You are actually doing marketing for this scammer with this compilation, are you actually serious?
The OP wrote a list of all active managers, regardless of reputation. At the same time, a trust score is listed next to each manager, so someone who chooses a manager has insight into something like that.
Otherwise, the trust rating is just for that, not like you are doing and leaving red nonsense.
Including scammers is fine, because of random reasons? Yes?
AB de Royse777 is also a scammer but that case is more disputable because many DT members are protecting their sources of income
Have you even researched the entire case you keep linking to when you call out Royse? I mean, have you read everything from start to finish?
Yes I have, he's a serial exit scammer from the 3rd world and you are naive idiots.
Also, you should order the managers according to their trust rating. The way that you have them now is completely disorganized and makes no sense. Hhampuz would be #1 in this case, and he definitely is #1 on the forum anyway. Furthermore, since 2 out of 3 columns are clickable links you might as well make the first one a link directly to their profile too.
We all on the forum know who Hhampuz is, but do you defend him here and promote him to be in the #1 position because "protecting your sources of income"? You're in his campaign, aren't you?
So you are saying that Hhampuz is not #1 here?

The irony is that you are trying to call me out on bias for stating the objective truth, meanwhile you fail to bring up that the current sorting is the most subjective and biased possible. Either it should be alphabetical or ordered based on the trust rating, everything else is extremely biased and suspect.
He gave me negative tag because I add "God of Thunder and AB de Royse777" in the managers list for hiring, I don't know if what I did was bad. I only create this thread for visibility for projects owners for easy access instead of their portfolio Threads to be scattered around the service board.
That's exactly what you did. If you promote scammers, you are an accomplice. There is nothing to dispute about this. If I were to promote some scam casino, I would be littered with red tags. If someone promotes a scam signature campaign manager, they get defended because that manager may hire some DT members in the future. Classic double standards.
I still haven't publicly said who I think is the #1 manager here. Maybe you can open a discussion about it, maybe it will be clearer for you.
If you are unwilling to admit it, it is clear that you are biased. Focus your time on improving the reputation of signature campaign managers, another exit scam is in the making. Everybody is innocent, look at their disclaimers!
