Stake.bet.ar [Argentina Seeding event]

[Stunna]

I'm back on bitcointalk that can mean only one thing... Welcome to yet another another seeding event. This time for our stake.bet.ar . As always props to Rhavar the creator of crash for the method.

To prove our fairness we have generated a chain of 20,000,000 SHA256 hashes where each hash is the hash of the hexadecimal representation of the previous hash. The last hash in the chain is:
Slide:  42fb6a93e263b95a44512ce30c6164cc41cdb300798b1ae78ed7746855331818
Crash: bf7f7c6f5364e5f1c5bdb97dbbf1136c04a50762d0794fe06d62d52aa11c7c12

The formula for generating the game result:

Code:

const gameHash = hashChain.pop()

const hmac = createHmac('sha256', gameHash);

// blockHash is the hash of bitcoin block 584,500

hmac.update(blockHash);

const hex = hmac.digest('hex').substr(0, 8);
const int = parseInt(hex, 16);

// 0.01 will result in 1% house edge with a lowest crashpoint of 1

const crashpoint = Math.max(1, (2 ** 32 / (int + 1)) * (1 - 0.01))

blockHash used is Bitcoin block 939,547 which has not been mined at time of posting. Basically we are using the hash of a future bitcoin block as a client seed so players can be certain that we did not pick one in the house's favor. I'd appreciate it if someone could quote this post so this is all set in stone.

[AussieMat]

I'm back on bitcointalk that can mean only one thing... Welcome to yet another another seeding event. This time for our stake.bet.ar . As always props to Rhavar the creator of crash for the method.

To prove our fairness we have generated a chain of 20,000,000 SHA256 hashes where each hash is the hash of the hexadecimal representation of the previous hash. The last hash in the chain is:
Slide:  42fb6a93e263b95a44512ce30c6164cc41cdb300798b1ae78ed7746855331818
Crash: bf7f7c6f5364e5f1c5bdb97dbbf1136c04a50762d0794fe06d62d52aa11c7c12

The formula for generating the game result:

Code:

const gameHash = hashChain.pop()

const hmac = createHmac('sha256', gameHash);

// blockHash is the hash of bitcoin block 584,500

hmac.update(blockHash);

const hex = hmac.digest('hex').substr(0, 8);
const int = parseInt(hex, 16);

// 0.01 will result in 1% house edge with a lowest crashpoint of 1

const crashpoint = Math.max(1, (2 ** 32 / (int + 1)) * (1 - 0.01))

blockHash used is Bitcoin block 939,547 which has not been mined at time of posting. Basically we are using the hash of a future bitcoin block as a client seed so players can be certain that we did not pick one in the house's favor. I'd appreciate it if someone could quote this post so this is all set in stone.

There you have it:) by the way congrats on having the provably fair really solid unlike many other casinos, I’ve created a thread here that compares casinos for provably fair: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5571224.msg66282437#msg66282437

[Haunebu]

I don't really care much about these seeding events though I can see how they are useful to many others. Would be much, much better to see you and your team being more active here in the forum actively addressing complaints(Especially the KYC ones).

That's just wishful thinking on my part, but one can hope. It's great to see how far Stake improved with time, but this is one area which still needs a ton of improvement.

[Stunna]

Boom our block is in

0000000000000000000094e045cf1f0b035d81afe139faa67f6218ed1004ebe1

I don't really care much about these seeding events though I can see how they are useful to many others. Would be much, much better to see you and your team being more active here in the forum actively addressing complaints(Especially the KYC ones).

That's just wishful thinking on my part, but one can hope. It's great to see how far Stake improved with time, but this is one area which still needs a ton of improvement.

This is helpful feedback, will try to spend some more time on here again and better resolve these issues.

There you have it:) by the way congrats on having the provably fair really solid unlike many other casinos, I’ve created a thread here that compares casinos for provably fair: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5571224.msg66282437#msg66282437

Thank you! We have a pretty significant provably fair update coming soon   It's been a long term goal of ours since starting primedice in 2013 to push all operators towards a provably fair standard and we are in a position now as the world's largest casino where we can better influence other operators.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

LOL, who would care about an "Argentina seeding event"??

You have other areas that need attention. Unclaimable telegram drops, you still use the same claim amounts even though you raised the wager and the player base went up significantly. So why still the same low claim amounts?
Poker also needs so much work and the rake is 40% higher than on other sites, actually it's even higher when you take the high cap into account.
And yeah, the bonus have been cut into oblivion, which makes stake less and less interesting for people that wager a lot.

I was once very active on stake, medium platinum 6 account with 5 years of activity, I was even in your signature campaign in here. But at some place I just got fed up with all the nonsense stake does.

[rohang]

Boom our block is in

0000000000000000000094e045cf1f0b035d81afe139faa67f6218ed1004ebe1

I don't really care much about these seeding events though I can see how they are useful to many others. Would be much, much better to see you and your team being more active here in the forum actively addressing complaints(Especially the KYC ones).

That's just wishful thinking on my part, but one can hope. It's great to see how far Stake improved with time, but this is one area which still needs a ton of improvement.

This is helpful feedback, will try to spend some more time on here again and better resolve these issues.
 goal of ours since starting primedice in 2013 to push all operators towards a provably fair standard and we are in a position now as the world's

Highly doubt that, prove me wrong but stake is obviously too big now for you or eddie to bother with these type of issues

[Hispo]

Boom our block is in

0000000000000000000094e045cf1f0b035d81afe139faa67f6218ed1004ebe1

I don't really care much about these seeding events though I can see how they are useful to many others. Would be much, much better to see you and your team being more active here in the forum actively addressing complaints(Especially the KYC ones).

That's just wishful thinking on my part, but one can hope. It's great to see how far Stake improved with time, but this is one area which still needs a ton of improvement.

This is helpful feedback, will try to spend some more time on here again and better resolve these issues.
 goal of ours since starting primedice in 2013 to push all operators towards a provably fair standard and we are in a position now as the world's

Highly doubt that, prove me wrong but stake is obviously too big now for you or eddie to bother with these type of issues

Actually, I have a completely point of view for all this situation.
I like Stake and it's original team of founders can have a minimum of time to spend here among users of this community which were so important for them in the beginning of their gambling business.

Also, if they spend more time here on this community, they will be more likely to be exposition to feedback from all gamblers from here.

I personally welcome any event which is brought to us by the management of stake.

[rohang]

Boom our block is in

0000000000000000000094e045cf1f0b035d81afe139faa67f6218ed1004ebe1

I don't really care much about these seeding events though I can see how they are useful to many others. Would be much, much better to see you and your team being more active here in the forum actively addressing complaints(Especially the KYC ones).

That's just wishful thinking on my part, but one can hope. It's great to see how far Stake improved with time, but this is one area which still needs a ton of improvement.

This is helpful feedback, will try to spend some more time on here again and better resolve these issues.
 goal of ours since starting primedice in 2013 to push all operators towards a provably fair standard and we are in a position now as the world's

Highly doubt that, prove me wrong but stake is obviously too big now for you or eddie to bother with these type of issues

Actually, I have a completely point of view for all this situation.
I like Stake and it's original team of founders can have a minimum of time to spend here among users of this community which were so important for them in the beginning of their gambling business.

Also, if they spend more time here on this community, they will be more likely to be exposition to feedback from all gamblers from here.

I personally welcome any event which is brought to us by the management of stake.

Yea not gonna happen bro. Do u use stake? Just look at how their old players are treated nowadays. Its not what it used to be