Government and Crypto Hacks

[KataifiDream]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC. The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others. Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto? If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

[knowngunman]

No source? You should care to include source to your post next time when making post of this nature. From the little information we have from your post, we can not tell how the hacker was tracked and the reason behind the selling of confiscated Bitcoin.

As far as I know, South Korea is a crypto friendly country but with a very strict regulations to prevent fraud and money laundering as we seem to have here in your post. With everything under strict regulations, exchanges are licensed and users are required to do KYC before operating, the government can easily traced illegal activities as long as its carried out in the exchange. However, I don't know how they can justify selling the confiscated coins instead of returning them to the rightful owners. Now you see the importance of adding a source link to your post for the community to read more.

[Stepstowealth]

...

Try including a source next time, it helps people who want to read more and be sure of the legitmacy of your information.

No source?

I searched for the news and found this, https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/03/11/crypto-news-south-korea-liquidates-320-btc-after-bizarre-hack-and-return-saga/?amp=

The government seized the bitcoin from relationship with an illegal gambling operation.

However, I don't know how they can justify selling the confiscated coins instead of returning them to the rightful owners.

They seized it, and since it belongs to the government, I know their actions was mostly legal, and then it seems they did what they have under their law concerning seized properties, the government sells it off and takes the cash.

[SilverCryptoBullet]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC. The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others.

It can be hackers, can be illegal platforms like mixers, gambling sites without license, and can be a freeze by government with other reasons. The common red flag is you never know when it happens, so money in your account can be frozen, seized by government while you are almost unable to do anything to get it back.

Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto?

Yes. Bitcoin blockchain is public, not private, and most of altcoin blockchains are public too so they're traceable.

If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

What will governments do after such seizures is not important if they won't return money to you.
Like $40M crypto seized as Canada shuts TradeOgre exchange

[KiaKia]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC. The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others. Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto? If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

If the bitcoin is from any illegal activities the government have the right to seize it and do whatever they like with the bitcoin, also this amount of bitcoin will be eaten by the present Bitcoin marketcap like nothing happened.

If they will sell or not it makes no difference, we won't even notice that it's been sold, while selling is ongoing buying is also going on, I hate the fact that these money automatically belongs to the government but who are we to blame if not these rules breakers.

I still believe that Government are also stealing those assets too, because if the hacker can returned the stolen bitcoin then the rightful owners of those bitcoin can be traced.

[joniboini]

This is probably the fourth time I've seen news about the South Korean government and crypto this year. The previous ones are talking about how some hackers stole their confiscated funds iirc. It's clear that they need to improve how they handle the funds. I think they managed to drain the confiscated HW or something? Looks like they didn't move the funds from the scammers' HW. Good thing they don't get "hacked" again.

Either hire experienced users with cold storage experience or improve how their management stores funds. CMIIW.

[pawanjain]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC. The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others. Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto? If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

Is this for real ? Why would a hacker send his bitcoins to the government ?
Does it mean the government officials are involved in it and are trying to save the hacker from prison.
Or have they caught the hacker and sentenced him and is selling the confiscated bitcoins in the open market.
I think they should be returning it to the original sender instead of selling it for themselves.

[rat03gopoh]

Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto? If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

The news you're trying to raise has nothing to do with this question. The government certainly has a better understanding of crypto than the average citizen. Their Bitcoin sales (if it's true story) are a way of exploiting crypto for the "benefit" of the state. Further evidence is their dynamic crypto policies; even if they may seem disadvantageous to enthusiasts, they have pursued these policies from a broader perspective and with diverse interests.

[Mate2237]

Every country has its own laws when it comes to crypto what the government of South Korea has done is not different from what most countries dose. Because even in the United States of America the world leading country when it comes to crypto currency confiscate and sell off stolen crypto that were recovered by the government. The government has the right to either make the Bitcoin that were recovered a  put it into the national Bitcoin reserve or sell it.


This is a way of Cracking down on crypto currency thieves, the government of South Korea is only trying to sanitize the crypto community in the country free of criminal elements.

[PrivacyG]

We should not expect every time a Government seizes Bitcoin that they only hold on to it and never sell.  Some of them will not consider it a worthy investment and that is fine.  They should not be necessarily EXPECTED to find out more about Bitcoin.  At least I did not hear about them commenting on how bad Bitcoin is, unlike other Governments I just wrote about in another Topic.

[Zaguru12]

We should not expect every time a Government seizes Bitcoin that they only hold on to it and never sell.  Some of them will not consider it a worthy investment and that is fine.  They should not be necessarily EXPECTED to find out more about Bitcoin.  At least I did not hear about them commenting on how bad Bitcoin is, unlike other Governments I just wrote about in another Topic.

The question is even that is it proper for the government to actually seize properties and hold on to them because one thing I know is that seized properties are supposedly best to be auctioned that is to be sold, for me I think even though I will prefer the government to actually have reserve for bitcoin but let’s be honest it is dishonorable that the reserve will be contained by bitcoin seized, this in no way actually makes them value bitcoin any more but  rather less, a proper or genuine intention of reserve will be them buying their bitcoin and storing.

So best thing is to sell off through auction immediately after court must have granted them legal rights to full forfeiture because this is also another valid process to follow and not by pass rule of law for seizure.

[moneystery]

what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them?

If a government sells its seized Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency, it's their full right to do so, whether for asset liquidation or other purposes. They may still view Bitcoin as a speculative asset, making selling it sooner a safer decision than holding it long-term. However, some governments prefer to hold it as a strategic reserve. It ultimately depends on the decision of each government, as each country has a different approach to Bitcoin.

[AmoreJaz]

We should not expect every time a Government seizes Bitcoin that they only hold on to it and never sell.  Some of them will not consider it a worthy investment and that is fine.  They should not be necessarily EXPECTED to find out more about Bitcoin.  At least I did not hear about them commenting on how bad Bitcoin is, unlike other Governments I just wrote about in another Topic.

Definitely, they won't say anything bad towards this market. The least they can do is be neutral on this market. Because like it or not, they are already seeing the market value of this currency and the minimum they can get from it is to auction the seized coins in the trading market.

[KataifiDream]

No source? You should care to include source to your post next time when making post of this nature. From the little information we have from your post, we can not tell how the hacker was tracked and the reason behind the selling of confiscated Bitcoin.

As far as I know, South Korea is a crypto friendly country but with a very strict regulations to prevent fraud and money laundering as we seem to have here in your post. With everything under strict regulations, exchanges are licensed and users are required to do KYC before operating, the government can easily traced illegal activities as long as its carried out in the exchange. However, I don't know how they can justify selling the confiscated coins instead of returning them to the rightful owners. Now you see the importance of adding a source link to your post for the community to read more.

Oh, sorry it just pops up from my feed.

However, I don't know how they can justify selling the confiscated coins instead of returning them to the rightful owners.

Regarding with this, it is said that the hacker returned the bitcoin to the government. So I guess it is their right to do whatever about the stolen bitcoin. It will also be a long process to track every address to it's rightful owner.

[Dunamisx]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly 320 BTC. They said bitcoin comes from a hacker,

Government and crypto hacks with just be like a thread and needle that cannot be separated, because they are selling out what has been confiscated and claiming the money instead of refunding back those that have lost their fortune as a result of either of this financial mismanagement by hackers, maybe this is where I lose appetite in talking much about government bitcoin reserve, because they are totally not investing but boasting on ceased assets.

specifically using phishing method.

They can make use of any method just to ensure that they scam people, hackers are not ready to take it lightly with anyone vulnerable to their assets, the more they discover that you are getting their new ideas or hacking routes, the more they discover new patterns to use except we are also being updated and informed of some of these.

[As-Soon-As]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC. The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others. Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto? If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them? Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

This is basically seized Bitcoin so we can never expect the government to hold this Bitcoin and hold it for a long time. But as far as I know this seized property or Bitcoin should be auctioned, because the government does not accept such property in any way and sees it as a sale. But I have never heard bad comments from the government about Bitcoin, because it is not dignified to form a reserve with seized Bitcoin. Because those who will hold Bitcoin properly for a long time will basically buy it with their own money and hold it for a long time, that is the main purpose.

[m2017]

This news just come to my feed, and it talks about the government of South Korea has sold roughly around 320 BTC.

Are you probably talking about this news ?

The said bitcoin comes from a hacker, specifically using phishing method. This hacker returned the stolen bitcoin allowing the prosecutor to confiscate and sell it to others.

So that's who's been putting pressure on the bitcoin's price for the last few weeks.

"Key details of the sale include:

Total Amount Sold: 320.88 Bitcoin (BTC)
Sale Period: 11 days (Feb 24 – Mar 6, 2025)
Total Proceeds: 31.58 billion won (~$24.1 million USD)
Destination of Funds: National Treasury of South Korea"

Source

It seems governments have learned about DCA (in this case, not buying, but selling) about maximizing profits.

Does this mean the government are still tracking the world of bitcoin and crypto?

It depends on which government we're talking about. In the case of South Korea, it turns out that yes.

If they have those amount of bitcoin, what do you think of the thought that they just sell it and don't try to study and understand the crypto to make in benefit of them?

They actually profited: took something that didn't belong to them (zero investment), without returning it to the original owners (victims of fraud), and sold it for a profit. Why invest when can simply take it and make millions of dollars out of thin air?

Or can they centralize the world of cryptocurrency?

How? Tell us, and we'll listen.

[sleepfirefly]

...

Try including a source next time, it helps people who want to read more and be sure of the legitmacy of your information.

No source?

I searched for the news and found this, https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/03/11/crypto-news-south-korea-liquidates-320-btc-after-bizarre-hack-and-return-saga/?amp=

The government seized the bitcoin from relationship with an illegal gambling operation.

However, I don't know how they can justify selling the confiscated coins instead of returning them to the rightful owners.

They seized it, and since it belongs to the government, I know their actions was mostly legal, and then it seems they did what they have under their law concerning seized properties, the government sells it off and takes the cash.

many countries actually seize the bitcoin they take from illegal activities. the difference is that some do not sell and some do. for some countries they believe the seized bitcoin will be better off as money while others hold it and add it onto their reserves. it really depends on how the country sees bitcoin and its benefits. either way, the seized bitcoin offers them some kind of benefit short term or long term.

[icoprofits]

Governments sell seized BTC because cash is what they understand. Holding volatile assets doesn't fit how public funds are managed.

[Uhwuchukwu53]

It has been a usual practice by most government either to keep or sell off any seize asset not just on crypto mostly when the seizure is title to be illegal means if getting then from the possessor, and in this case the government can't share it to the citizens or less privilege as they do in most occasion in some items, the only option they have is either keep on their reserve or sell it. Government on their way uses this means to crack down some scammers seizing of their illegal acquired asset of this kind not just Bitcoin alone.