AI-generated NFTs: The next big thing?

[Abiky]

I know NFTs have been in "winter mode" for quite a while, but as with anything in crypto, there's a chance of a comeback in the long run. We've seen how AI-generated images (often proclaimed as art) have been taking the world by storm.

But what if someone turns AI-generated art into NFTs? Will it become viral? Or will it be just another passing fad like the NFT craze of user-made digital art? Also, what are the legal implications of doing such a thing? Will the person selling AI-generated art for profit be accused of copyright infringement (assuming the AI used copyrighted content)?

Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

[asriloni]

But what if someone turns AI-generated art into NFTs?

So that art has become a new way to farming people money. Someone generated AI-art NFT, then he sells it to the market. This is the reason why NFT AI seems terrible idea. It's just giving a way to scammer to create a bubble NFT by generate it, then continuously selling it.

Will it become viral?

It will not. There are so many platforms to generate AI-art NFT such as chaingpt. Has it evern been viral? no it has not. People knew so many shady grifter behind it.

Or will it be just another passing fad like the NFT craze of user-made digital art? Also, what are the legal implications of doing such a thing? Will the person selling AI-generated art for profit be accused of copyright infringement (assuming the AI used copyrighted content)?

It's just a short term hype. There's no exclusivity nor copyright in the AI-art NFT. So this is the reason why many abandoned it, even some accused people are scammer when he's launching AI-art NFT, then sells it for pennies.

To conclude, this thing has no different with pump dot fun.

[MAAManda]

But what if someone turns AI-generated art into NFTs? Will it become viral? Or will it be just another passing fad like the NFT craze of user-made digital art? Also, what are the legal implications of doing such a thing? Will the person selling AI-generated art for profit be accused of copyright infringement (assuming the AI used copyrighted content)?

I've never seen an AI-generated NFT go viral, but if it were AI-generated art, I'd see it. Did you know "Tung Tung Sahur" that went viral recently? It's the work one of our country's creators & it's gone viral worldwide. AFAIK, anything generated by AI isn't copyrighted. So, it shouldn't be a problem if we create art from AI & profit from it financially.

[MArsland]

I know NFTs have been in "winter mode" for quite a while, but as with anything in crypto, there's a chance of a comeback in the long run. We've seen how AI-generated images (often proclaimed as art) have been taking the world by storm.

But what if someone turns AI-generated art into NFTs? Will it become viral? Or will it be just another passing fad like the NFT craze of user-made digital art? Also, what are the legal implications of doing such a thing? Will the person selling AI-generated art for profit be accused of copyright infringement (assuming the AI used copyrighted content)?

Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Whether an NFT goes viral depends on the level of promotion their team does behind the scenes. They have to hire influencers with thousands, hundreds, or even millions of followers to spread fake news about the benefits of NFTs, and so on. This scheme never changes, and I've noticed it on social media over the past few days. Their narrative can turn even a bad project into a good one, but therein lies the problem.

Regardless of whether the NFT was generated using AI or not, it's ultimately difficult to discern its authenticity. Instead of investing in NFTs, I personally prefer to focus on the narrative of AI/robotics agents, which require real-world data to perform household/kitchen tasks.