x10,000 on Plinko, would you chase it?

[Bitinity]

...

Its rigged bro no way anyone will EVER get that. You know how much money they would lose? They created the gsmbljng code to always hit the one next to it if anything but never the 10k x that is absolutely ridiculous

The game itself is provably fair, so if you say that it is rigged then you should also provide a solid evidence. This is serious accusation to say a game is rigged while the game itself is developed by the most popular casino in this crypto gambling industry "Stake". In fact, there are many users who have hit that 10,000x since the game is upgraded with this new max multiplier. I am not sure what is your main reason to say it is rigged, is it due to tiny chance to hit the max multiplier only or just because of your own feeling? If it is due to the low chance to hit max multiplier, means that you are also willing to say all games with possible huge multipliers are all rigged?

[dwyane36]

The game itself is provably fair, so if you say that it is rigged then you should also provide a solid evidence. This is serious accusation to say a game is rigged while the game itself is developed by the most popular casino in this crypto gambling industry "Stake". In fact, there are many users who have hit that 10,000x since the game is upgraded with this new max multiplier. I am not sure what is your main reason to say it is rigged, is it due to tiny chance to hit the max multiplier only or just because of your own feeling? If it is due to the low chance to hit max multiplier, means that you are also willing to say all games with possible huge multipliers are all rigged?

Usually, people make these kinds of unfounded accusations against the casino when they’re tilting after a long losing streak.
As for Plinko and the x10k multiplier, I wouldn’t say it comes up all that often, but looking at the leaderboard, yes, over the past few days, there have been a few lucky players who’ve actually managed to land such a huge multiplier.

[Cointxz]

The game itself is provably fair, so if you say that it is rigged then you should also provide a solid evidence. This is serious accusation to say a game is rigged while the game itself is developed by the most popular casino in this crypto gambling industry "Stake". In fact, there are many users who have hit that 10,000x since the game is upgraded with this new max multiplier. I am not sure what is your main reason to say it is rigged, is it due to tiny chance to hit the max multiplier only or just because of your own feeling? If it is due to the low chance to hit max multiplier, means that you are also willing to say all games with possible huge multipliers are all rigged?

Usually, people make these kinds of unfounded accusations against the casino when they’re tilting after a long losing streak.
As for Plinko and the x10k multiplier, I wouldn’t say it comes up all that often, but looking at the leaderboard, yes, over the past few days, there have been a few lucky players who’ve actually managed to land such a huge multiplier.

Every casino that offers x10,000 max win on Plinko usually being hit by whale players. I remember Duelbits launch a promotion back then to reward user that will first ever hit x10,000 on their plinko.

Only few hours last until someone manage to claim the rewards. There’s no way casino can rigged a provably fair game and there’s no point for them to do that considering of the odds that hitting it is very small while they can profit from the house edge of this game in the long run.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Yes but it depends. When I play casino games, I tend to go for high multipliers because they have a negative expected value (EV)—and since I’m going to lose money in the long run, I’d rather be able to cash out a big win when I get lucky. But I don’t "chase" them. I just bet on them every now and then, knowing what’s at stake. The OP himself says you have to bet 32,000 times on average to win that 10,000 multiplier. The math is clear.

[seoincorporation]

Every casino that offers x10,000 max win on Plinko usually being hit by whale players. I remember Duelbits launch a promotion back then to reward user that will first ever hit x10,000 on their plinko.

Only few hours last until someone manage to claim the rewards. There’s no way casino can rigged a provably fair game and there’s no point for them to do that considering of the odds that hitting it is very small while they can profit from the house edge of this game in the long run.

I didn't know this, but this multiplier is kind of new on stake, i used to chase the x1000 on that casino and got it a couple of times, but now the x10k is a crazy challenge for me, isn't easy to get it, i stil trying but no luck yet. Lets see if this week is the good one.

I know this kind of multiplier is really hard to hit, but they aren't rigged; they are totally possible with the right luck.

[tread93]

...

Its rigged bro no way anyone will EVER get that. You know how much money they would lose? They created the gsmbljng code to always hit the one next to it if anything but never the 10k x that is absolutely ridiculous

The game itself is provably fair, so if you say that it is rigged then you should also provide a solid evidence. This is serious accusation to say a game is rigged while the game itself is developed by the most popular casino in this crypto gambling industry "Stake". In fact, there are many users who have hit that 10,000x since the game is upgraded with this new max multiplier. I am not sure what is your main reason to say it is rigged, is it due to tiny chance to hit the max multiplier only or just because of your own feeling? If it is due to the low chance to hit max multiplier, means that you are also willing to say all games with possible huge multipliers are all rigged?

No i'm not saying that Stake has rigged the system or anything, honestly it is reassuring that there is known number of users who has hit it. How many users have hit it approximately and do we know what the total winnings were? I am saying that mainly because I feel like it is such a crazy multiplier for any casino that no casino would ever make it easily attainable that it would have the slimmist chance of winning if that, but apparently I am proven wrong with my gut feeling. It was all a gut feeling. Stake is a good casino platform and yes to your point one of the most popular, of course besides rainbet 

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I’ve played Plinko a few times, but it’s not a game that’s really grabbed me. I mean, no, I wouldn't chase it, mainly because I don’t like the game itself, but I do enjoy trying to land big multipliers in general, in other games. Although you have to bear in mind that if you’re offered 10,000 to 1, you’ll have to bet well over 10,000 times on average to hit it, as in this case, more than three times that amount. 

[crwth]

I wouldn't chase that. It's like simulating real data and then wanting to have a single point of outlier to get that x10,000. This wouldn't be ideal if you are not ready to bet at least x100,000 times.^{(This number could vary depending on your appetite)}

The only time I would chase this is if I were doing it in a simulation. 

[fruktik]

I've noticed a trend in this game. As soon as you start increasing your bet, your chances of winning significantly decrease. If you play with the minimum bet, the maximum multiplier appears more often. So how is it possible to win under these conditions? I've tried changing my strategy many times, but it's all in vain. The casino has everything covered, and there's no point in overexerting yourself.

[Bitinity]

Every casino that offers x10,000 max win on Plinko usually being hit by whale players. I remember Duelbits launch a promotion back then to reward user that will first ever hit x10,000 on their plinko.

Only few hours last until someone manage to claim the rewards. There’s no way casino can rigged a provably fair game and there’s no point for them to do that considering of the odds that hitting it is very small while they can profit from the house edge of this game in the long run.

I didn't know this, but this multiplier is kind of new on stake, i used to chase the x1000 on that casino and got it a couple of times, but now the x10k is a crazy challenge for me, isn't easy to get it, i stil trying but no luck yet. Lets see if this week is the good one.

I know this kind of multiplier is really hard to hit, but they aren't rigged; they are totally possible with the right luck.

The 10,000x is indeed new on Stake but the 5,000x is not because there was a time when Stake upgraded the plinko game with max win 5,000x but it was not last longer. Frankly I prefer the old one with the max 5,000x because I hit it few times long time ago but too bad Stake decided to downgrade it back to 1,000x max win in few months if I remember it correctly. I havent tried this 10,000x since I have been inactive on Stake for months now. What you need is pure luck to hit the 10,000x so the question is when will your luck come? Every single day, there are many Stake users who are lucky enough to hit it, starting from those who bet cent(s) up to few dollars bet. Hope you'll find your luck soon.

[savetheFORUM]

I only got x1000 once in high mode with minimum bet but if I count from when I first played the game I still suffered losses, plinko is a really difficult game and requires a fairly large deposit even when betting with the lowest bet, from the 200 bets I made the highest multiplication was only x5, since then I no longer focus on chasing high multiplications in plinko and switched back to slot games which I think are still quite easy to get luck and/or small wins.

More loss in a stat is only normal if we continue playing gambling. Plinko is just like any other game, I mean it has a different difficulty level that we can adjust. So if only we choose the lower-risk, then our losses won't also be that huge or often. Add in if we also bet minimal amounts and has a control over our game time.

But in fact, if I can compare chasing 1kx multi in Plinko over 1kx in Keno, Plinko is more easier to hit. This is not only based on my experience but also on other many players too on Stake casino. But if about Plinko and Slots, I think i can also agree with that. The reason is because in higher levels of Plinko, there is a hallow at the centre (full of 0.xx) but in slots, any multipliers are possible to hit.

[Julien_Olynpic]

I'm not sure that even after playing tens of thousands of games, I'll reach such a multiplier. That's why I don't waste my time on Plinko. Yes, this game is fun, but it's not just a money-guzzler; it's also a time-guzzler. So you immediately lose both money and time. And we don't know how random this win will be. Wasting time and money on Plinko is insane. Play for fun and stop when you get bored.

[topbitcoin]

There needs to be great luck for this because we cannot just hold on to how many rounds we do and how many levels of difficulty are faced so I am very lazy to pursue something like this.
That's not bad but the reason I avoid games like this is because I don't want myself to go too far because I definitely can't control myself Well when I'm trying to focus on a pursuit like this.

So, even though it is very feasible in terms of prizes but I do not want myself to be dragged down and I am more avoiding and looking for other game alternatives that allow me to control myself more strongly against the game.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Yes but it depends. When I play casino games, I tend to go for high multipliers because they have a negative expected value (EV)—and since I’m going to lose money in the long run, I’d rather be able to cash out a big win when I get lucky. But I don’t "chase" them. I just bet on them every now and then, knowing what’s at stake. The OP himself says you have to bet 32,000 times on average to win that 10,000 multiplier. The math is clear.

But I don't actually think betting 32,000 times to win the x10,000 multiplier is a guarantee, that is, we can't be very sure that after betting and betting and betting, and you manage to count bets you've made without any mistake up to the 32,000th one, that the next bet after that will be you winning the x10,000 multiplier, I do not think this is how this works because if it actually is, then this can be manipulated.

For example, I could on the game well determined to achieve that result, I will be the minimum amount the game requireds to accept a bet, I will do this until the 32,000th bet and after that, In the next bet, I will go for the maximum, that is, if I had been betting $0.1 all this while as the minimum amount required for the system to accept your bet, after the 32,000 game, i could bet $10,000 or more if I can afford that amount or more to not only win the maximum multiplier, but also win the maximum jackpot of the casino..
If this is how it works, then any can actually decide when to win this multiplier and this is not supposed to be so if you ask.

[maydna]

There needs to be great luck for this because we cannot just hold on to how many rounds we do and how many levels of difficulty are faced so I am very lazy to pursue something like this.
That's not bad but the reason I avoid games like this is because I don't want myself to go too far because I definitely can't control myself Well when I'm trying to focus on a pursuit like this.

So, even though it is very feasible in terms of prizes but I do not want myself to be dragged down and I am more avoiding and looking for other game alternatives that allow me to control myself more strongly against the game.

Indeed because plinko needs luck to win but we can play for some time. But if we don't have luck, we can lose the money. It is good if you limits your money but if not, your losses will be bigger.

We can't just hold on to how many rounds we do as that don't gives guarantee to us to win. If your luck comes, you will win in just one round and have the money but chasing the win in plinko needs to calculate how many rounds you can play.

If you are difficult controlling yourself, it is better you don't play any gambling games.