Geopoliticial instablity would lead to problems in internet and currencies. I think cash would become king. Internet comes when stability is established and hence crypto gets less importance here.
There have been thread discussing what whether bitcoin would rise in public use when countries get damaged after wars. The general answer to this is that after wars and all, the immediate focus is going to be daily needs, sanitation and healthcare and not things inside the internet bubble.
You made valid points there, in extreme conflict situations where infrastructure is damaged, basic needs will obviously take priority and even internet access can become unreliable. In those cases, cash and essential goods naturally become the immediate focus.
But I wonder if crypto’s role might appear more in the surrounding conditions rather than the front line of conflict for example cross-border transfers, donations, or moving funds when traditional banking systems become restricted.
Networks like Bitcoin still require internet access, but in regions where connectivity remains available, they can provide an alternative when financial systems become unstable.
Maybe crypto becomes a parallel tool for people who still have digital access.