Gamblers are winning and casino try to stop them by replacing the dealer

[purple_sparkles]

Every business has its own strategy, and replacing one dealer with another is not necessarily a specially planned action for a particular situation. It could be a previously prepared scenario for such cases, or simply part of the work schedule, after all, people need breaks and clearly defined working hours.All people need time to sit down, rest, have a drink or a meal, and go to the toilet. So yes, it does happen that a dealer who seemed lucky can be replaced by another one.

[serjent05]

Or it could be true the dealer really wanted to take a break?

Or they are trying to disrupt the flow which is understandable from the casino's perspective because they just want to make more money and will not be happy if someone is draining their revenue.

But it was a roulette, we all know that the result is random unless there is a mechanical cheat attached under the table to control where the ball will drop.  I think the casino thinks that the dealer is the lucky charm of the person, replacing the dealer will cancel out the luck..  lol what a superstition.

The losing streak might be a coincidence, since the guy is bound to lose his bet, after all, it is very rare to get a 100% win in a roulette session.

[Wakate]

Crazy run by this gamblers, but sooner or later casinos will have to stop them. Their method? Change the dealer to disrupt everything, you can hear it that the gamblers wanted that dealer back but they say that he will just take a break.

And obviously the new dealer will have different throws and so they stop this gamblers from continuing their winning streak.



This is roulette by the way, I have this kind of experience, not that I'm winning big, but I have played before wherein me and my buddies are in a streak then suddenly they've change the lady dealer and so after that, we lost after one spin with the new dealer and I told them that we better stop and take the profits and that's what we did.

I don't know why the casino chooses to stop the gamblers from having a winning streaks but this is to protect their business against illegals kind of playing that can be very difficult to know. Casinos are always looking for way for them to stay profitable since it is a kind of business that is established to make money. If the casino chooses to leave these gamblers to continue winning, it might be hard for them to pay for other players winnings.

[Nwada001]

Changing the dealer only affects the player's mindset, not the game outcome. Even with a new dealer, the results stayed the same which proves the odds don't really change. Sure, it might just be a normal shift schedule, but casinos know the mental effect it has on players. After all, roulette is purely random so a new dealer shouldn't change the odds at all.

That player's mindset is exactly what the casino really wants to be toiling with; once they see you're on a winning streak, they want to distract your mind by making you think the dealer has an influence on what's making you win, and when you see the dealer changed, either your confidence level will have to reduce, or sometimes you have to forget that the odds are not controlled by anyone, and fear will be accommodated in you, and coincidentally, if the next round doesn't play as a win for you, that fear remains in you for that particular game until you leave the table.

[xbetz.io]

I’ve seen this happen many times in live casinos as well, where the dealer gets replaced during a session. But in most cases it’s probably just normal rotation rather than something intended to change the outcome. In games like roulette every spin should be independent, so changing the dealer shouldn’t really affect the probabilities. What usually happens is that players are on a streak and when the pattern breaks it feels like something changed in the system. That said, it’s always interesting to hear real experiences from players who were actually at the table.

[ZeroVinsonN]

Maybe the dealer actually does need a break, we seem to forget that there people are human beings too and when a person gets tired they need to rest, rotating workers didn't start today so you can't exactly say they changed your dealer because you were winning too much unless you had some kind of an arrangement with the dealer if not it's still a game of chance and you will still win if you are in luck, if you lost after the dealer change then you'd have most likely still lost that round even with your previous dealer.

Based on the situation in the post, it's likely that the casino has an internal algorithm that involves replacing the dealer when the player has a winning streak, preventing possible collusion between the player and the dealer. The player will obviously be nervous when the replacement occurs, so it's possible this is a tactic or a psychological trick. I don't quite understand how this could work against an experienced player, but it's still possible.

It is a business strategy after all, no one wants to lose money and if your playing with a particular dealer means that you will win more and the casino will lose then the best thing they can do for themselves is to take that advantage away from you and the sweet part is that they can do it very legally by just say that they are shifting their staffs and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
But with roulette I don't see how that could have been the case, it's not a very easy game to manipulate.

[mcdouglasx]

I don't know why people are so superstitious about gambling; it borders on the absurd. Whatever they do, it's pure probability that influences the game, not the dealer. Perhaps they themselves were negatively influenced and saw the loss as a bad omen. I suppose the casino doesn't change the dealer because of some kind of superstition, but to prevent its employees from colluding with players to cheat.

[Hyphen(-)]

Changing the dealer only affects the player's mindset, not the game outcome. Even with a new dealer, the results stayed the same which proves the odds don't really change. Sure, it might just be a normal shift schedule, but casinos know the mental effect it has on players. After all, roulette is purely random so a new dealer shouldn't change the odds at all.

Exactly, I think it is a mind game by the casino owners to distract the players so that they can be afraid and start losing since they think that the casino is losing big money as a result of the winning streak of the players that’s why they changed the dealer so as to disrupt the winning, and since the OP’s mindset is there and they lose which means the casino platforms planned well and they got it right.

However, having long term winning streak doesn’t stop losing money to gambling, it is something one can ever predict, and that’s why risk management is important especially if you are not confident on yourself.

[Agbamoni]

I will agree with you a little because changing the dealer do not really change the outcome, you see because games like roulette it's all about luck and when you pick randomly or randomness. And again the casinos still know if they change the dealer it will eventually resets the mind of players, so about the effects is all psychological than anything that concerns the original or real odds

We ought to respect the physiological nature of gambling. A particular dealer spin may favor one gambler over the other, not because the dealer altered the spin but because the gambler finds luck when that particular dealer throws the seed on the wheel. If the gambler believes his lucks rest on that dealer, that's his own cross to carry, and since it has been working for him that way, there is nothing wrong.

[TopTort777]

Replace dealer, that is useful tactics. Distract player from concentration, make pause to confuse player. Everything is useful. I dont know if that is true, but I have read that when gambler was winning to much, casino representative came, told that table is closed and that gamblers visit is over for now. When gambler withdrew money, he was told that casino "close doors for him and he should visit other casinos nearby". It was a story about casino in Vegas.

[Oluwa-btc]

Crazy run by this gamblers, but sooner or later casinos will have to stop them. Their method? Change the dealer to disrupt everything, you can hear it that the gamblers wanted that dealer back but they say that he will just take a break.

Casinos owners are always more steps ahead of the gamblers cause regardless they won't have themselves loosing to the gamblers. In most cases they'll want to influence the outcome of the game to suit their demands and needs, but for this particular roulette games in the casino I think the replacement wasn't really to be in favour of anyone cause basically the game itself it's so unpredictable and it's influenced by luck .

[Miles2006]

This sounds strange, changing the dealer and suddenly the game turned really bad for players. Casinos who get involve changing dealers clearly have a reason best know to them either to switch odds and opportunity depending on how carried away the gambler get so in such situation they don’t observe early.
I have not experienced this probably I hardly stay consistent to an extend creating a streak, casinos doing such are not helping gamblers win genuinely according to op point it’s clear the act of changing dealers are done intentionally for a reason.

[Onyeeze]

Every business has its own strategy, and replacing one dealer with another is not necessarily a specially planned action for a particular situation. It could be a previously prepared scenario for such cases, or simply part of the work schedule, after all, people need breaks and clearly defined working hours.All people need time to sit down, rest, have a drink or a meal, and go to the toilet. So yes, it does happen that a dealer who seemed lucky can be replaced by another one.

You're right from your expressions but I refute the particular statement of replacing a dealer is not necessary, any business have ethics and if you dont follow the ethics of the business you may lose everything, so I'm suggesting that if your dealer in a business is not giving you what you want in business you have to place the dealer because delaying to replace might caused you harm if its not handled with proper care,

[Shinpako09]

We call it “balasa” in our country. In our local perya, when the house is losing, they change the balls or staff and vice versa, bettors can also request the staff to use new balls if the house is winning continuously. The house in this topic obviously did the same to disrupt the players’ momentum. I don’t think it’s illegal or violates any law or rules, so it’s fine. It’s not cheating either, so we can’t really call it that. Maybe that’s already a sign to call it a day.

[Itz-prisigold]

I don't know why people are so superstitious about gambling; it borders on the absurd. Whatever they do, it's pure probability that influences the game, not the dealer. Perhaps they themselves were negatively influenced and saw the loss as a bad omen. I suppose the casino doesn't change the dealer because of some kind of superstition, but to prevent its employees from colluding with players to cheat.

People tend to say winning is a matter of luck when in terms of gambling,  winning is about staying focused, calm, and paying attention so that winning and losing streaks don't mess with your flow at the table. But the moment something takes that your focus or attention just like changing the dealer,  it will just throw you off completely. That has nothing to do with magic or superstition,  it is just that your vibe is broken.

One spin with a new dealer and suddenly you starts to overthink, you start losing confidence and making small mistakes.  It's just funny how a small change like that made you to lose all your focus. So I guess winning is not just about probability,  no matter the situation you should always keep your your head on the game and stay focus.  And most times the best thing to do is to just take your winnings and step away  before you start losing everything.

[Hypnosis00]

Winning 5 bets straight is unusual. They made a move and tried to change the momentum. Of course, casinos don't tell anyone why they change the dealer, but it is already in our minds why. But should we complain about it? I think no. They have their own way of dealing with players, and we never know if there is manipulation.

Honestly, casinos don't want any gambler to walk out of their door with money. Instead, they want to see you go home empty. That is why every win we have makes them think of something (cheating), not luck.

[aioc]

.. and I told them that we better stop and take the profits and that's what we did.

I would have done the same; they just stopped your momentum and took you out of the game. Casinos are profit-driven companies. When they see one gambler is winning, they will do something to throw off your game and even ban you if you keep betting them, so the wise decision is to stop and take out your winnings.

There is such a thing as a winning flow; it's like, whatever you do, you hit it right. It's rare, and you are lucky if this happens in one of your sessions. Getting interrupted is not good.

[Cantsay]

I’m still trying to figure out the dealers role in his winnings, the only time I’d think of it as shady was if roulette was a game where the dealer can truly affect whether you’ll win or lose that’s when casinos should be called for it. But since changing of shifts is just as normal as every day duty I don’t see why they should be called out for.

[Yaunfitda]

I’m still trying to figure out the dealers role in his winnings, the only time I’d think of it as shady was if roulette was a game where the dealer can truly affect whether you’ll win or lose that’s when casinos should be called for it. But since changing of shifts is just as normal as every day duty I don’t see why they should be called out for.

The dealer has nothing to do with the winnings, maybe those gamblers is lucky enough to bet on the numbers that the dealer spin in 5 consecutive times. Roulette is random, unless there is something funny that the casino can control the outcome as this is what we thought when we lose. But if we look closely, they are just lucky and it's only coincidence because if you look at the odds, 1/37=≈ 2.70%. So that is the slim chance for them to win and yet they hit it 5x, so the odds are shocking. And since they are winning against the casino, then they will have to do everything in their power to disrupt this sort of success by the gamblers by changing the dealer. There's nothing unusual about it, not the first time that I have seen it, they want to stop the bleeding. As for the dealer, I don't think that his job is affected and he could still be rolling in roulette table by now.

[junder]

Does this happen to be just a coincidence or was the dealer of the casino actually influencing the outcome of the session?
I completely get why those gamblers would have liked to continue to have the same dealer, because they assume the dealer themselves was their "charm".

It is actually kind of silly as well how the casino played into these superstitions and opted to change the dealer.

I wonder if those dealers ended up being fired for allegedly manipulating the game in favor of gamblers...

I think the same thing, whether it was a coincidence or the dealer influenced the outcome of the game, but in my opinion, if this happens to many players, then maybe the dealer did influence the outcome of the game.

But if that's what the casino does to keep them profitable, I think the dealer will be safe, but if the dealer cheats outside of the casino rules, they could be fired.