The faults of the nation

[Accardo]

Responsibility to a good or bad government depends on both government and the people. The government is the people and the people are the government. A person from among the people become the leader over the people, and has the mandate to listen  to the people when ever they call for help, while the people should also work hand in hand with there leader to have a smooth and peaceful rule.
We complain when majority of what happened during the rule of a leader is caused by us, for example a leader with no goal and purpose for the people campaign and offering gifts. This kind of person will have more followers that someone that have a good agendee for the people, but maybe he doesn't have much funds to bribe people for them to vote for him.

Who makes up a nation? the people. Every other thing is a term or name. Government is a term, people are there, and act based on what they're being told. When people begin to think better or build a structure that encourages good conduct, the nation would be at peace and harmony, with every citizen enjoying all the resources generated from the nation.

[Obulis]

The masses have their own fair share of the blame but they can’t be considered the real faults of a nation’s problem, because by every logic, the ordinary man on the street is just trying hard to survive under a system imposed on them by the elite or politicians. If leaderships, institutions and policies that drive the development of a society is weak!, then it will definitely become very difficult for the masses to effect a change. But very key the I would hold every citizen responsible for is that people should have zero tolerance for corruption, bad governance and they should hold leaders accountable, because if they don’t , then those problems can continue for a long time.

Not that the bad leadership is does not impose bad governance on the masses but an important point to note is that most of this masses glad accepts these imposition by people they gave mandate and that explains all that falls that acceptance. That is to say that if they don't accept bad leadership, bad leadership will not overrule their willingness and readiness for a better leadership and governance.

[BADecker]

What is a State of the  USA? Isn't it a state of mind. It's written down because the people can't remember it accurately if it isn't.

The borders between two states exist where? Sometimes there are are land faults, or rivers. But these change over time. So people try to write down surveyed points that do not change over time, mountain to mountain that do not change for at least hundreds of years. And it is done by states agreeing with the surveys done by both of them.

Lot property lines are based on surveys that are done, and agreements of people with those surveys.


In other words, it is all based on words and agreements. If you are a man or woman, learn how to say it. And then make your statement and file it in the public records so that you have something to stand on when you are opposed.

[Abdulzuruku01]

Citizens have the responsibility to be good, to participate in society, and above all to make the right decisions in electing their leaders. If we want better lives, we should be prepared to live responsibly as well.

I agree with you because a better country don't depend on leaders only, the citizens in the country also has their roles to play. You see if the citizens of that country don't vote properly or don't care on what happens in the society then I think it will be very hard for Change to come. So I Will say that apart from conducting election or electing good leaders, the people too should try to do their own part in the society, they should speak up when something isn't right and also respect the laws , and lastly they should contribute little to the growth of the community and that's how the society becomes a better place or grows

When we are talking about the betterment of the community or nation at large, some people may think that it's only the responsibility of government to make the nation better, despite the fact that government plays a major role in the development of the country, but still, no nation got developed without the contributions of its citizens, otherwise, everything will keeps declining.

Citizens must contribute by being willing to learn new skills and ideas that can boost the economy of the nation. In addition, citizens should also promote local businesses and the building of companies, they are also volunteer in sanitation and social services, such as education and healthcare advocacy. In conclusion, if the citizens are bad, the community will be bad as well as good citizens always build their communities.

[Muba20]

What do you think is the actual fault of any nation under any bad conditions?
The conditions of some nations by conditioners are so bad that bad governance is almost already a standard. Whereas in some nations these bad conditions is not any where close to being a standard but momentary and deserve management, these are nations that enjoys all humanity oriented conditionings possible.

The government of a country and the people of that country have a lot of contribution to the overall condition of that country. The governments of some countries are very corrupt. They work only for personal interests without thinking about the country. If the ruling group is not good, then the people of that country will not be able to give much importance to the development of the country. In this regard the people are also responsible because if the people do not support to a worthy leader of a country, then the responsibility of that country does not go to such a dishonest person. Here, the people definitely have a responsibility that no one can avoid. Again, there are some leaders who try to bring the country under their complete control. If the common people oppose it, then they try to suppress them. The government and the people directly and indirectly contribute to both the development and deterioration of the nation.

[Floxynice]

When corruption is the order of the day in any society, everyone will suffer the consequences of a corrupt society. The funny thing is that everyone will keep pointing accusing fingers at the other person, forgetting the roles they have played individually in distorting growth and development in the society.

Many will easily say the leaders are the reason for the poor state of the nation, but then, every election period, the masses keep enabling these corrupt leaders to remain in office because they have had a share of the money gotten through corruption.

Corruption does not end in government offices alone; it is found in every home, marketplace, and in every interaction. Everyone is at fault. Until they change their mindset and way of life, bad leaders will continue to be at peace with themselves after embezzling public funds.

[Wakate]

Corruption has been the major reason why so many people are suffering when they have bad leaders that can embezzling the money that are meant for the development and to create job opportunities. It is not really easy to make money in a country where corruption is ruling.
If the government is doing almost it can to reduce the corruption in the society, this will make ghe people to be comfortable.

[kingstep]

If we think about this collectively. Almost everyone has a part on why a nation is failing. Leaders are not the only ones that should be proactively improving its community, but also the people under the community itself.

If the government is corrupt, chances are high that the people are even more corrupt and this is why even after there's a change in governance, nothing much really changes because you still have to bring in someone that's going to ruin the system even more.

If the people stand against the dictate of the government, the nation will improve but if the people sit back and act comfortable even when things are going wrong, the government will see it as applaud and will never act as at when due. A people that rises to the demand of her community will certainly leave to see a better community but a people that sit back and watch things go wrong without intervening will continue to blame the government will things continues to get worse.

[Joy- maker]

What do you think is the actual fault of any nation under any bad conditions?
The conditions of some nations by conditioners are so bad that bad governance is almost already a standard. Whereas in some nations these bad conditions is not any where close to being a standard but momentary and deserve management, these are nations that enjoys all humanity oriented conditionings possible.

Looking at some nationals that are in bad conditions and so are in need of humanity conditionings, can the masses actually create or influence the humanity conditionings that her citizenships really needs?

Is the masses the fault of the nation as in the reason behind bad conditionings (inhumanities)?
If not, how are they not the faults of their nation?
If they are, how do you think they're actually the faults of their nation?

Any county or Nation that is in bad condition it is partly the fault of the masses. Let's take Nigeria for example, Nigerians are the reason why bad governance is already become a standard in the country.

Nigerians may know that a particular person contesting for a position will not make a good leader, but because of tribalism, religion and what some persons intend to gain from the person's government they would go ahead and vote the person in which is very bad.

As the next presidential election is approaching in Nigeria despite all the terrible things the present government has done in the country many Nigerians are strongly supporting the government because of tribalism, religion and what they hope to gain from the government in its second term.

[Obulis]

Citizens have the responsibility to be good, to participate in society, and above all to make the right decisions in electing their leaders. If we want better lives, we should be prepared to live responsibly as well.

I agree with you because a better country don't depend on leaders only, the citizens in the country also has their roles to play. You see if the citizens of that country don't vote properly or don't care on what happens in the society then I think it will be very hard for Change to come. So I Will say that apart from conducting election or electing good leaders, the people too should try to do their own part in the society, they should speak up when something isn't right and also respect the laws , and lastly they should contribute little to the growth of the community and that's how the society becomes a better place or grows

When we are talking about the betterment of the community or nation at large, some people may think that it's only the responsibility of government to make the nation better, despite the fact that government plays a major role in the development of the country, but still, no nation got developed without the contributions of its citizens, otherwise, everything will keeps declining.

Citizens must contribute by being willing to learn new skills and ideas that can boost the economy of the nation. In addition, citizens should also promote local businesses and the building of companies, they are also volunteer in sanitation and social services, such as education and healthcare advocacy. In conclusion, if the citizens are bad, the community will be bad as well as good citizens always build their communities.

The learning of skill by the citizens is another serious thing but this citizens are responsible for not selling their mandate to group of people by legalizing looting in different ways through accepting to be bribed and othe measures publicly and privately. When the citizens sell their mandate the learned skill will be as good as nothing because the environment for this skills to thrive will be hazardously hijacked by greedy so-called leaders who has now bought or paid for the mandate that was given by the citizens.

[juttsab@]

What do you think is the actual fault of any nation under any bad conditions?
The conditions of some nations by conditioners are so bad that bad governance is almost already a standard. Whereas in some nations these bad conditions is not any where close to being a standard but momentary and deserve management, these are nations that enjoys all humanity oriented conditionings possible.

Looking at some nationals that are in bad conditions and so are in need of humanity conditionings, can the masses actually create or influence the humanity conditionings that her citizenships really needs?

Is the masses the fault of the nation as in the reason behind bad conditionings (inhumanities)?
If not, how are they not the faults of their nation?
If they are, how do you think they're actually the faults of their nation?

There are multiple reasons for the fault of the nation,  in multiple cases the responsibility lies with the leadership and institutions,  government makes policies and laws and they make and distribute the resources equally , when the leader are not performing their duties , they are corrupt or dishonest and disconnected from the people then these poor conditions become wider and wider and for the long period of time if these condition prevail then people take it as normal, citizen help to shape a nation through the choices by how they support and who they want to make their leaders accountable.
 According to my point of view the faults of the nation are, poor leadership, corruption ,weak institutions ,unemployment ,poverty ,poor education system, injustice and inequality ,lack of accountability, citizens negligence ,economic management, religious division , and many other, so in short the faults of a nation come from both leadership failure and from weak public.

[Gozie51]

Is the masses the fault of the nation as in the reason behind bad conditionings (inhumanities)?
If not, how are they not the faults of their nation?
If they are, how do you think they're actually the faults of their nation?

The masses are not the fault of their nation neither are they the reason for the way their government has gone bad. They are not the government or those in high places or parliament nor those who formulate policies or make laws. Policy making is what either better a nation or put it in bad shape. In policy, there is also penalty for offenders. What the question is, is what happens to offenders of laws and most culprits to laws are policy makers who see theirselves as bigger than the law.

Although, some masses are accomplice to the bad leadership in rigging elections for the politicians but they are few. The solution for the change is to have a peaceful revolution if possible.

Responsibility to a good or bad government depends on both government and the people. The government is the people and the people are the government. A person from among the people become the leader over the people, and has the mandate to listen  to the people when ever they call for help, while the people should also work hand in hand with there leader to have a smooth and peaceful rule.
We complain when majority of what happened during the rule of a leader is caused by us, for example a leader with no gaol and purpose for the people campaign and offering gifts. This kind of person will have more followers that someone that have a good agendee for the people, but maybe he doesn't have much funds to bribe people for them to vote for him.

Well @Franklyn-wood, I greet you. My own philosophy about the bad governance system is that the people in power directly have the responsibility to do what is right to lead the people and this is because of the social contract theory that gives parts of the people's rights to the few. And, remember we are talking about Nigeria to be specific. A system where rule of law is not obeyed by the leaders, the people are at the mercy of those in leadership positions. Your voice is not heard because if you talk, you have government agencies coming after you and lots happen to you afterwards, sometimes you are abandoned in jail for your right. So, you see the systems of other countries may differ. That is the reality on ground.