Small multipliers doesn't guarantee win

[oktana]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

[icebar]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

Small odds do not guarantee winning, rather cause the most regret if your loss with small odds, you have to put comparatively more money to get a good return. There is a good chance of winning, but if you lose, the loss is also high. When placing bets, the gambler must bet within his ability and be ready to accept any situation. There are many new gamblers who are interested in betting on small stakes for winning, but they forget that gambling can lose at any time. They bet without thinking about this, and later they are the ones who suffer the most. In every bet, the gambler must remember that winning or losing is completely uncertain.

[skarais]

~~~

Small odds do not guarantee winning, rather cause the most regret if your loss with small odds, you have to put comparatively more money to get a good return. There is a good chance of winning, but if you lose, the loss is also high. When placing bets, the gambler must bet within his ability and be ready to accept any situation. There are many new gamblers who are interested in betting on small stakes for winning, but they forget that gambling can lose at any time. They bet without thinking about this, and later they are the ones who suffer the most. In every bet, the gambler must remember that winning or losing is completely uncertain.

Isn't it too much of a hassle for yourself when you gamble but don't want to take a little risk or even want to eliminate all the risks? Gambling is not for those who are not ready to take risks, even if they lose money on low odds then they should accept it without any problem. Low risk for low reward, while high risk for high reward, so choose one according to your ability to manage risk.

[batang_bitcoin]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big).

There really is no sure odd. Even with 1.01. They can't be sure with that although the slight chance of losing is there and there's the possibility that it can happen.

Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

This explains it, the risk remains but it doesn't go away. So with the smaller risks, it also comes with smaller rewards that gamblers need to take if they chose to go with smaller odds.

[Fortify]

If there is something that has made me not to give in to much to gamble it would be my experiences. As a gamble beginner I started by trying out alot of options and odd choices but I was never a lucky beginner and I'm glad I didn't get to experience that newbies luck that somehow manages to trap most persons because it would have been easy for me to fall for it.
However I have tried betting on huge multipliers and small multipliers and still end up getting disappointed by small multipliers and this brought me to the conclusion that gamble is indeed just for entertainment and not a money making opportunity because tell me why a 1.15 odds will still end up not going as planned.

I've had a bunch of bets fail around 1.03x in quick succession, on the day I learned that even the safest looking bets are far from it yet the bookmaker wins in almost every scenario with the margins they make. It wouldn't be called gambling if it was guaranteed, so let's throw that idea out the window. Small multipliers means tiny profits, which to me are not even worth doing. Let's imagine that you place the same bet amount each time and choose to take on 10 bets at 1.10 each - that amount is required to double your starting money. But even if you are successful it could wipe you out of just a couple fail in your next run of ten.

[Stable090]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

There is nothing like sure odd, when you see anyone offering sure odds, then you should know the person is just deceiving you. When you are gambling when the odd isn’t much, then that doesn’t mean you going to win, your intention might be to just double your money, you might be so sure about the bet which you are about to place, and at the end you still going to lose, so don’t joke with your risk management, and don’t believe anyone that tells you there is anything like sure bet.

[MRY]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

There is nothing like sure odd, when you see anyone offering sure odds, then you should know the person is just deceiving you. When you are gambling when the odd isn’t much, then that doesn’t mean you going to win, your intention might be to just double your money, you might be so sure about the bet which you are about to place, and at the end you still going to lose, so don’t joke with your risk management, and don’t believe anyone that tells you there is anything like sure bet.

Yes, basing our reliance on the idea of betting will just take us into the trap of the fraudulent act which may be very harmful to our budget. Although we may be quite certain about our choices, in any game of chance uncertainty always exists. Without considering capital protection, the adverse effect will be extremely hard to undo in the future. The ability to create critical thinking in our processing all assists us in being alert at any given moment.

[Yorubek]

If there is something that has made me not to give in to much to gamble it would be my experiences. As a gamble beginner I started by trying out alot of options and odd choices but I was never a lucky beginner and I'm glad I didn't get to experience that newbies luck that somehow manages to trap most persons because it would have been easy for me to fall for it.
However I have tried betting on huge multipliers and small multipliers and still end up getting disappointed by small multipliers and this brought me to the conclusion that gamble is indeed just for entertainment and not a money making opportunity because tell me why a 1.15 odds will still end up not going as planned.

I think there is nothing certain about gambling that can save you from gambling losses, no matter how experienced a gambler you are, winning or losing depends on luck, a lucky gambler can win most of the time by gambling, gambling through research is a very wise thing to do, your own research helps to control the gambling impulse. It is true that gambling is mainly for entertainment, it cannot be an easy way to make money or get rich quick, we can gamble only for entertainment purposes, thus controlling our emotions and reducing excess financial risk, thus protecting ourselves from gambling addiction.

[suzanne5223]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

Yes, no multiplier has the characteristic to be called sure odds. But, if you're talking about sports betting there's room for the small multiplier to give the gamblers the high chance of winning the game despite the house be favored in every game. It is just that winning the game is not promised.

[SUPERSAIAN]

Odds like 1.15 or 1.20 never interest me, but with excessively high odds, I try to stay within a certain average. I've lost bets a few times with odds like 1.15 or 1.20, and that's why I don't want to do that anymore; I'd rather try my luck with better odds. If low-odds matches guaranteed a win, then everyone would have a much higher chance of winning, but that's not how things work, everyone knows that.

[danadc]

What is big there is the multi, doesn't matter if what is the bet amount placed but a 100 dollar win out of less than 1 dollar bet is literally huge already for some poor people like me and obviously, we can't afford to bet high like 5 dollar per spin but it do sure gives us a pretty huge sum if we get some decent multi.

You're right , I've seen that in some slot games it's like that $5 for 5 spins is very fast for me , but for some players, spending $20 on 20 spins is something they don't mind even if they lose, I see it from my point of view Sports betting is a separate issue some players bet $100 on sports betting and lose it all And what's better? Making 100 $1 spins on a slot or making the total bet?

[uneng]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

Bookies make sure to compensate the increased chance of that event happening with low potential profit, so on long run, for each loss you face, you have to win another ten rounds to achieve a tie between losses and winnings. It's definitely not worth, because it's actually hard to face just one loss every ten bets placed. Small multiplier is a sure way to lose money quicker than if the gambler was pursuing superior odds.

[lionheart78]

What is big there is the multi, doesn't matter if what is the bet amount placed but a 100 dollar win out of less than 1 dollar bet is literally huge already for some poor people like me and obviously, we can't afford to bet high like 5 dollar per spin but it do sure gives us a pretty huge sum if we get some decent multi.

You're right , I've seen that in some slot games it's like that $5 for 5 spins is very fast for me , but for some players, spending $20 on 20 spins is something they don't mind even if they lose, I see it from my point of view Sports betting is a separate issue some players bet $100 on sports betting and lose it all And what's better? Making 100 $1 spins on a slot or making the total bet?

If we look at the slots and sports betting, we will see the difference in mechanics.  A slot is dependent on the random generation of numbers which makes the result very uncertain, while sports betting depends on the skills of each team, where a better can see and analyze which makes a skilled bettor have a higher chance of winning.  So it makes sense if one bet $100 per match on sports betting and someone bets a dollar to make 100 spins for a chance to win in a slot.

Even though both games have variables that can change the result of the game, the slot is totally relying on the randomness, unlike sports betting, that often times the team skills often overcome these variables, thus making the prediction of a skilled sports analyst have a greater chance of winning.

[Zadicar]

What is big there is the multi, doesn't matter if what is the bet amount placed but a 100 dollar win out of less than 1 dollar bet is literally huge already for some poor people like me and obviously, we can't afford to bet high like 5 dollar per spin but it do sure gives us a pretty huge sum if we get some decent multi.

You're right , I've seen that in some slot games it's like that $5 for 5 spins is very fast for me , but for some players, spending $20 on 20 spins is something they don't mind even if they lose, I see it from my point of view Sports betting is a separate issue some players bet $100 on sports betting and lose it all And what's better? Making 100 $1 spins on a slot or making the total bet?

If we look at the slots and sports betting, we will see the difference in mechanics.  A slot is dependent on the random generation of numbers which makes the result very uncertain, while sports betting depends on the skills of each team, where a better can see and analyze which makes a skilled bettor have a higher chance of winning.  So it makes sense if one bet $100 per match on sports betting and someone bets a dollar to make 100 spins for a chance to win in a slot.

Even though both games have variables that can change the result of the game, the slot is totally relying on the randomness, unlike sports betting, that often times the team skills often overcome these variables, thus making the prediction of a skilled sports analyst have a greater chance of winning.

It would be just that common sense on trying out to make up some comparison in between slots and sports betting. One should be that sensible enough on what are their main differences in between strategic based and a total luck based game. Speaking about guaranteed win then there's no such thing on gambling world on having that sure win, it might that look one sided specially on sports betting but doesnt mean that it would be that already that giving out that sure win and thats something that you do need up to consider. Always be mindful about the reality of gambling on which the most important thing on here is that you do only that make use of the amount that you can afford to lose on exchange on getting the leisure and fun at the time that you do make out some betting or even doing casino games.

There would be no possibility of getting addicted if you do have that good self control and moderation when it comes into your gambling activity on which it is that in compared into those individuals who are that doing the opposite stuff.

[Samlucky O]

If there is something that has made me not to give in to much to gamble it would be my experiences. As a gamble beginner I started by trying out alot of options and odd choices but I was never a lucky beginner and I'm glad I didn't get to experience that newbies luck that somehow manages to trap most persons because it would have been easy for me to fall for it.

However I have tried betting on huge multipliers and small multipliers and still end up getting disappointed by small multipliers and this brought me to the conclusion that gamble is indeed just for entertainment and not a money making opportunity because tell me why a 1.15 odds will still end up not going as planned.

Surely gambling is for fun and also for making of money but we don't need to totally depend or hope on the money, the money comes up as an unexpected profit. But if you depend on the money as a forefront, you will get disappointed by numerous loses. And for the aspect of odd, no odd is sure, be it small or Big. Even as low as 1.12 odd may still cut because it is not sure. But most times people get carried away by small odds, thinking they have a high possibility to win than big odd where as it is not so. As a matter of fact, some big odd play play than the small odd but since it is seen as a risk, people neglect it and go for the small one in expectation of a sure game.

[Frankolala]

If there is something that has made me not to give in to much to gamble it would be my experiences. As a gamble beginner I started by trying out alot of options and odd choices but I was never a lucky beginner and I'm glad I didn't get to experience that newbies luck that somehow manages to trap most persons because it would have been easy for me to fall for it.
However I have tried betting on huge multipliers and small multipliers and still end up getting disappointed by small multipliers and this brought me to the conclusion that gamble is indeed just for entertainment and not a money making opportunity because tell me why a 1.15 odds will still end up not going as planned.

Don't blame the odds for your losses. Instead, just think that losses are normal in gambling. We all wanted to win but still ended up losing. Besides, nothing could warrant assurance here. If we are lucky, we could win, but if not, we lose. Accept defeat and losses. We all have that bad experience in the world of gambling. However, don't view it negatively, as long as you are here to have fun. But if you are here for money, this will turn you down.

Our predictions mustn't always go as we want it. As gamblers we prefer to keep on winning without losing which is impossible. Even in life, things don't play out the way we want it. We also make wrong decisions that thwart our goals. It's same with gambling, expect losses and not only profits because gambling is two side. Either you win or lose.

[Inior]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

There is nothing like sure odd, when you see anyone offering sure odds, then you should know the person is just deceiving you. When you are gambling when the odd isn’t much, then that doesn’t mean you going to win, your intention might be to just double your money, you might be so sure about the bet which you are about to place, and at the end you still going to lose, so don’t joke with your risk management, and don’t believe anyone that tells you there is anything like sure bet.

That idea of sure odd is just a trap that people fall for probably because someone has been lucky a few times. Those people making those predictions are not gods they just make predictions and it is likely not to play out the way they say it would, and that's when you see comments like "we go again next time" the only reason people fall for this is because of greed to make quick money without having to put in much effort. Maybe there is a need to constantly hold seminar to advise gamblers on how to apply proper risk management and what to expect from gambling.

[Leahized]

The problem too is that, it is very difficult to encounter those big multiplayer on slot but when you luckily hit a big multiplayer with a good wagering amount, the reward can be big just that it's going to take a hell lot of time before you can even experience it. To also hit big in sports is not even so easy.

In this case you are right. It is very difficult to get big multipliers in slot games, which can make a gambler very restless. But yes if you get a big multiplier with a good amount of money a lot of money is possible. But sports batting is different. Because if you bet with higher odds, the chances of winning will decrease. In every match there are strong and weak teams, And in case of strong team the odds are less and in case of weak team the odds are much higher. However in gambling we have to consider the money side because of self control.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

No, mate, it's not just small odds that is referred to as sure odd, I have received 5 draws prediction labeled as sure odd but I didn't take the bet since I was not convinced on the outcome of all 5 games to be draw, but at the end, that bet was lost for people that staked on it, but the reason why I won it was because I changed the prediction of two teams to home wins and that was what gave me success. If I had not review the games on my own and made the little adjustment I did, I would have lost it too just like others. So, any body can decide to give you a game and call it sure odd, even though the odds are big.

[ZeroVinsonN]

People often refer to the small multiplier as "sure odd", while in reality no odd is actually too sure. Small multiplier just give an edge of the outcome to likely come true, it’s not certainty. All multipliers carry risk (both small and big). Small multipliers reduces volatility, it doesn’t eradicate the risks. So yes I’ll agree, small multipliers doesn’t guarantee a win.

Nothing guarantees a win in gambling, that's what makes it even more interesting, the spontaneity of it, challenging yourself to be able to predict something that's supposed to be difficult to predict. The mistake people make is to assume that smaller odds mean easy win but they forgot to understand that these odds are placed by humans as well and there is no certainty to it playing out the way they claim it will, the best thing to do is to stake on what you believe is most likely to play out.