goal The primary goal is to upgrade approximately 4 million old Bitcoin addresses using P2PK (direct public key) to quantum-resistant addresses.

There is a fundamental issue here because bitcoin addresses cannot be upgraded by a third party.
It is only the private key holder can move coins from a P2PK output to a new quantum-resistant address. No mechanism to migrate funds as op claimed unless the private key is known.

BitcoinQ is a community-driven quantum computing project with a 5-10 year timeline, aiming to raise 100-500 Bitcoins per year through crowdfunding to develop a quantum computer.

it is obvious to the blind that at the current valuation, 100-500 BTC is very unrealistic for a community based crowdfunding. That is obviously an institutional based crowdfunding. May you please contact Saylor of strategy and co for this purpose.

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

You are not wrong, but why would holders carelessly surrender their coins when there's no legal or technical explanations to this.

[bitcoinqtum]

Quantum Risk coming.
The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11457
at the same time, Google claims ‘quantum advantage’ again — but researchers are sceptical . https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03300-4
We need to move now.

[bitcoinqtum]

I visited the website and found too many mismatches but i am not revealing all so that they will not re-strategize but I'll make some expository to save potential victims.

Project Goal The primary goal is to upgrade approximately 4 million old Bitcoin addresses using P2PK (direct public key) to quantum-resistant addresses.

There is a fundamental issue here because bitcoin addresses cannot be upgraded by a third party.
It is only the private key holder can move coins from a P2PK output to a new quantum-resistant address. No mechanism to migrate funds as op claimed unless the private key is known.

BitcoinQ is a community-driven quantum computing project with a 5-10 year timeline, aiming to raise 100-500 Bitcoins per year through crowdfunding to develop a quantum computer.

it is obvious to the blind that at the current valuation, 100-500 BTC is very unrealistic for a community based crowdfunding. That is obviously an institutional based crowdfunding. May you please contact Saylor of strategy and co for this purpose.

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

You are not wrong, but why would holders carelessly surrender their coins when there's no legal or technical explanations to this.

Spend some time to study the public key leaked bitcoin. And how quantum can break private key by the leaked public key.

[robelneo]

Spend some time to study the public key leaked bitcoin. And how quantum can break private key by the leaked public key.

So you think you or your team can materialize this project? Make us believers by showing us more about who is behind it and what your capabilities are.
So, how do you launch your crowdfunding campaign with the website you have now, which isn't convincing to the community?

[bitcoinqtum]

... by the bitcoiner, of the bitcoiner, for the bitcoiner.

Stop using these words when the bottom line is you're just going to ask people to send you money, it's one of the worst crowdfunding page I've seen, no whitepaper, no roadmap, no information about the team and by the way, your social media links are not working, better make it good so people will believe that the project is real.

Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Social media links are not active yet. Shortage of admin. And no need it yet.

[MarryWithBTC]

I visited the website and found too many mismatches but i am not revealing all so that they will not re-strategize but I'll make some expository to save potential victims.

Project Goal The primary goal is to upgrade approximately 4 million old Bitcoin addresses using P2PK (direct public key) to quantum-resistant addresses.

There is a fundamental issue here because bitcoin addresses cannot be upgraded by a third party.
It is only the private key holder can move coins from a P2PK output to a new quantum-resistant address. No mechanism to migrate funds as op claimed unless the private key is known.

BitcoinQ is a community-driven quantum computing project with a 5-10 year timeline, aiming to raise 100-500 Bitcoins per year through crowdfunding to develop a quantum computer.

it is obvious to the blind that at the current valuation, 100-500 BTC is very unrealistic for a community based crowdfunding. That is obviously an institutional based crowdfunding. May you please contact Saylor of strategy and co for this purpose.

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

You are not wrong, but why would holders carelessly surrender their coins when there's no legal or technical explanations to this.

Spend some time to study the public key leaked bitcoin. And how quantum can break private key by the leaked public key.

Wait, are you saying that you will use quantum to recover vulnerable coins and charge a fee? If this is correct, it shouldn't be called upgrading.

You are using what sounds like a technical real concept, i.e quantum risk to exposed public keys to justify a funding model that lacks a technical road map.

I quoted the above conversation because you avoided the objections i raised above, such as how 100 - 500 BTC will be collected among others.

[bitcoinqtum]

I visited the website and found too many mismatches but i am not revealing all so that they will not re-strategize but I'll make some expository to save potential victims.

Project Goal The primary goal is to upgrade approximately 4 million old Bitcoin addresses using P2PK (direct public key) to quantum-resistant addresses.

There is a fundamental issue here because bitcoin addresses cannot be upgraded by a third party.
It is only the private key holder can move coins from a P2PK output to a new quantum-resistant address. No mechanism to migrate funds as op claimed unless the private key is known.

BitcoinQ is a community-driven quantum computing project with a 5-10 year timeline, aiming to raise 100-500 Bitcoins per year through crowdfunding to develop a quantum computer.

it is obvious to the blind that at the current valuation, 100-500 BTC is very unrealistic for a community based crowdfunding. That is obviously an institutional based crowdfunding. May you please contact Saylor of strategy and co for this purpose.

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

You are not wrong, but why would holders carelessly surrender their coins when there's no legal or technical explanations to this.

Spend some time to study the public key leaked bitcoin. And how quantum can break private key by the leaked public key.

Wait, are you saying that you will use quantum to recover vulnerable coins and charge a fee? If this is correct, it shouldn't be called upgrading.

You are using what sounds like a technical real concept, i.e quantum risk to exposed public keys to justify a funding model that lacks a technical road map.

I quoted the above conversation because you avoided the objections i raised above, such as how 100 - 500 BTC will be collected among others.

You can  call it in different name as you like.
The quantum risk is there. Deep state is developing quantum computers. They won't share it with bitcoin community.
Talk is cheap.

[fortunecrypto]

You can  call it in different name as you like.
The quantum risk is there. Deep state is developing quantum computers. They won't share it with bitcoin community.
Talk is cheap.

With all your long quotes and so many unanswered questions from the members, we feel you are alluding to questions about your intentions and capabilities, which we do not expect from a developer who should have a clear roadmap and vision for their project.
We need a direct and correct answer.

[satscraper]

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you actual goal is to steal 4 million BTC and share 50% of it with whoever fund you in first place.

I think their goal is even simpler than what you suspected.

They’re looking for gullible people who might believe in the project, put money into it, and then they disappear with the gathered funds.

A rhetorical question: could anyone working in fields relevant to quantum computers seriously trust the project that has nothing behind it but sheer “tare”?

Pure scam in my view.