Hard truth what everybody ignores but thats the power winners and losers

[Oneone1]

The "Losers": Nations Led by Inherited Wealth and Oligarchy
Based on the theory that leaders born into extreme wealth may lack the "survivalist" instincts necessary for long-term national resilience, several nations currently face stagnation. Or atleast those leaders should have people with a lot real life experince people to advice them.

Thats why now the most powerful country will be Poland: Since the fall of Communism, Poland has been led largely by individuals who rose through the "Solidarity" movement or professional ranks without inherited wealth. This "struggle-based" leadership has transformed Poland into a rising European power with a projected GDP growth that rivals older Western economies.

That's why someone like trump can't make usa great because he come from background of a lot resources so person dont have much idea of reality and working from nothing to something.

Uk, russia , usa will fail big and most of europe if they dont understood this theory, the EU spokes person kaja kallas is real example she comes from wealthy family and she has no ideas what are reality of life and allready many will laugh about her and not taking seriously.

If you take all this in account poland will be good place to invest money in over the next years.- no wonder why usa want to be close to poland so much because poland leadership are real people who got real life experince.

Ofc, usa and uk might want to make poland as ruler for their front because of capabilities of poland people but then again poland might ask why to make someone rich with our brain experince and work ? So most likely poland will not be submissive.

[Fullbear2222]

The "Losers": Nations Led by Inherited Wealth and Oligarchy
Based on the theory that leaders born into extreme wealth may lack the "survivalist" instincts necessary for long-term national resilience, several nations currently face stagnation. Or atleast those leaders should have people with a lot real life experince people to advice them.

Thats why now the most powerful country will be Poland: Since the fall of Communism, Poland has been led largely by individuals who rose through the "Solidarity" movement or professional ranks without inherited wealth. This "struggle-based" leadership has transformed Poland into a rising European power with a projected GDP growth that rivals older Western economies.

That's why someone like trump can't make usa great because he come from background of a lot resources so person dont have much idea of reality and working from nothing to something.

Uk, russia , usa will fail big and most of europe if they dont understood this theory, the EU spokes person kaja kallas is real example she comes from wealthy family and she has no ideas what are reality of life and allready many will laugh about her and not taking seriously.

If you take all this in account poland will be good place to invest money in over the next years.- no wonder why usa want to be close to poland so much because poland leadership are real people who got real life experince.

Ofc, usa and uk might want to make poland as ruler for their front because of capabilities of poland people but then again poland might ask why to make someone rich with our brain experince and work ? So most likely poland will not be submissive.

Thats well known info
Intelligence services and political consultants often seek out "street-smart" individuals or those with "lived experience"
Ofc, they looking for those who will be brain behind moves no wonder why usa staying for that long successful only way that they got to have some people behind who got real life experince.

[BADecker]

People who are born into wealth only keep it because they have smart wealth managers who make their living off keeping the wealthy wealthy.

[passwordnow]

The "Losers": Nations Led by Inherited Wealth and Oligarchy
Based on the theory that leaders born into extreme wealth may lack the "survivalist" instincts necessary for long-term national resilience, several nations currently face stagnation. Or atleast those leaders should have people with a lot real life experince people to advice them.

There are studies I think that even not leaders, anyone who's born with extreme wealth. They become entitled people and they're far more from the reality of what the majority is dealing with. The kind of living they have is totally different compared to what those plebs kind of life. That's why if it's with these leaders, it's best for the people to chose that have really an experience in the ground and understands the situation of a normal person. Because if these kinds of people don't know what people are going through, only the oligarchs are the ones that shall benefit from such leadership.

[Joy- maker]

Note, I am not here to make comparison, but you made some valid points. Before now, I always say this things that, someone who is born into wealth, as in someone who comes from a wealthy home will hardly make a good leader. But that doesn't mean that those Born into wealth can't become good leaders, they can if only they are ready to take responsibility, understand those from different backgrounds, and not to feel entitled. And according to how I see things from my perspective, I believe that those who are not born into wealth make good leaders than those born into wealth. Others users are still free to share their own 2 cent (opinions) on this matter.

[Mhizlove]

For me I will say that leadership comes from those who have experienced real life hustle or struggle because they think more better for the future because they understand the risk,the sacrifice and to plan well with this kind of mindset tells the country that will not move forward and that's what have been a help to Poland.

Then talking about the wealthy or let me say the elites is not that they can't be leaders but I don't think the country can move forward because elites grow up with everything risk losing a little touch of reality, with this kind of disconnection it might weaken the trust and future directions

[Merit.s]

This is happening because those wealthy people lacks the fear of God and human sympathy. I could remember in the olden days, children from wealthy families abandoned their wealth and live with the poor as if they don't have anything because they gave up everything to serve God by going to the seminary to become priests but these days it's different, the rich wants to become richer.

Anyone from a wealthy family that's not a good leader was never a good leader by nature and not because he's wealthy. In my country, majority of the past leaders are from a poor family and they suffered before they became leaders but they did the worse than those that were wealthy before becoming a leader. It's the mindset of the person and not wealth.

[Solodoski]

For me I will say that leadership comes from those who have experienced real life hustle or struggle for think more better for the future because the understand the risk,the sacrifice and to plan well with this kind of mindset tell the country that will not move forward and that's what have been a help to Poland.

Then talking about the wealthy or let me say the elites is not that they can't be leaders but I don't think the country can move forward because elites grow up with everything risk losing a little touch of reality, with this kind of disconnection it might weaken the trust and future directions

This is wrong. It is better to accept someone who has tested wealth as a leader than a hungry man, you will be surprised what the hungry man will do if he becomes a leader. Have you not heard of the parable that says " the devil you know is better than the angel you dont know".

The wealthy leader first is not after the wealth but after power. Meanwhile they force everything to recover the money spent on their campaign, after that they make other plans but at least create opportunities, while the hungry leader will steal as much money he can, put his family and relations in top positions.

[Roseline492]

For me I will say that leadership comes from those who have experienced real life hustle or struggle for think more better for the future because the understand the risk,the sacrifice and to plan well with this kind of mindset tell the country that will not move forward and that's what have been a help to Poland.

In other words it could also be better from people who have not undergone any suffering on their life's because for those who haven't experience harsh living will not have reason to lead there country into bad situation because they weren't lacking before they were elected so there shouldn't be anything that would corrupt there mind through money because they already have wealth that is built everywhere but is very unfortunate that those whom were not supposed to dip into the finance of the country are the ones behaving like people whom came from a place were they have never seen a million before.

[Fullbear2222]

Note, I am not here to make comparison, but you made some valid points. Before now, I always say this things that, someone who is born into wealth, as in someone who comes from a wealthy home will hardly make a good leader. But that doesn't mean that those Born into wealth can't become good leaders, they can if only they are ready to take responsibility, understand those from different backgrounds, and not to feel entitled. And according to how I see things from my perspective, I believe that those who are not born into wealth make good leaders than those born into wealth. Others users are still free to share their own 2 cent (opinions) on this matter.

Look norway it use to be poor country but they worked hard and now they are rich they have build also one of the secure sovering fund smart actions and good calculations.
Yes it seems poland is next successful nation because its not about inheritance and just ownership but also solving the real life problems and innovation.
We tend to live in short memory we tend to think world is only 30 years old thats the most timeline what people see in their adult life time but we should understood stagnasion and no innovation will halt all the old success and empires just ending up first to use all their old wealth and resources then they will even sell all what is valueble and then resources depleted culture gone power gone and national strengh weakened.

Leaders now understood this all but for many it might be too late.

Uk and many other failed on this a lot.