How do i prove that i am human?

[seoincorporation]

First of all I want to apologise LoyceV, memehunter, and all the BitcoinTalk community. I will never abuse like the way i did.

Since my past behavior with AI on the forum, I took a break to understand how the world is using AI to make their lives easier.  And I learned a lot in the past months, and I believe it's time to come back to share some knowledge with this lovely community.

I undestand the fact that BitcoinTalk isn't against AI, the forum is against the abuse. If we let the AI write our post then we will be Nucked, but we can always get good ideas from AI and write a post with our own words and style, and that will be fine because the post wasn't just a copy paste. Even some promotional Threads are fully made with AI looking for the best design.

My goal with the comunnity now is to help other users in the forum, and share some cool and crazy threads as the way i used to do in the past.

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

[Mia Chloe]

~snip

At first I thought this message was coming from satofan44 lol... Then I thought nahh it can't be and damn I was correct thank goodness. Well I just saw the tags on your profile and all I can say is do you really think an apology will fix it? Just go on with the forum a new leaf my 2 cents though.

Anyways I think this topic best fits in the reputation board you should move it there you can leave a link here just for visibility though.

[BitBakerr1]

It is a good thing that you have come to understand your error, and I love people that acknowledge their mistakes, I believe you have learnt your lesson and you want to do everything possible to prove yourself to the community, the thing is that the community will watch you for some time to see if you have really changed.
The only way to find out if you are a human is to watch you for some time meaning it will take a long time, so keep contributing in the forum, the reason they are doubting, if truly you’re a human is because of the constant use of AI.
Meanwhile move this thread to reputation board it belongs there thanks.

[hugeblack]

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

Let your posts prove it. I don't think campaign managers focus on neutral trust if your posts are of high quality, that's all you need to do.
Trust is something that is earned, so don't expect one topic and a few apologies to change it.

[Zwei]

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

[seoincorporation]

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

lol, that's a good one...



And i agree with BitBakerr1 and hugeblack, time will talk and prove my good intentions.

[memehunter]

I will never abuse like the way i did.

My goal with the comunnity now is to help other users in the forum, and share some cool and crazy threads as the way i used to do in the past.

Well if you think removing my neutral will help you to make your contribution here, so be it. You have invested so many years here and I would have removed my neutral quite a while ago if you would have posted regularly. Usually for lower ranks I have a personal policy of making 100-200 quality posts but considering your seniority, I think it is a fair stance.  

[Cryptoprincess101]

I undestand the fact that BitcoinTalk isn't against AI, the forum is against the abuse. If we let the AI write our post then we will be Nucked,

Hope you are aware of this. AI guidelines

but we can always get good ideas from AI and write a post with our own words and style, and that will be fine because the post wasn't just a copy paste. Even some promotional Threads are fully made with AI looking for the best design.

Modifying AI contents can still indicate that your texts are written by an AI, hope you know about AI humanizers so you should be very careful on how you translate AI contents to your own words. Your words don't need to be perfect so far as you are passing the right information to people. Besides, we are all learning, no one is an ''island of knowledge'' so if there is a mistake, there are people who can call your attention for a correction.

[Zwei]

...

lol, that's a good one...

i couldn't resist, lol.

i guess you are not human since you failed it 



the fun stuff aside, all i'm going to say, what you did was pretty stupid. someone who been on the forum for so long should have known better.
but we all make mistakes, so i see nothing wrong with the community giving you a second chance. some will agree, some won't, but as long as you prove yourself and don't do stupid shit like that again, you should be good.

[GeorgeJohn]

I will never abuse like the way i did

It's good that you have realised your mistakes

Since my past behavior with AI on the forum, I took a break to understand how the world is using AI to make their lives easier.  And I learned a lot in the past months, and I believe it's time to come back to share some knowledge with this lovely community.

i don't know the benefits you gain in using Al, as you said that you will not use AI again, i hope you maintain it and do what forum wants...some of us know what is obtainable and fail to do them

[PrivacyG]

It is hard to sort out your Reputation after doing something bad but considering you were not Scamming or doing any thing as bad or worse, I find it hard to believe you can not come back and repair your mistake.  It will take time and effort but you should be able to prove your self again.

Although Signature Campaign spamming is arguably a type of Scamming too.  Particularly if it was done by publishing batches of absolutely zero effort text.  At least the non Artificial Intelligence spam had the effort of typing B S on a keyboard.

Anyway.  I doubt your tags will be gone or that you will ever be seen as you were before doing this.  But act normal, put a little bit of effort in making things better for your self and most people will accept you back with out a doubt.

[notocactus]

First of all I want to apologise LoyceV, memehunter, and all the BitcoinTalk community. I will never abuse like the way i did.

My goal with the comunnity now is to help other users in the forum, and share some cool and crazy threads as the way i used to do in the past.

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

You made mistakes that were detected and reported by community, then handled by forum moderators but by posting this thread, your mistakes were not enough to result in an account ban (I don't know whether you got a temporary ban). That's good, and you don't have to pass any human test, why do you need that?

Learn from your mistakes, don't repeat it, and become a helpful member in the forum, it's not a human test but it's how you show that you as a person are helpful for Bitcointalk community. It means more than any human test that people can pass through very well while after that they return to previous habit.

About human test, it reminds me about this funny one.

• [EXPERIMENT] Testing the Limits of Shitposting.

[yahoo62278]

I have worked with you on a couple projects and talked with you many times, I was a bit disappointed to see you doing the AI crap. It's not hard to have an opinion and really no need to have AI post or think for you on a forum.

With that being said, you'll have some eyes on you for a bit but nothing you can't handle. Hopefully you learn from your mistake.

[LoyceV]

Since my past behavior with AI on the forum, I took a break to understand how the world is using AI to make their lives easier.

Are you sure you didn't take a "break" because you weren't in a signature campaign anymore? You've barely made any posts since you got caught 9 months ago!

My goal with the comunnity now is to help other users in the forum, and share some cool and crazy threads as the way i used to do in the past.

You could have done that without creating this topic.

Well if you think removing my neutral will help you to make your contribution here, so be it. You have invested so many years here and I would have removed my neutral quite a while ago if you would have posted regularly. Usually for lower ranks I have a personal policy of making 100-200 quality posts but considering your seniority, I think it is a fair stance.

So someone who should have known better gets a pass after being absent instead of posting "quality posts"?
To quote myself:

From now, seoincorporation isn't a part of the campaign until he can be able to remove the neutral tag from his profile.

I see no reason to remove it, as long as it's valid. I kinda want this to be remembered.

I'm all for giving more established users a second chance when it comes to this kind of thing, especially if they swear they're not gonna do it again, which is why I didn't leave a tag.

On the one hand I agree, but on the other hand I don't like to give "special treatment" after I gave many low-ranking chatbot spammers a neutral tag. Especially established members should know better.

@OP: here's a challenge for you: how about you report 42 chatbot verbal diarrhae spammers and get them banned? And not just newbies, that's easy. Find and report the Member+ Ranks who do this. It will give you some understanding of the effort put into cleaning the spam from Bitcointalk.
If you can list 42 "AI" spammers that you got banned, I'll add another neutral tag saying you made amends in my opinion

but we all make mistakes, so i see nothing wrong with the community giving you a second chance.

A second chance to what? OP wasn't banned, and nobody is stopping him from posting here.

[NotATether]

And that's why I'm ready to take a human test, ask me anything.

You beat me to posting this!

Here, try this one (90% of people fail)

[Free Market Capitalist]

The question in the title is completely misleading. You don't have to prove you're human because you weren't given neutral tags for being a bot. You were given them for using AI-generated text and posting it as if it were your own creation. These are two clearly different things.

[memehunter]

So someone who should have known better gets a pass after being absent instead of posting "quality posts"?
To quote myself:

You sense of judgement is much more robust than me. I was not even comfortable having your and my name in the same apology post. I did what my sense of judgement told me and I am sure you will do as per yours, as you usually do. In my limited understanding, It is not like penalty has not been given. He has been removed from Signature campaigns and all.

@OP: here's a challenge for you: how about you report (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg65467361#msg65467361) 42 chatbot verbal diarrhae spammers and get them banned?

OP should take this challenge and should devote some months to this task. 

[The Cryptovator]

Good thing you realised how to use AI on the forum. I have learnt a lesson as well. Before, I had used AI to make proper grammar, but it does change some words as well, which leads to AI detection. Then I realised to avoid using AI for making corrections and now use QuillBot or Grammarly to make corrections. These tools don't change anything but fix your grammar and spelling mistakes.

Sometimes I use AI to get current data from the internet or some information. But never use it to write posts or don't use the command for grammar correction. AI would be helpful if we can use it the right way; misuse would lead to a ban on our account. Because nowadays it's pretty easy to detect AI articles. Hope you will contribute to the forum again.

[MarryWithBTC]

Here, try this one (90% of people fail)

I want to check if I am among the genius 10%.

I was tempted to tick two more boxes by the right, but I resisted the temptation.

Op, I read your AI experiments. Trust this is not another experiment lol. Please stop the experiments because theymos made AI guidelines already

[examplens]

I undestand the fact that BitcoinTalk isn't against AI, the forum is against the abuse. If we let the AI write our post then we will be Nucked, but we can always get good ideas from AI and write a post with our own words and style, and that will be fine because the post wasn't just a copy paste.

I'm just curious how you (or any AI transcriber) came to the conclusion that others might find your transmission of an AI-generated point of view interesting. At the same time, keep in mind that all, but absolutely all, members of this forum have equal or perhaps even more advanced access to the same AI tools.
So, what kind of unique idea will AI give you, but not me or anyone else?
I'm pretty sure that most people come here to exchange opinions with real humans because we all have bot thinking at our fingertips.