Gamblers are winning and casino try to stop them by replacing the dealer

[YOSHIE]

Crazy run by this gamblers, but sooner or later casinos will have to stop them. Their method? Change the dealer to disrupt everything, you can hear it that the gamblers wanted that dealer back but they say that he will just take a break.

Why don't the gamblers stop making bets, if they already know the dealer is no longer playing for them, they should be able to end the game if the initial dealer is no longer playing.

Things like this often happen in physical casinos, where in the middle of the game the dealer is replaced by a new dealer, in general this should be suspicious, right, most people gamble physically and visit the casino house, just for fun, they are free to choose the dealer or female waiter at their pleasure, they have the right to refuse if they don't like it.

I don't think there is anything binding there, casinos have to think about the comfort of their customers, whether the gambler wins or loses.

[coin-investor]

I think it is to disrupt the momentum; it's a weird tactic, but the casino may suspect connivance, so they break that by replacing the dealer with another one.

I will also quit the moment management wants to change something, even if the changes won't affect the outcome; you don't want an interruption in how you do things right.

Some gamblers are superstitious; if they are winning under certain circumstances, they will stick with it and abandon it if they see a change.

[danherbias07]

It's a type of mental trick. The same happens in different card games where a dealer is needed.

I remember playing "Sakla". A game that is known during funerals here in our country, and whenever the dealer is having a bad consecutive loss, or let's say he is putting the winning marker on a card with most big bettors on it, they suddenly change the banker.
On the sidelines, you will hear the bettors change their prediction, and they might also change the way they will bet. They might restart from betting low amounts and then work their way up. Then, as soon as they read the new dealer (although that is only superstitious), they go for high stakes.

Just a change of dealer made them doubt their own instincts.

[Cryptomultiplier]

I think it is to disrupt the momentum; it's a weird tactic, but the casino may suspect connivance, so they break that by replacing the dealer with another one.

I will also quit the moment management wants to change something, even if the changes won't affect the outcome; you don't want an interruption in how you do things right.

Some gamblers are superstitious; if they are winning under certain circumstances, they will stick with it and abandon it if they see a change.

It's indeed weird and no different from online casino platforms that would restrict or suspend a gamblers account because such a gambler wins too much and the casino has to do something to break the winning streak or claim to investigate why the gambler is winning too much.

This is one reason why in the terms and conditions of many casino, they favour themselves from every angle, hence why the saying 'the house always wins or house edge advantage '.

It's understandably frustrating, but I think the aim is to disorientate the gambler and mentally test their psyche.

[OgNasty]

Dealers get breaks and are changed often due to them standing and having a job that forces them to maintain strict attention on what they are doing. I don’t think some dealers are lucky or the casino changes them out due to circumstances of their players. The dealer doesn’t affect the outcome, or shouldn’t, so this is an odd claim.

[michellee]

If that is happens, winners should try other methods and he can asks to stop for a while and saying that he need to take a break after playing for some rounds. He really tired and can't continue gambling without a break so that is normal to have that reason. The casino can't stop gambler to stop with that reason but I don't know, I don't have experienced like that.

Casinos will stops the winners from winning more by replacing the dealer and to disrupt the games. That is the things that casino will do as casinos don't want to lose much. Stopping the game if the dealer replace will be the only way to stop your lose.

[hyudien]

From a logical point of view, changing dealers does not make your luck or your winning streak disappear, because in the game of roulette even if the dealer is changed, it will never affect the results, the dealer only drops the ball and the machine operates it, well from a superstitious point of view, there is a possibility that the dealer who was changed was in bad condition or on an unlucky day, so maybe that's why the dealer changed him, but I think it's all just a coincidence, maybe by the time the day was changed your winning streak had ended.

[tabas]

If it's in a physical casino, there are surveillance cameras there that have people behind it monitoring almost each gamblers who have been winning. When someone is in luck and they're winning so much to the games that they're playing, they'll alert the people in the field and have the dealer to be replaced. Even the customers will beg not to do that, it's part of the operations and strategy of the casino. If the gamblers have the strategies on how they're going to win like them, the casinos have a way to counter the luck of their gamblers such as stated in the situation.

[Smartprofit]

Some believe the dealer can throw the ball into any slot they want. 🙋 If this is true, then roulette isn't a random number generator.

Even if the dealer doesn't directly favor players, they can still bankrupt the casino. After all, if winning at roulette isn't just a random number between 0 and 36, but a number the dealer intentionally throws (even without realizing it), then it can be predicted. This requires long-term observation of a specific dealer's actions.

This is why casinos periodically change the dealer at each gaming table. It's a perfectly reasonable measure. It prevents the casino from going broke. 🎰

[SmartGold01]

One thing a gambler should realize is their maximum time to spend on gambling, maximum amount to win while gamble and whenever they have seen about 50 percentage of what they projected on gambling it is advisable to at least, give a break to enable them have a fresh thinking, even though they have this mindset that today is their winning day, so they should keep rolling till they sees the ending. This is not good, people should know when to call it a day and focused on other things on in their life.

[IsraelK]

Crazy run by this gamblers, but sooner or later casinos will have to stop them. Their method? Change the dealer to disrupt everything, you can hear it that the gamblers wanted that dealer back but they say that he will just take a break.

And obviously the new dealer will have different throws and so they stop this gamblers from continuing their winning streak.

https://img.youtube.com/vi/ANc0N-1zMpQ/0.jpg

This is roulette by the way, I have this kind of experience, not that I'm winning big, but I have played before wherein me and my buddies are in a streak then suddenly they've change the lady dealer and so after that, we lost after one spin with the new dealer and I told them that we better stop and take the profits and that's what we did.

This is exactly what scares me in gambling: if you are winning consistently, you are either perceived as a fraud or they find a way to stop you from winning. Because of the fear of finding myself in a situation like this, I am sticking with bitcoin-betting, please.

[Judith87403]

In games such like Roulette, to change the dealer normally do not have any effect on the actual odds. The result is still random as long as the wheel and processes are fair. Casinos mostly rotate dealers just for reasons of routine like shift schedules, breaks, or to avoid tiredness.

Nevertheless, from a point of view of psychology, players on the a winning streak can feel the change has disrupt their rhythm or luck. Such perception is common in every gambling environments.

For real, no dealer can steadily control where the ball lands in present casino setups. Therefore while stopping once you have profited, just like you have done, is a wise move of discipline, the dealer change itself likely did not alter the odds mathematically in the game.

[EluguHcman]

Does this happen to be just a coincidence or was the dealer of the casino actually influencing the outcome of the session?
I completely get why those gamblers would have liked to continue to have the same dealer, because they assume the dealer themselves was their "charm".

It is actually kind of silly as well how the casino played into these superstitions and opted to change the dealer.

I wonder if those dealers ended up being fired for allegedly manipulating the game in favor of gamblers...

You made good point that should give a clarity why the casino might think to change the dealer because winning streak in such game as roulette or any casino game providers should be suspicion of being manipulated.
On that regards in a live roulette provider, the casino could change the dealer to disrupt the alleged profitable manipulations deal between the player and the dealer.
Such employee also deserves firing penalty.

Definitely if the player is of the luck to win genuinely, no matter how much they change the dealer they would keep up to their steak wins unless there is a superstitious belief there that they derives their lucks from the specified dealer.

[noorman0]

I think it's purely an attempt to psychologically influence gamblers, or casinos are superstitious, lol. If not, perhaps the casinos see something suspicious about the dealers.
After all, cases of collusion between gamblers and dealers have been reported several times. So changing the dealer's shift could be reasonable and not against the rules of the game.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

In a situation where I am experiencing a wining streak and the casino chose to change the deal, I will only play for 2-4 round as testing to see how it goes and when it's not going well, I will also demand to take my profit because it's quite obvious that when they change the dealer, they were not satisfied with your win and wants you to start losing, so, once I just experience small lose, I'm calling it off for that day.

[Richbased]

Gambling can be strange sometimes, it may not really be that they have any ulterior motive by changing the dealer but since your mind didn't accept the new dealer, it definitely gonna affect the way you think which will lead to bad results. I haven't played roulette yet, if i did, i would have gotten a clarity whether the results can be manipulated. However, their are some dealers that you can get lucky when they are incharge and there are also some that you will find it difficult to win. Similar thing has happened to me sometime ago when i went to a gambling place to bet on virtual football events, i was winning with the croupier that i was placing my stakes on but when she was changed and and another croupier took over, i was losing immensely and i began to question why the first croupier was changed. So it happens but it doesn't affect the games since they are not the ones that programmed it.

[Bright0515]

Its better to quit either immediately or few rounds after the previous dealer has been replaced. It's obvious that they don't want you to win then why not quit. Although winning doesn't always come which means in one way or the other you will have to lose but in an obvious scenario when casino don't want you to maintain your winning streak, all you have to do is quit so that you don't lose back the money you won.

[salad daging]

Changing the dealer only affects the player's mindset, not the game outcome. Even with a new dealer, the results stayed the same which proves the odds don't really change. Sure, it might just be a normal shift schedule, but casinos know the mental effect it has on players. After all, roulette is purely random so a new dealer shouldn't change the odds at all.

But the player has a belief pattern that the previous dealer brought him luck so he believes he will continue to give a series of wins, with this belief, the suggestion becomes strong for the player, even though the casino replaces the dealer with a new one, the results are the same, but the players will consider the different hands of the dealer.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

They tried to replace the dealer after the guys won 5 times in a row, which is a massive win, not just small ones, raising $25k in chips up to $500k. Plus, it was something in the casino; they tried to call the dealer out. Maybe they thought he was contributing to the guys' winning luck, and after he came back, the guys completely lost in their last hand. The 6th hand was not a complete loss since the bet amount was covered, and before they decided to end and cash out, they were left with them still going home with $550,000.

With the way you explain, it is obvious you actually watched the full YouTube video, but I literally just watched just a few in the beginning, and I must say that walking away with the remaining $550,000 after they lost the 6th round was actually the best decision they did because had it been they had continue playing with the mindset that they might be luck just like when playing with the first dealer, I'm 100% sure they would have lost their entire money. However, I think what happened their is just a pure coincidence and luck, but it is obvious the casino operators might have thought the dealer was influencing the winnings, and that's why they brought in their best dealer,  to ensure making it tough for those guys to keep winning.

[Findingnemo]

Or it could be true the dealer really wanted to take a break?

Or they are trying to disrupt the flow which is understandable from the casino's perspective because they just want to make more money and will not be happy if someone is draining their revenue.