LitecoinII (LC2) - LFG!!!

[LitecoinII_dev]

⚠️ MANDATORY UPDATE

LitecoinII Core v0.21.6.0


LitecoinII Core v0.21.6.0 is now available.

This mandatory release activates the new custom LWMA difficulty adjustment algorithm at block height 62,585.

Main changes:

• Dynamic difficulty adjustment on every block
• Improved block-time stability
• Better response to sudden hashrate changes
• Updated checkpoints and synchronization parameters

All miners, pools, exchanges, explorers, node operators, and wallet service providers must upgrade before activation to remain on the correct chain.

Download: LitecoinII Core v0.21.6.0

Please upgrade as soon as possible.

[NitroPool]

⚡ LitecoinII (LC2) is now live on NitroPool! ⚡

NitroPool is excited to welcome LitecoinII (LC2), with globally distributed Scrypt mining available across our Australian, European and US stratums.

Algorithm: Scrypt

Mining Modes: PROP & SOLO

Available Regions:

🇦🇺 AU: stratum+tcp://au.nitropool.net:3439

🇪🇺 EU: stratum+tcp://eu.nitropool.net:3439

🇺🇸 US: stratum+tcp://us.nitropool.net:3439

Why mine LC2 on NitroPool?

✔ Compatible with small hobby miners through to large ASIC farms

✔ Smart miner detection and adaptive difficulty

✔ Low-latency regional stratums in Australia, Europe and the USA

✔ PROP and SOLO mining modes

✔ Mining-rental compatible

✔ Full support for LC2 MWEB-enabled block templates

Whether you are running a compact home miner or managing a large Scrypt ASIC farm, NitroPool automatically adapts the connection to suit your hardware.

https://nitropool.net

Happy mining! ⛏️

[internetional]

Following the results of our recent community poll, LitecoinII will move forward with replacing the current 2016-block difficulty adjustment algorithm.

I have a few questions about the community poll and how decisions are made:

1. Where exactly was the poll conducted?
2. Who was eligible to vote?
3. Was it one vote per person, or was voting power based on coin holdings, hashrate, or some other factor?
4. How many people participated in the poll?
5. What level of support was considered sufficient for the proposal to pass?
6. Was the outcome of the poll binding on the developer, or was it only advisory?
7. Who ultimately has the authority to approve the change and merge it into the code?