Gambling's okay as long as you keep winning?

[HelliumZ]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning? An interesting take here by a gambler guy in the subway 58 years of gambling, argues that gambling was okay as long as you keep on winning.
I mean, for sure, it's okay if you keep on winning, right? But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.

What's your take on this?

The man is right that you should continue gambling as long as you can win, but this means that you should control yourself and participate in gambling, meaning that if you win, you can bet. When you lose, you should temporarily refrain from gambling.
But is it possible to win at gambling consistently in real terms?
That is, when you lose, you stop yourself from gambling and when you lose, you control yourself and stop yourself from gambling. However, remember that gambling should never be more than entertainment and should never be for the purpose of income.

[Fiatless]

Agreed that gambling is more fun when you're winning but the reality is that it is not always the case, we win sometimes and lose more times yet we are still gambling, it shows that we also know how to accept loses. If every gambler is focused on only winning without expecting to lose that means that we won't be here today because the aim would have been defeated many times. I think that hope, greed and fun are our major motivations to continue gambling even after losing streaks, we continue to gamble because of the aim either to make money or entertain ourselves.

Financial loss is the main factor when it comes to success or failure in gambling. So many people will agree that if you are winning gambling is fine. They don't recognise that gambling could also cause other problems.  Spending so much time on gambling could affect your performance at work and your family relationships. So gambling is not okay when you are sacked from work because you cannot control your habit. It is also not okay when you spend less time with your loved ones because of gambling. So we have to balance it and don't just focus on financial benefits.

[nara1892]

The question now is, is it really possible to consistently win and never lose? You know the answer. And did bookmakers create gambling to waste money and distribute it to gamblers? You also know the answer.
Haha, OMG, I laughed a little when I read the idea of ​​"constantly winning" in gambling. Everyone certainly wants consistent wins, but one thing we have to think about is what activity we're actually engaging in.

[Frankolala]

The question now is, is it really possible to consistently win and never lose? You know the answer. And did bookmakers create gambling to waste money and distribute it to gamblers? You also know the answer.
Haha, OMG, I laughed a little when I read the idea of ​​"constantly winning" in gambling. Everyone certainly wants consistent wins, but one thing we have to think about is what activity we're actually engaging in.

Gambling is an activity that cannot fetch you steady wins no matter how hard you try to come up with various gambling strategies. It's either you lose or win but losses are more in a game of luck. Every gambler wants to always win his bet which is the main reason why he decided to start gambling in the first place but it's not possible.

[viljy]

I don't believe in constant winnings. But let's say it's true. But then why even ask about the permissibility of gambling? I can't believe that a person who constantly wins cares about questions like this - is gambling good or evil? Is it acceptable to win so often? It's all absurd.

[ralle14]

That's the unfortunate part, you can't always win with gambling. The way the guy answered his question like it's a one way ticket to destroying your life through gambling.

I still believe you can have fun in gambling, but it's never going to be fun if you follow his advice and keep trying until you put yourself in debt.

[bitterguy28]

so it’s never okay? haha.

because you’ll never not lose. you will always lose. it’s okay to lose as long as it’s not much and it won’t put you in debt. if your mindset is “never lose” then you’ll end up gaining too much toxic habits.

[blomen]

no. saying “gambling is okay as long as you keep winning” is like saying “there’s no problem with driving under the influence as long as you don’t get into an accident.” if you’re looking at it purely from a financial perspective, continuing to gamble while on a winning streak might seem logical, but the real challenge is knowing when to stop. how can you possibly know you won’t keep winning? the only way to find out is by losing, and by then, realizing your luck has run out won’t do you any good. i’d put it this way: gambling is okay as long as you walk away while you’re ahead.

[Y3shot]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning? An interesting take here by a gambler guy in the subway 58 years of gambling, argues that gambling was okay as long as you keep on winning.
I mean, for sure, it's okay if you keep on winning, right? But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.


Video Link

What's your take on this?

What makes gambling to be fun is your understanding you have about gambling and your primary intentions why you gambling. When you understand gambling you gamble with the mindset that gambling is a game of luck and if you are lucky to experience luck in gambling it makes the game fun and if you lose , you need to stop gambling and come back some other time again.

But if the target in gambling is to make money by all means, then gambling can never be a game of fun, instead it will be game of emotions because you be able to resist how you feel about lose.

[Queen uloma]

Majority of the gambling system are built on what is called the house edge which simply means that odds always favour the casino more than the players. The more you play the more you're likely to lose, that's how the system is designed.
The part, the man mentioned about "fun and enjoyment" seriously needs to be question, most gamblers frame gambling as fun to justify it, after many years of negative results. It can truly be enjoyable if done in balance, but when a person spent 58years in gambling there's a chance they have encounter severe losses, Regardless of whether they highlight them or not.

[bubilas]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning? An interesting take here by a gambler guy in the subway 58 years of gambling, argues that gambling was okay as long as you keep on winning.
I mean, for sure, it's okay if you keep on winning, right? But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.


Video Link

What's your take on this?

It's a pretty funny opinion that gambling is good as long as you win. And at first glance, this seems to be a fairly well-reasoned view of gambling, because with this strategy, at the moment when you lose, you still have a reserve of money. And in the end, you won't be in the red anyway, and you'll have a lot of fun. But the disadvantage of this strategy is that you can spend money while you have it, but when you're done, you'll probably have 0, and I think it won't be very pleasant emotionally. In general, not everything is as simple in gambling as it always is.

[EarnOnVictor]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning?

Permit me to view it beyond your context. 1. Religiously, it might be a no no for some most people. 2. Neutrally, it's a yes, and 3. Selfishly, it's also a yes. For 1 and 2, the moment they start losing, the story will change.

But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.

Let me believe that you conclude this for him by saying he knew that gambling is bad, is gambling bad? He never said that, did he? Playing down on something doesn't affirm the opposite of the initial position.

Above all, gambling could be good or bad for a particular individual depending on why they gamble and how they handle their gambling activities.

[Fortify]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning? An interesting take here by a gambler guy in the subway 58 years of gambling, argues that gambling was okay as long as you keep on winning.
I mean, for sure, it's okay if you keep on winning, right? But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.

What's your take on this?

He is clearly in denial and anyone who thinks of themselves as a gambler is likely to have this problem. It's a protection and coping mechanism that is built into everyone - minimize or even try to suppress the memory of losses because it creates pain. Realistically unless you are a professional poker player who is tracking their income or buoyant enough to know they are in the money, then casino players and people placing sport bets on the whole are not going to be making bank. Casino odds simply don't allow it over a long time frame even if you get a few short and lucky streaks. Mega wins are so rare it's like finding a bag of money that fell off a security truck - just forget about it because it's unlikely to ever happen.

[junder]

Is gambling okay as long as you keep winning? An interesting take here by a gambler guy in the subway 58 years of gambling, argues that gambling was okay as long as you keep on winning.
I mean, for sure, it's okay if you keep on winning, right? But can we keep on winning? In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.


Video Link

What's your take on this?

Of course, it would be great if you could keep winning at gambling, but in reality that’s not how it works losses happen more often. Even if someone claims that, I doubt they actually win every single bet they place because if that were the case it would make sense to treat gambling as a source of income.

Unfortunately, we can’t keep winning at gambling. Even those who are experienced or professional gamblers don’t seem to win all the time.

[atookz]

The issue is that we cannot always get lucky at gambling. Only in the long term can almost no one win. We all are aware that the gambling systems are programmed in a manner that the organizers are always at advantage. Gambling is not allowed even at the time when one is winning. The victory is a short-term state of affairs whereas the threats are of a permanent nature. Actually, I believe that it is hazardous to win in the initial stages of gambling. It may cause an individual to become overconfident and keep on gambling. Therefore, an individual is not only permitted to gamble because he or she is achieving wins, but because he or she is ready and accountable to gamble.

[JoyMarsha]

I guess people know that, nothing on earth will give them steady winning without losses. They will for sure encounter winnings and losses at intervals, leaving them with the option of continuing or quitting.

Gambling as it is, I don't think there is anyone who doesn't know they will lose on that, but the hope of winning someday keeps ringing in their head that keeps their hope alive to gamble as always because they don't know how soon the winning would be. Let them gamble anyway

[noorman0]

-snip-
In the end, he ended up saying about the fun and enjoyment, which I think is a denial, he knows that gambling was bad.

Gambling won't let you win consistently; it's not in the casino's algorithm. If they can't beat you technically, they'll fight you through shady rules. Unless you become their "messenger," usually if you have a large social following and they realize it.

[sunsilk]

What's your take on this?

Yes, he's right and we all agree with that. But we know the reality that we can't win at all times. A lot of times we'll lose and that's still justifying what he's said for as long as we're winning.

And as we lose, that means that it's okay and that's our take whether to continue or stop it already when we're having more losses instead of winning.

I would gamble always if I have that stat of winning accuracy but let's admit the fact that it is unlikely that we'll always win.

[Hypnosis00]

Well, it is very, very okay. But we have to admit the fact that winning consistently is impossible. However, despite being in this kind of situation, I believe that gambling remains entertaining. Unless the reason for coming here is for money only.

I've been asking several gamblers around why they keep going to the casino. I'm not sure if they are telling lies or the truth, but they say they are looking for some luck. But I understand since they are old already. And I believe they are doing this not for money but to make their life happy.

[iBaba]

The question now is, is it really possible to consistently win and never lose? You know the answer. And did bookmakers create gambling to waste money and distribute it to gamblers? You also know the answer.
Haha, OMG, I laughed a little when I read the idea of ​​"constantly winning" in gambling. Everyone certainly wants consistent wins, but one thing we have to think about is what activity we're actually engaging in.

I also imagined the idea behind such thoughts o. How will someone think they will be able to make a steady win throughout their gambling career. Then that is no longer gambling now. Maybe we call this a giveaway. Gambling has the reasons why it is called gambling because of its features. Gambling they say is an act of risking your money on uncertain and chance based events to be able to win more money as a result. If that is what gambling is by its simple definition then have a perpetual winning is no longer gambling, it has changed its form from gambling to probably something else.