Can staking power affect your winning rate?

[Mr_Brilliant$]

What is your take on this?

I think the pattern is to bet small for higher risk and bet bigger for lower risk. When you bet big, of course, you won't place bets on many matches on a single slip. But those who have small bets, hoping to get a good return, could achieve 10x or 20x, which increases the risk. This is also related to the choice of accumulating odds.

That is just it, most times when i stack with small money, I do go for big odd and many matches, with the hope of getting something tangible off it. But I don’t go after many odds when staking with big or moderate amount.. It’s just a simple logic, the more games you add, the more chances you give one match to spoil everything.

Even if all the games look easy, it’s football, it can always surprise you..  One random little thing and the whole game slip is gone..  That is why it seem like low stackers kidda have lower win rate.

[Anayochukwu]

From my gambling experience, it seems high stakers tends to win more bet than gamblers with low staking power, my reason is that, high stakers tends to make few selections with high probability of the selected teams to win. It is not as if people who stake very high does not loose their bets, but they tend to win more than the low
stakers.
People with low staking power make plenty selections, and sometimes because of the plenty selections, they even doubt some of their selections , and they depend on the number of selected games to boost their reward. In the case of high stakers, a single bet can give them good reward because of the staking power.

What is your take on this?

Don't allow this mindset to make go extra mile in gambling because as far as I know gambling still depends on luck, so no side is the best in gambling because had it been is possible like that those gamblers that is taking loan because of sure odds would have been a billionaire by now. But they still end up losing their bets, while some gamblers that are only gambling with small amount are getting lucky with their bets so being a high staker doesn't guarantee you winnings in gambling because it is a luck base game that nothing is satting.

[AmaGold70]

From my gambling experience, it seems high stakers tends to win more bet than gamblers with low staking power, my reason is that, high stakers tends to make few selections with high probability of the selected teams to win. It is not as if people who stake very high does not loose their bets, but they tend to win more than the low
stakers.
People with low staking power make plenty selections, and sometimes because of the plenty selections, they even doubt some of their selections , and they depend on the number of selected games to boost their reward. In the case of high stakers, a single bet can give them good reward because of the staking power.

What is your take on this?

Yes, I agree with you that staking power has major role to play in gambling. I understand that even big stakers loose money just like small stakers loose too, but there is one thing that is very interesting about staking big, staking big enables you to reduce risk of loosing your bet to a reasonable extent. While small stakers are bent on making plenty selections and plenty of odds to boost their wins with little stake, big stakers bet on very few games and well researched games before placing their bet. And from statistics, these big stakers make more wins than the small stakers. Think of when a small stakers will use just $100 to target $10000, this is absolutely an expectation that barely come through and this is about 1000 odds, and a big staker can use even $5000 to win thesame $10000. Yes, the big staker only need just 2 odds to win thesame amount of money and is very much possible to win $10000 over and over again while the small staker can even gamble even for seasons without achieving his target.