Your bank account is a reflection of the type of problem you solve.

[Zigabel]

I have come to the conclusion that how rich a person is, is directly proportional to the quantity of problems that you solve daily. There is no secret when it comes to wealth creation, if you wants to be wealthy then you have to look out for problems in your immediate environment and solve them because money in itself hides under problems.The richest people in the world today are all offering solutions to universal problems that is why they are rich. A man whose bank account is reflecting  lack of funds is a man that is not only poor in his account but, also is a man that lacks problem solving abilities. How Rich or por a man is depends on the ability of any individual to render solutions remember the poor masses are the once always complaining without having anything to offer and is not ready to change their situation. The rich and wealthy class in our society are the solution givers as they offer services and products which the rest of the society buys into.

This is not always the case most times, there are people who has a service they are offering and some a product they are producing there by solving problems daily according to your description but they are still not as rich or wealthy, they are only trying to make ends meet daily, beyond just solving problems is a whole lot involved to get one rich and out of poverty. Not all rich and wealthy men got to that status by just solving problems and offering or rendering services, some inherited it and got good managerial skill to manage and keep the money and so they were able to retain the wealth even long after they were been handed the wealth as inheritance.

[Pablo-wood]

This is not always the case most times, there are people who has a service they are offering and some a product they are producing there by solving problems daily according to your description but they are still not as rich or wealthy, they are only trying to make ends meet daily, beyond just solving problems is a whole lot involved to get one rich and out of poverty. Not all rich and wealthy men got to that status by just solving problems and offering or rendering services, some inherited it and got good managerial skill to manage and keep the money and so they were able to retain the wealth even long after they were been handed the wealth as inheritance.

I think that is where audience size matters. The larger the audience affected the more problems solved and in turn the more money gotten. We don't expect someone in a very lonely area where people hardly pass make as much money as one who is in a large market that is crowded. Same thing as someone who has large audience online whom they can sell to cannot be compared to someone in a crowded market. This is why I said the audience size matters too the more people our solution affects the more wealthy we become and that also determine how much of our needs can be met on a daily base.

[Hewlet]

I have come to the conclusion that how rich a person is, is directly proportional to the quantity of problems that you solve daily. There is no secret when it comes to wealth creation, if you wants to be wealthy then you have to look out for problems in your immediate environment and solve them because money in itself hides under problems.The richest people in the world today are all offering solutions to universal problems that is why they are rich.

It's one thing to know how to solve problem and another thing to ensure that as you're solving problems, you're able to monitize it because that's all that matters the most.

Having a skill doesn't even equate to being wealthy because most times, the ones that are supper skilled and solve problems that's related to Thier area of expertise ends up working under someone that has the management knowledge.

[bhadz]

How about people like me and the others who chose to fill their Bitcoin wallets to hold more and considers it as a savings and our bank accounts? We might have some solution to the real world problems but they're minimal and it's better not to be exposed with that because others might see you as their competitor for the business that they have built. It differs per situation and it's not going to be for all what you have said. Because there are people who are plain savers and they don't like to take risks so, we can't judge someone based on that factor.

[Doan9269]

I don't know how our bank account could be a reflection to the problem we have solved, because the question to ask here is should it be when we are more richer or have lesser in our account and couldn't afford much fund on it, I think we should concentrate much on investing on people and in capacity building, this tells how much richer we are when those around us are more comfortable and cold attest to the fact that we have invested in them on diverse aspects that could alleviate them, everything does not end with money or power, but the influence we made.

[Bitcoin Smith]

The problem-solving idea is different from being someone who solves the problem, I guess one needs to be the former to get rich because let's say a plumber who solves an issue but is he rich already no, but one who solves the problem and able to sell that for millions or billions which can be a simple hose connector but need to be unique and attractive enough to convince the people to buy it.

[Majestic-milf]

 Supposing you don't have the means to solve these problems then?  In my country, everyone has the ability to solve problems but not everyone has the opportunity and means to do so. When you identify that there is a problem, you'd need capital to carry out the task of solving. Most rich people who were able to float their bank accounts were able to do this cause they saw a situation that needed fixing and were able to satisfy the need of their target audience because they have the means to do so. Some rich people use their funds to proffer solutions, which when people begin patronizing them, they get their monies back or some meet their equally rich friends to be able to invest and then things move smoothly.

[Shadiq]

In reality, the picture is different. Does the same sentence apply to a child born in a poor family and a child born in a rich family? Then why can a boy from a rich family become rich without solving any problems? I think, it is necessary to be rich to solve problems. Otherwise, you have to work hard.

I will agree that only intelligent hardworking people achieve success, but because we measure success in terms of money, we cannot identify the right successful person. Most of the rich people create problems themselves and solve them themselves. For example, the United States is monopolizing the entire war market, but they create wars in the world. The number of rich people among honest solvers is very small. There is no need to chase problems to make money, but set a goal and live an honest life. Owning a lot of money without forgetting honesty is not success!

[ZAINmalik75]

I have come to the conclusion that how rich a person is, is directly proportional to the quantity of problems that you solve daily. There is no secret when it comes to wealth creation, if you wants to be wealthy then you have to look out for problems in your immediate environment and solve them because money in itself hides under problems.The richest people in the world today are all offering solutions to universal problems that is why they are rich. A man whose bank account is reflecting  lack of funds is a man that is not only poor in his account but, also is a man that lacks problem solving abilities. How Rich or por a man is depends on the ability of any individual to render solutions remember the poor masses are the once always complaining without having anything to offer and is not ready to change their situation. The rich and wealthy class in our society are the solution givers as they offer services and products which the rest of the society buys into.

The rest of the world buys them because they have money to start, they have enough money to shovel that people will be forced to buy their stuff, because whoever has the money can sell easily with money but it does not mean the poor with less money can't sell anything, they have done a lot. But my take is that it is easier for the rich than the poor.

I have seen poor creating tools, and stuff that was never sold to the innovative world until a rich person backed that stuff up. Because money is essential too.
Other than this, you are right, if someone wants to make money, be a problem solver, but some guys are just problem creators.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

There is a powerful truth in what you say solving problems creates value and the value creates money. But if you take this as the sole cause of all wealth then I think it is oversimplified. There are countless people in the world who solve complex problems every day such as teachers or doctors or small business owners but yet they are not rich. Because solving a problem alone is not enough how many people that solution reaches scale and how much it is leveraged. These two things are equally important. So wealth is not just the result of hard work or problem solving but rather the result of smart distribution and system building.

Teachers solves the problems but the school benefits, teachers are solving the problems of teaching the student but the school owns everything they get the money and then pay the teachers a small portion.
Doctors may solve the problems but the hospital gets the money.
Solve an important problem and it will reflect in your finances, but solve the problem as the owner and not working for the owners.

[Ziskinberg]

I actually believe that those who work so hard and go out from their comfort zone early and now everything has paid off and are ready to reap their profitable outcome do reflect on how high their savings account in the bank. Well they do invest their time, money and energy into it just to assure a growing bank account, so I think this is not something new, they only reap what they sow.

However, I also accept the reality that some are just born with high savings account in the bank because they are born with wealthy parents. They don't work for it, but their parents do, but at the end of the day everything their parents gained will surely be for the welfare of their kids.

[abhiseshakana]

There is a powerful truth in what you say solving problems creates value and the value creates money. But if you take this as the sole cause of all wealth then I think it is oversimplified. There are countless people in the world who solve complex problems every day such as teachers or doctors or small business owners but yet they are not rich. Because solving a problem alone is not enough how many people that solution reaches scale and how much it is leveraged. These two things are equally important. So wealth is not just the result of hard work or problem solving but rather the result of smart distribution and system building.

Teachers solves the problems but the school benefits, teachers are solving the problems of teaching the student but the school owns everything they get the money and then pay the teachers a small portion.
Doctors may solve the problems but the hospital gets the money.
Solve an important problem and it will reflect in your finances, but solve the problem as the owner and not working for the owners.

I think world of earning income is not as simple as the OP describes. Not all fantastic solution highly paid. In my country. teacher paid very low even many of their life is miserable. Will be not fair if we say that somebody poor because they don't work hard and not create value for other people. It's like me saying that people can be rich because they are too stingy in sharing, poor in empathy and different starting lines due to leverage or choice options. When OP talking about bank account, he doesn't aware that as financial intermediaries, bank collecting money from poor dan rich people but giving loan to party that need it which mostly is rich people who borrow money with their asset for their personal interest, which mean using capital from poor people to make rich people richer which already have access and capacity.

Social and economic gap is a problem that is eternal and passed down across generations and until now many government can not solve it. Poverty not only about diligent or lazyness, its also about the ruler in the top of the inverted pyramid who created the economic system dredge money from the bottom of the pyramid to the top of the pyramid.

[khiholangkang]

How many problems have you solved now and how much money is in your account today? Is it really working for you or not? If not, it doesn't seem like it's possible for someone to have a digitized amount in their bank account.
Every problem has a price to settle, some of them have to have capital and knowledge, basically we have to have the main basis first before acting in problem solving, maybe you are also aware that there are not many problems that can be solved easily in society, and we can't compare with those billionaires, they have tremendous support from their families and neighborhoods, while you also know what your position is, right?

[Joy_learns_crypto]

I think world of earning income is not as simple as the OP describes. Not all fantastic solution highly paid. In my country. teacher paid very low even many of their life is miserable. Will be not fair if we say that somebody poor because they don't work hard and not create value for other people. It's like me saying that people can be rich because they are too stingy in sharing, poor in empathy and different starting lines due to leverage or choice options. When OP talking about bank account, he doesn't aware that as financial intermediaries, bank collecting money from poor dan rich people but giving loan to party that need it which mostly is rich people who borrow money with their asset for their personal interest, which mean using capital from poor people to make rich people richer which already have access and capacity.

Social and economic gap is a problem that is eternal and passed down across generations and until now many government can not solve it. Poverty not only about diligent or lazyness, its also about the ruler in the top of the inverted pyramid who created the economic system dredge money from the bottom of the pyramid to the top of the pyramid.

Working hard may not make you solve problems in a way that you will change your financial status, I wrote that teachers aren’t paid because school fees aren’t paid directly to teachers and other money sent to the school.
Teachers who start their own private classes, selling their books, have a social media learning account earns more than a teacher who is just only teaching for a school.

[Y3shot]

The rich and wealthy class in our society are the solution givers as they offer services and products which the rest of the society buys into.

I agree with you because being rich is not just about the amount of money you have in your account. If you are a problem solver and you have value that people can benefit from, then you are rich because the idea and the problem you solve are valuable, and this can be used to generate income. Some people think becoming rich is about struggling to have a lot of money in their account.

If you want to be rich in money, you must be able to be a problem solver and someone who can add value to the lives of others. A lot of people have so many problems in the world today, and they are desperately looking for solutions.

[Maslate]

I've known a person who is good in problem solving, he ended up tired and drained mentally, physically and emotionally, and yet his savings is still not growing. So part of what you have said are not true.

However, there are also those people who just find their own luck, chase every opportunity that comes, and put hard work and passion in everything they do, now they are living a good and comfortable life, the perks of seeing poverty as an inspiration to strive harder and never stop targeting success.

In the end, your bank account may or may not reflect of what type of person you are. It's actually more than that.

[HyperCodexV]

I have come to the conclusion that how rich a person is, is directly proportional to the quantity of problems that you solve daily. There is no secret when it comes to wealth creation, if you wants to be wealthy then you have to look out for problems in your immediate environment and solve them because money in itself hides under problems.The richest people in the world today are all offering solutions to universal problems that is why they are rich. A man whose bank account is reflecting  lack of funds is a man that is not only poor in his account but, also is a man that lacks problem solving abilities. How Rich or por a man is depends on the ability of any individual to render solutions remember the poor masses are the once always complaining without having anything to offer and is not ready to change their situation. The rich and wealthy class in our society are the solution givers as they offer services and products which the rest of the society buys into.

This is true to some extent, people who solve valuable problems usually gets rewarded for it. But I don’t fully agree that a low bank balance means someone lacks problem solving ability. Sometimes people are skilled and hardworking but don’t have the right opportunities, exposure or support to turn their solutions into money.

I think wealth is a mix of solving problems, timing, access and sometimes even luck. Not everyone who is struggling is just complaining, some are still trying to find their way or build something meaningful for themselves.

[Odogwu-Blockchain]

I actually believe that those who work so hard and go out from their comfort zone early and now everything has paid off and are ready to reap their profitable outcome do reflect on how high their savings account in the bank. Well they do invest their time, money and energy into it just to assure a growing bank account, so I think this is not something new, they only reap what they sow.

However, I also accept the reality that some are just born with high savings account in the bank because they are born with wealthy parents. They don't work for it, but their parents do, but at the end of the day everything their parents gained will surely be for the welfare of their kids.

People born with born with this kind of love usually larvish the money because they don't understand how getting those things work, the relaxation that they bothering nothing about what may or maynot come in the future.

Such training is risky, doesn't allow children to make out their own ways

[slapper]

There's a difference between solving a problem and solving a problem that the existing market structure is able to monetize. Teaching a kid in a rural area how to think critically, that's solving a problem. Caring for elderly people, huge problem, truly needed, society disintegrates without it. But neither of these scores very well on the wealth scoreboard. The economic infrastructure around them was established to underpay or not pay at all. The pricing mechanism for solutions is in itself an outgrowth of choices, historical and political.

At some point, you need to decide on what taste of problem-solver you want to be. Because some people work their whole career trying to solve problems they contribute to inflating in the first place. Some industries are literally running on manufactured complexity. Finance, insurance, some parts of tech. You can get very rich doing something that nobody else really had before you invented it. Does the bank account still "reflect" something meaningful then?

We should then look the idea of intentionality behind the solving. I do believe the people who feel authentically good about where they end up financially tend to be people who were obsessive around the work first and aware of the money second. The obsession with the problem itself tends to generate a depth of competence that generic money-chasing just doesn't generate.

I do not like it implies that one way is innately better. Like poor are the complainers and rich are the solvers. That's too neat. Some very rich people inherited systems that were already working. Some very poor people are solving real and important problems, but problems for which there just happens to be no structural compensation. Collapsing that into a moral sorting (rich equals competent, poor equals lacking) is the part that does the most damage, I think.

The idea that your bank account is a reflection of something? Yes, probably. But of what exactly?

[shinratensei_]

There are cases where people are solving critical world problem only for the patent to be owned by the company, so this statement isn't exactly hold truth in the real world reality.
The only thing that make this unfair is to solve a problem, you need capital to execute the plan and actually get something out of it. Remember nicola tesla? plenty of problem solved by him only to be poverty stricken in the last days of his life.