I do not go to other members posts and harass.
You go way beyond that,
harassing forum members outside of the forum,
sending threats via PM, and continuing to contact them after they've told you to stop. If you're going to trash highly respected users of the forum over your non-understanding of how the forum works, I'm not going to let you get away with it. You are not free from criticism here. Start another self-moderated thread if that's what you want.
I'm guessing this is what people should expect when dealing with you:
if you come to an online forum and write someone "i will meet you" " will meet you soon" "ill send cops on you" and other bs, you enter the war zone. You put yourself in a position of where you at and do not be surprised that people call you a di**head.
Get a helmet man.
Nutildah, respectfully, if you are not part of a gang, I hope your response is executed equally. If you dont think DireWolfM14 and anonymousminer are attempting to trash my reputation then you are full of yourself. Howard, is a great person and friend to me personally and to the forum. He doesn't let the wolfs dog on people. If your response is not equal I'll have something to add.
I think that good comment for every report is already good enough. More people doing this would already be great. Having an AI agent doing 75% of the work and humans only checking its output is even more desirable (although it's probably not what OP intends).
I don't think that a "title" is needed for this (it can overcomplicate the things and (as already seen) it can lead to wrong expectations, or misunderstanding, or attacks) and the reward can be next year(s) in the community awards.
So while (as you see) I don't fully agree the concept, I do acknowledge OP willingness to help and I think that it's a nice gesture, the rest are details that can be discussed/improved/simplified.
And about the OP question, no, sorry, I don't have enough free time to volunteer for being mini-mod, however, good luck in the endeavor of fighting spam!
Thank you, NeuroticFich.
I appreciate you addressing the topic and not forcing me to fight separate battles in unrelated threads. It goes a long ways. You exemplify higher standards and I believe everyone can clearly see the difference.
It's fair for you to disagree with my implementation of spam or AI spam enforcement. I opened this discussion to get valuable feedback from members exactly like yourself who are willing to share their ideas without tearing others down or attacking them personally. It's great when that happens because it is like something gets done.
What's sad to me is that I can hardly talk on topic at times because I have to address my biggest fans which just happen to be DT1 trolls. It's unfortunate.
In the end, I just want to encourage the community to fight spam in a more open way. More eyes on the matter, more honestly about AI usage and less biases.