Jud-EX.com - selective scam - Order not found.

[QI2FY]

What happened::
After completing several successful BTC-to-XMR swaps, I initiated another transaction on Jud-EX.com on February 25 for 1.00662 BTC to XMR. I saved the order ID (QI2FY), sent the BTC, and the website initially confirmed the deposit. Unexpectedly, upon refreshing the page, the order status changed to "Order not found." Over a week later, despite multiple emails, I have not received the 200 XMR or a refund of my 1.00662 BTC. Jud-EX claims no record of the order exists, yet blockchain evidence confirms my funds were diverted with a 99.8% fee.
Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2737506
Reference Link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5575040.0
Amount Scammed:
1.00662 BTC
Payment Method:
BTC
Proof of Payment:
https://explorer.near-intents.org/transactions/19E4fRzjKZZW14xzjU4YWGCeCoogPqkVb3
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:
Selectively scamming. See https://en.antiswap.io/exchanger/Jud-ex?type=negative&sort=DESC

[rat03gopoh]

I saw your complaint in the announcement thread. It seems the representative has been active recently but hasn't responded to anything (maybe he doesn't want to). I suggest raising a type 2 flag (guidelines⁽¹⁾) and getting support for the flag through dedicated topic⁽²⁾ by posting links to the active flag and this topic.

1) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156835
2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445

[JeromeTash]

I have tagged their profile to warn others. Now please create a flag against their profile as advised so that we can support it. It is more effective in alerting potential victims about their service when they look at their ANN.

I don't think they will really care about their reputation. They will probably just move on to the next domain name, but this will help protect other users who may not know.

[Zwei]

wtf OP, why would you send 1 bitcoin to some random ass exchange?
they have not been around for even a month, the domain was registered just 2 weeks ago.



i'm sorry for your loss, but you kind of were asking to get scammed honestly.
man, i hope it's an amount you can afford losing.

I saw your complaint in the announcement thread. It seems the representative has been active recently but hasn't responded to anything (maybe he doesn't want to). I suggest raising a type 2 flag (guidelines⁽¹⁾) and getting support for the flag through dedicated topic⁽²⁾ by posting links to the active flag and this topic.

he should create a type 3 flag actually.

[QI2FY]

Support this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3495

[rat03gopoh]

he should create a type 3 flag actually.

Does it make sense to raise 2 flags?
The Bitcoin the OP sent ended up in a Near-Intents hot wallet, which then returned only 2,365,57,356 LTC. I suspect most of the BTC was confiscated, while the other transactions always returned nearly the equal exchange amount.
In their ToS (point 7) and and reiterated in their post, they limit their liability, including confiscation by external party. However, I previously quoted their post stating that they would be liable for small amount confiscation incident and would add this clause to the ToS (which hasn't been added yet). The problem is, they aren't very specific about the small amounts they can handle. That's why I suggested the type2 flag.

[The Cryptovator]

Should I believe this accusation? Pretty confusing to me; I'm not sure if it's either a smear campaign or negative marketing. How could a user swap such a big amount with a brand new exchange? One Bitcoin isn't a small amount, and they aren't well reputed on the forum or outside the forum as well. Then how dare you swap this big amount with them?

Please provide more appropriate evidence except transaction hashes. If I were you, then probably I would record a video when swapping 1 Bitcoin with this exchange. But it's true, I won't choose that exchange. Rather, I would exchange on a big exchange or try with a small exchange, though I have to spend more fees. If it's true, then I'm really sorry for your losses. We can't say anything unless the exchange replies here and refunds you.

[Trêvoid]

https://xenaps.com/service/detail/jud-ex/
https://kurs.expert/ru/obmennik/jud-ex-com/feedbacks.html
https://carigold.com/forum/threads/jud-ex-com-cryptocurrency-exchange-service.709663/
https://www.okchanger.com/exchangers/Jud-ex-com
https://www.bestexchangers.ru/ru/detail.html?xobmen=812
https://mmgp.com/threads/obmennik-kriptovaljut-jud-ex-com-vygodnye-kursy-obmena-bitcoin.644387/
https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/160264-jud-excom-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA-%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%82-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7-aml-%D0%B8-kyc/
https://pro-obmen.ru/jud-ex

Please use the links above and include information about the scam. We need to reach as many people as possible so no one else falls into their trap. They’re still operating, and their system is active. Once we spread the scam everywhere, they’ll be forced to shut down their site.

[JeromeTash]

Should I believe this accusation? Pretty confusing to me; I'm not sure if it's either a smear campaign or negative marketing.

'
The service is actually a scam and has been labelled as scam in some other platforms so I don't think OP is trying to do a smear campaign

How could a user swap such a big amount with a brand new exchange?

Unfortunately, some people trust too quickly. This has been happening even in the past.

Please provide more appropriate evidence except transaction hashes.

I don't think he will be able to do that since the order status changed to "Order not found." But the transaction hash does help connect some dots. Their rep in this forum was online a few days back and did not even bother to counter the accusation.

[albon]

Should I believe this accusation? Pretty confusing to me; I'm not sure if it's either a smear campaign or negative marketing. How could a user swap such a big amount with a brand new exchange? One Bitcoin isn't a small amount, and they aren't well reputed on the forum or outside the forum as well. Then how dare you swap this big amount with them?

Please provide more appropriate evidence except transaction hashes. If I were you, then probably I would record a video when swapping 1 Bitcoin with this exchange. But it's true, I won't choose that exchange. Rather, I would exchange on a big exchange or try with a small exchange, though I have to spend more fees. If it's true, then I'm really sorry for your losses. We can't say anything unless the exchange replies here and refunds you.

I will prove that to you instead of the OP.

A short while ago, I converted $1 worth of NEAR [0.7751938] into LTC.

 [FULL SCREENSHOT]

Here is the order link for the transaction I made:
https://jud-ex.com/en/order/HEXQ4

​My Recipient Address: ltc1q07uts24dm4k6m5vnp5y5af5qlgjrc23pdfkghu

And this is the TXID:
https://explorer.near-intents.org/transactions/612815da25699c5de060041e16a4aff3f3aca7252768b2e0592fd73800dcb579

If you open the transaction link and click on “View All Swap Steps”, you will see that the funds were sent to solver-priv-liq.near, which is indeed the same wallet address from which the OP received the Litecoin.

--------------------------



The screenshots reveal a textbook UI Overlay Scam. While the main transaction page displays 1.006 BTC ($69k), the internal 'Swap Steps' processed by solver-priv-liq.near clearly show that only 0.002 BTC ($138) was actually moved. TXID: https://explorer.near-intents.org/transactions/19E4fRzjKZZW14xzjU4YWGCeCoogPqkVb3
--------------------------


Proof that Jud-EX uses the same 'solver-priv-liq.near' address right now.

Here is the conclusive video evidence I recorded. It documents the entire process from the Jud-EX interface to the blockchain, proving the link between the site and the fraudulent addresses: https://streamable.com/ebtnt3