Can staking power affect your winning rate?

[Johnlomape]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

[danherbias07]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before.

Be it high or low stakers, it is very important to know that the gambling sites are their to do things that will let you lose money for them to make more money. Not manipulation, but how it is designed.

I also believe that it is about the percentage. The lost money and the wagered amount are all calculated, and somehow, the program will tell how much it will give back. There are instances where it would give large amounts, but it's very rare for it to happen. This is only for the casino and slot games. I don't believe it applies to sports betting.
What I don't believe is the RNG. If that is true, then why the heck are we receiving a long winning streak after a big win? I mean, if the RNG is real, then there should still be a chance to win the same in a short period of time. But I have not seen that happen in my long time of playing slots and casino games.

[Cointxz]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

OP topic pertains to the advantage of having huge stake which he assumed has high winning percentage which is nonsense since bet size doesn’t increase winning chance rate and it doesn’t affect the game result.

When it comes to sheer profit amount. It’s obvious that huge staker has higher profit than small staker due to the difference on the bet amount. Assuming we will just a consider a single profitable session.

We all know that no one can win on gambling in long term. The only advantage of small staker is the6 have smaller losses in the long run compared to huge staker but they never be better in terms of profit assuming we will use the same gambler outcome in terms of their W/L game history and apply the bankroll and bet percentage respectively.

[Frankolala]

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

Winning your bet doesn't rely on how much that was used to Stake on the game so, let's not get it twisted to avoid passing wrong information that can mislead new gamblers. Luck is what will determine the outcome of your bet and not by the amount. I prefer to be a low stake who only bet on one or two games and not on a long parlay because I want to make profits. I can only afford to lose little amount of money because that's what I can afford. Limiting your losses is the best.

[rachael9385]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

Good point, high stakes don't increase chances of winning, in the long run you are only going to expose yourself to the dangers of gambling when you start losing huge amounts. Gambling is a game of luck, you can either win or lose, that alone should be a constant reminder to always stake an amount of money that you can lose comfortably with.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

We can win with small bets, and conversely, we can lose with large bets as well. Since no one can predict luck, anything can happen as long as it makes sense.

Sometimes I even get more lucky to win my bets if the amount I'm staking with is small and I feel that that normally happens to influence my decision towards increasing my wagering amount, if I obliged to that temptation, I will end up losing the bet because I increased the amount. Staking power does not affect winning rate, everything is just luck and the house always have more edge.

[Yablee0]

This is the first I have heard that high stakes betting is easier to win more consistently than that of low stakes betting, is that really a thing?

Yes it's very possible or maybe you haven't experienced it before. Higher staking power is more effective and it likely create a higher chance of winning than little staking power even though winning isn't guaranteed, let me explain: from my experience, l usually pick some few odds put something huge in it and if am lucky enough for the day I'll take some meaningful home, unlike staking with a little fund's that you have to start marking a whole of games just to amount to something tangible and you know how it's very difficult winning a very long slip, it's almost an impossible task.

Furthermore, I know gamble is a game of luck, meaning no matter how hard you try to influence the results in your favour either by staking big or small funds, luck has the final fate of the game regardless.

[swogerino]

We can win with small bets, and conversely, we can lose with large bets as well. Since no one can predict luck, anything can happen as long as it makes sense.

Sometimes I even get more lucky to win my bets if the amount I'm staking with is small and I feel that that normally happens to influence my decision towards increasing my wagering amount, if I obliged to that temptation, I will end up losing the bet because I increased the amount. Staking power does not affect winning rate, everything is just luck and the house always have more edge.

Most of providers are now well aware of the fact that before they used to give more precedence and wins to minimum bet players and it doesn't look like this is active anymore because even with minimum bet I am being crushed out. Nevertheless though the higher the stake the higher the win but this will happen extremely on few cases and that ocurrence is going to be extra rare. What is going to be so common and happening most of the time is that as soon as you increase your bet you will receive the fastest way to lose all of your balance.

[Queen uloma]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

High staking doesn’t guarantee big profit. It can give you big win but the risk is very high. The more you’re winning big, the more you’re also losing, which can result to financial problem. Gambling isn’t something that someone is suppose to put all his money into, whether you stake small or big, you will surely lose. That’s why it’s advisable to only use money that you can afford to lose, so it won’t affect your life or put you into problem.
The main thing isn’t how much you stake but how well you can control yourself and manage your money.  

[Mindyspace]

...

Yes it's very possible or maybe you haven't experienced it before. Higher staking power is more effective and it likely create a higher chance of winning than little staking power even though winning isn't guaranteed, let me explain: from my experience, l usually pick some few odds put something huge in it and if am lucky enough for the day I'll take some meaningful home, unlike staking with a little fund's that you have to start marking a whole of games just to amount to something tangible and you know how it's very difficult winning a very long slip, it's almost an impossible task.

Furthermore, I know gamble is a game of luck, meaning no matter how hard you try to influence the results in your favour either by staking big or small funds, luck has the final fate of the game regardless.

I understand your point, but betting higher doesn't increase your chances of winning, it only increases the amount you win or lose. The probability remains the same, regardless of the bet amount. This feeling that betting higher works better comes more from when it works and the winnings are large, then it sticks more.

And about winning streaks, it's really difficult to maintain several consecutive wins, but that doesn't change when you bet high on a single play; the risk is just more concentrated in a single moment.

In this case, as you yourself said, it's all luck, so the amount doesn't matter and the result doesn't change because of it, only the impact on your wallet, you know?

[icebar]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

High staking doesn’t guarantee big profit. It can give you big win but the risk is very high. The more you’re winning big, the more you’re also losing, which can result to financial problem. Gambling isn’t something that someone is suppose to put all his money into, whether you stake small or big, you will surely lose. That’s why it’s advisable to only use money that you can afford to lose, so it won’t affect your life or put you into problem.
The main thing isn’t how much you stake but how well you can control yourself and manage your money.  

In my opinion, those who bet more will benefit more than those who bet less, because betting more puts more pressure on the gambler. Moreover, if you bet more, you will have to do more research and the chances of making mistakes will increase. Although some people also believe that betting more is less risky, on the other hand, using more money in a few bets is riskier. In my opinion, it is better to bet less and increase your money than to bet more. You have to take risks when betting. There is no way to avoid risk when betting.

[junder]

Sometimes I even get more lucky to win my bets if the amount I'm staking with is small and I feel that that normally happens to influence my decision towards increasing my wagering amount, if I obliged to that temptation, I will end up losing the bet because I increased the amount. Staking power does not affect winning rate, everything is just luck and the house always have more edge.

That's what you experienced, I was like that too but now I'm not like that anymore, for now I do it with big bets but on the other hand I'm ready to lose too.

What I think is that when I get lucky by using a big bet then the amount of winnings will also be large and I have experienced it several times, but the other side is that it makes the bet end quickly too.

[Sticky Bomb]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

When we discuss these things, we reference long-term and not just the moment. A high staker has more possibility of loosing irrecoverable funds on the long-run than a low staker, a low staker has more chances to try his luck since he stakes low, which means his capital is not depleted easily and he can gamble for longer, but a high staker has the discipline of going hard or going home and most of them loose a lot in a twinkle of an eye. Most people who uses martingale strategy are high stakers and in a bid to recover losses, they loose more, so on the long-term, most low stakers have better winning rate than high stakers and they enjoy gambling as well more than the high stakers.

[Derekfunds]

This is not true at all. I have seen people that make money when they are using little amount of money to bet, but they increase the money and start to lose. I have even experienced it before..

I agree that the OP assumption is not true about highly stakers having the lot in profit making than lower stakers. It's just about luck for both sides as you can be in a streak win and make profit regardless on what amount you be staking with.

Also happens that what makes some gamblers lose back to the house all they have won in profit is because they get greedy while in a winning streaks by doubling or tripling their stake and it all happens that they loss all at once.

If you are a high staker gambler, you will make huge profits from betting when others are making little profits from their bets.
If you are high staker, when other are losing small amounts of money due to what they used to stake the bet, you will lose big because you used big amount to stake the bet. It does not only affect small stakers alone but the big ones are involved also.
It is better you take the risk you know you are ready to let go so that you don't lose all your money at once due to the way you are gambling.

When we discuss these things, we reference long-term and not just the moment. A high staker has more possibility of loosing irrecoverable funds on the long-run than a low staker, a low staker has more chances to try his luck since he stakes low, which means his capital is not depleted easily and he can gamble for longer, but a high staker has the discipline of going hard or going home and most of them loose a lot in a twinkle of an eye. Most people who uses martingale strategy are high stakers and in a bid to recover losses, they loose more, so on the long-term, most low stakers have better winning rate than high stakers and they enjoy gambling as well more than the high stakers.

This is not totally true, but yea a high staker may lose more in long term than low staker because of the difference in stake but that doesn't mean a low staker will have a higher winning rate than a high staker because I don't believe that, reason because when you have the money to stake, a wise gambler or person won't target for high odds they go for low odds even though nothing is guarantee but at least the risk will be minimize or reduce unlike low staker who will make a lot of parley to boost their potential win, some low staker don't even win it depends though

[Humblevirus]

From my gambling experience, it seems high stakers tends to win more bet than gamblers with low staking power, my reason is that, high stakers tends to make few selections with high probability of the selected teams to win. It is not as if people who stake very high does not loose their bets, but they tend to win more than the low
stakers.
People with low staking power make plenty selections, and sometimes because of the plenty selections, they even doubt some of their selections , and they depend on the number of selected games to boost their reward. In the case of high stakers, a single bet can give them good reward because of the staking power.

What is your take on this?

Many people say that when someone stakes a big amount and selects only a few games, they are more likely to win than those who stake small amounts of money and select many games just to get higher odds, but often end up losing.However, the truth is that it is all about luck. It may happen that the one game selected by someone who staked a big amount is the only game that gets messed up on that particular day or time.So, since there is no assurance that any game will happen as we predict, we should understand that both someone who selects many games and someone who selects only a few have the same chances of winning, because gambling is all about luck.

As for me, I have tried staking with high amounts and small odds, and also with small amounts and high odds, and my experience has been really bad. Before I tried staking big amounts on a few games, I used to think I would win if I did that, but that is not true. In fact, I have even won more times by staking small amounts than by using big amounts on small odds.

[Agbe]

Sometimes I even get more lucky to win my bets if the amount I'm staking with is small and I feel that that normally happens to influence my decision towards increasing my wagering amount, if I obliged to that temptation, I will end up losing the bet because I increased the amount. Staking power does not affect winning rate, everything is just luck and the house always have more edge.

That's what you experienced, I was like that too but now I'm not like that anymore, for now I do it with big bets but on the other hand I'm ready to lose too.

What I think is that when I get lucky by using a big bet then the amount of winnings will also be large and I have experienced it several times, but the other side is that it makes the bet end quickly too.

That is why gambling is a risk taking. Someone create a thread and was saying if casinos knows our mind. Well, it is a psychological analysis. As it was said, casinos are for business and they know that if the gambler use small amount to play gamble and wins, he would like to use big amount to gamble so he can win big. Stake small to win small and stake big to win big.

[TheUltraElite]

High stakes also mean high losses and high wins. The losses will be enough to cover the wins in the long term and hence they will rarely have a profit. There is nothing good in the winning rate, you also have to see the profit overall - just winning a 1.01x bet multiple times over an hour does not mean anything good.

Always see it from the perspective of the casino. To them a high roller means high profits as well. As soon as they lose, the high roller has hit one Achilles heel. Now they will find it difficult to come back up again. Next loss will be devastating for them, they will likely be wiped out - even after knowing this they will still be trying to win it back and lose quite naturally.

[YellowSwap]

From my gambling experience, it seems high stakers tends to win more bet than gamblers with low staking power, my reason is that, high stakers tends to make few selections with high probability of the selected teams to win. It is not as if people who stake very high does not loose their bets, but they tend to win more than the low
stakers.
People with low staking power make plenty selections, and sometimes because of the plenty selections, they even doubt some of their selections , and they depend on the number of selected games to boost their reward. In the case of high stakers, a single bet can give them good reward because of the staking power.

What is your take on this?

Not all of us.

I do go the lowest that I can because it's what I can afford to lose but that doesn't mean that I picked plenty games like some people and this doesn't even make me win most times.

I have placed bet on a single game and lose, carefully selected two games and I still lost the money.

I get your point, but even if you risk high amount of money and you have picked a lot of games you have a high probability of losing the money, higher stake and lower stakes means nothing when it comes to luck.

Those who do lower stakes understand the needful thing to do as a gambler, it's not that they can't also go big on their stakes.

[Wapfika]

When we discuss these things, we reference long-term and not just the moment. A high staker has more possibility of loosing irrecoverable funds on the long-run than a low staker, a low staker has more chances to try his luck since he stakes low, which means his capital is not depleted easily and he can gamble for longer, but a high staker has the discipline of going hard or going home and most of them loose a lot in a twinkle of an eye. Most people who uses martingale strategy are high stakers and in a bid to recover losses, they loose more, so on the long-term, most low stakers have better winning rate than high stakers and they enjoy gambling as well more than the high stakers.

This is not totally true, but yea a high staker may lose more in long term than low staker because of the difference in stake but that doesn't mean a low staker will have a higher winning rate than a high staker because I don't believe that, reason because when you have the money to stake, a wise gambler or person won't target for high odds they go for low odds even though nothing is guarantee but at least the risk will be minimize or reduce unlike low staker who will make a lot of parley to boost their potential win, some low staker don't even win it depends though

He didn’t said low staker has a high winning rate rather more chance to try his luck because he just losing small amount which I don’t agree either. It’s always based on the bet percentage compared to the total bankroll is the key to make more bet counts.

A small staker can still have low try on his bet if his betting 1/10 while high staker bet 1/100 bet proportion.

It’s not always true that high staker usually have low chance to try their luck. It all depends on their bankroll management.

[YOSHIE]

What is your take on this?

My personal assessment and my experience in gambling and betting, for me, winning a bet does not lie in the strength of the bet, but the extent of the strength of the knowledge we have regarding the bet.

I can prove that from myself, yesterday I placed a consecutive winning score bet.
Proof:


I think this victory has no effect on the strength of the bet, it is my own analysis, statistics and predictions that achieve it all, in short my understanding of sports betting.
I think other people do too, it's not much different, many place high bets on the ending of the story falling.