CryptoCasinos.ai - My new review project

[Jake_CCAI]

Hello all, I have been a Bitcointalk user since around 2015, but this is my new account dedicated to my new crypto casino review project, CryptoCasinos.ai.

I am kind of scared to post this as I have worked almost full time for this site for 6 months now. So if I get crushed here, I kind of feel I get crushed too But I think I am strong enough now and I am open to critisism and feedback. People should be critical towards new projects in crypto and I think that is a good thing. Btw, this is a solo project, so I am in charge of everything starting from design and writing the reviews. My wife is the only one who helps a bit verifying all reviews one more time.

Shortly: It's a new kind of a review site that aim to be the most trusted source for legit casinos. Why: I use AI to search Reddit and forums to find which casino has the most trusted reputation online. Based on the reputation, I will sort casinos objectively. No fake spots or fake reviews that are paid by the casino. Of course, I will put some personal input to the reviews, but the major Trust Score comes 100% from my AI scrapes.

Disclaimer: Yes it's an affiliate site, as building a site like this is a tons of hard work. But, the site is free to use and you don't have to click the affiliate links if you don't want to. I will not add affiliate links on this thread, they are only on my site.



Top crypto casinos based on my studies (updated March 27, 2026)

CRYPTO CASINO (links to my reviews)	TRUST SCORE	MY VERDICT
#1 Crypto.games	72.6 / 100 (Trusted) with 75 mentions	✔ Operating since 2014 with a spotless reputation for payouts. ✔ High Trust Score: The only casino in 2026 to pass the 65+ threshold. ⚠ Strict VPN policy and KYC required.
#2 BitStarz	58.2 / 100 (Good) with 47 mentions	✔ Strong reputation in Reddit. ✔ Excellent customer support. ⚠ Strict KYC policy and the use of VPN is not recommended.
#3 Wild.io	48.9 / 100 (Average) with 27 mentions	✔ Massive selection of 9000+ games. ✔ Great bonuses and VIP benefits. ℹ VPN usage is not forbidden, but KYC checks may happen.
#4 Cloudbet	41.7 / 100 (Average) with 28 mentions	✔ Long history: Operating since 2013. ✔ Transparent bonus model: 10% rakeback system is fair. ⚠ KYC problems and strict VPN policy.
#5 7Bit Casino	32.3 / 100 (Risky) with 42 mentions	✔ Huge bonus pack with low wagering (35x bonus). ⚠ Negative sentiment on Reddit. ⚠ Declining popularity against newer competitors.
#6 Stake	30.2 / 100 (Risky) with 450 mentions	✔ Just awesome UI. ✔ High VIP rewards and solid background. ⚠ Low Trust Score: surprisingly negative player sentiment on Reddit.
#7 Coins.Game	10.0 / 100 (Avoid) with 33 mentions	✖ A critical Trust Score of 10/100. ⚠ Withdrawal friction: Frequent reports of KYC traps. ⚠ Inadequate support.
#8 BC.Game	10.0 / 100 (Avoid) with 80 mentions	✖ Company was declared bankrupt in 2024. ✖ Negative player sentiment on Reddit. ⚠ Use of VPN is forbidden, KYCs have problems.

Here's the scale I use right now for the score labels. A score above 50 is already very good, as crypto casinos encounter a lot of negativity in overall.

65 – 100 Trusted
50 – 64 Good
35 – 49 Average
20 – 34 Risky
0 – 19 Avoid

I may adjust the scale in the future, but now it's like this. I wanted to put 65+ to get a Trusted label, because if the scale was like on other affiliate sites (most casinos getting 95+ or 4.8+ result), almost all casinos would get poor ratings on my list. One casino with a really good overall reputation (Crypto.games) rated 72.6 / 100, so I think that is a quite good scale point to start. When I get more experience developing the AI models and crawlers, I probably edit this scale to be the most suitable for this use.

I will update this page regularly when the scores are updated and I add more casinos to the list.


Edit: I removed my Bonus EV study from this first post, as it may have been misleading to some of you. I will never want to recommend low rated casinos, and this new table is maybe a bit more clear. If you want to learn more about my Bonus EV study, go to my dedicated post here.


Thank you for your time, and I hope this post has some value to somebody
Cheers, Jake

[Jake_CCAI]

Reserved post.

[Zwei]

I use AI to search Reddit and forums to find which casino has the most trusted reputation online. Based on the reputation, I will sort casinos objectively. No fake spots or fake reviews that are paid by the casino. Of course, I will put some personal input to the reviews, but the major Trust Score comes 100% from my AI scrapes.

how do you deal with the fake posts from shills on reddit? i would imagine a lot of not so good casinos try to fake their reputation using shills, so the data the AI will use to determine a casino reputation might not be 100% reliable.
also most people don't share their positive experiences from a casino on reddit, so a casino that is reputable might not look like it if you only check reddit.

for example, bc.game risk score is definitely deserved, but the stake one, i'm not sure about that.





but i like how this is not just another affiliate site that is using AI as a gimmick and the reviews are just garbage, even without the AI reddit score, the crypto.games review is quite good (comparing it to a Nokia 3310 was quite funny and on point), if the others are as good then you did a good job OP.

[notblox1]

I would not base full verdict for casino only based on reddit, when we know they are often censoring posts, and there are many paid posts.
I think you should include posts from bitcointalk forum and from social media like X, than combine all three into one summary on your website.
This way you would get more precise results, but I never fully trust anything coming from AI.

[Jake_CCAI]

how do you deal with the fake posts from shills on reddit? ...

Yeah you have very good points, I have thought those a lot!

About fake posts & shills, my AI scrape commands rule out all spam posts (with referrals, DM requests etc.). Most of shills will be excluded with minimum karma & user age limits. Also short messages will be excluded away.

Of course, the model is not perfect but I have to start somewhere. I keep on developing the scrape model as AIs and my knowledge gets better. My aim is to create a model that would first scrape thousands of threads and comments (like a Google crawler), and only after that make the analysis based on thousands of comments. But I can't yet build that, maybe in the future.

About Stake: I wondered the same why the results weren't so good. BC.game: totally agree on the result, it's probably accurate.

But: I have tried the AI scrapes using multiple (paid) AI models and they seem to give same kind of results. So, as Stake is the market leader, it probably gets also a lot of hate with KYC policies and from players who just lost to the casino etc.

That is a thing I have to solve is that a skewed result or not, regarding Stake.


Thanks for the feedback anyway, I appreciate it a lot!

[Jake_CCAI]

I would not base full verdict for casino only based on reddit, when we know they are often censoring posts, and there are many paid posts.
I think you should include posts from bitcointalk forum and from social media like X, than combine all three into one summary on your website.
This way you would get more precise results, but I never fully trust anything coming from AI.

Good points, thanks for the feedback! I actually have included Bitcointalk and some other cryptocurrency forums to the results, so it's not only Reddit. I probably have to fine tune the commands so, that X will also be included with a bigger emphasis.

But yes, Reddit may not be the best place to base the verdict solely. I have to think how I could write more precisely to the headings that it's not just Reddit, but Reddit & forums.

Edit: This is actually a very good and major point. I may change the whole tagline from this "Play on crypto casinos Reddit trusts" to something like "Play on crypto casinos Reddit, X and forums trust". But I think this over the weekend. Big thanks for the feedback

[CryptSafe]

BC.game: totally agree on the result, it's probably accurate.

Thanks for the feedback anyway, I appreciate it a lot!

You agree to the results on BC.game, and you still have them on your list on OP. So far, there have been lots of complaints about the casino on this platform which majority of them is yet to be attended to, and till this moment, they have yet to respond to some of the allegations against them, if I am not mistaken. So putting them up on your list seems some how disciuraging to even visit your review website because it seems you do not even do a proper findings before putting up a casino on your list.

[Jake_CCAI]

You agree to the results on BC.game, and you still have them on your list on OP. So far, there have been lots of complaints about the casino on this platform which majority of them is yet to be attended to, and till this moment, they have yet to respond to some of the allegations against them, if I am not mistaken. So putting them up on your list seems some how disciuraging to even visit your review website because it seems you do not even do a proper findings before putting up a casino on your list.

You are right on that, I should've added my Trust Scores to that bonus analysis. As BC.game is the last with the minimum 10/100 (Avoid) Trust Score. Let me rebuild the first message on this thread to a more informative form, I will be on it tomorrow (friday). I'll skip the bonus analysis now, as that may have mislead you.


And, please read the review first before fully judging me: https://cryptocasinos.ai/bc-game-review/

If you don't want to, here's the first chapters of the review:
"In my investigation, it turned out that BC.game can not be recommended because of bankruptcy declaration in 2024, other security issues and the very low Reddit sentiment.

Despite the casino’s success before, the companies behind BC.game (Blockdance B.V. and Small House B.V.) were declared bankrupt in 2024 by the court of Curaçao. While the company representatives disagree with this, I think these things alone are a good reason to avoid BC.game now.

I still wanted to do my own research. Based on my AI-assisted search, BC.game gets a very low Trust Score of 20.0 – Avoid. This is not unexpected, as the bankruptcy news are widely known on Reddit and forums.

If that low score wasn’t enough, my Trust Score overrides were triggered, as both 7-day and 30-day sentiment are greater than 75% negative. This brings the score down to 10.0 (Avoid) out of 100. Read more, how my review methodology and these overrides work."


And thanks for the honest feedback, I appreciate it!

[CryptSafe]

You agree to the results on BC.game, and you still have them on your list on OP. So far, there have been lots of complaints about the casino on this platform which majority of them is yet to be attended to, and till this moment, they have yet to respond to some of the allegations against them, if I am not mistaken. So putting them up on your list seems some how disciuraging to even visit your review website because it seems you do not even do a proper findings before putting up a casino on your list.

You are right on that, I should've added my Trust Scores to that bonus analysis. As BC.game is the last with the minimum 10/100 (Avoid) Trust Score. Let me rebuild the first message on this thread to a more informative form, I will be on it tomorrow (friday). I'll skip the bonus analysis now, as that may have mislead you.


And, please read the review first before fully judging me: https://cryptocasinos.ai/bc-game-review/

If you don't want to, here's the first chapters of the review:
"In my investigation, it turned out that BC.game can not be recommended because of bankruptcy declaration in 2024, other security issues and the very low Reddit sentiment.

Despite the casino’s success before, the companies behind BC.game (Blockdance B.V. and Small House B.V.) were declared bankrupt in 2024 by the court of Curaçao. While the company representatives disagree with this, I think these things alone are a good reason to avoid BC.game now.

I still wanted to do my own research. Based on my AI-assisted search, BC.game gets a very low Trust Score of 20.0 – Avoid. This is not unexpected, as the bankruptcy news are widely known on Reddit and forums.

If that low score wasn’t enough, my Trust Score overrides were triggered, as both 7-day and 30-day sentiment are greater than 75% negative. This brings the score down to 10.0 (Avoid) out of 100. Read more, how my review methodology and these overrides work."


And thanks for the honest feedback, I appreciate it!

It is good for you to admit it, but do you not think it would be nice you totally avoid listing them here than putting it up because it shows an indirect way to you still promoting their presence here as players who do not take out time to read for a better understanding might just be in a hurry to register on the platform without any knowledge of what is going on and they get trapped while dealing with the casino do you not think about that?

[The Cryptovator]

Shortly: It's a new kind of a review site that aim to be the most trusted source for legit casinos. Why: I use AI to search Reddit and forums to find which casino has the most trusted reputation online. Based on the reputation, I will sort casinos objectively. No fake spots or fake reviews that are paid by the casino. Of course, I will put some personal input to the reviews, but the major Trust Score comes 100% from my AI scrapes.

Disclaimer: Yes it's an affiliate site, as building a site like this is a tons of hard work. But, the site is free to use and you don't have to click the affiliate links if you don't want to.

I can understand; every review site uses its own affiliate links. But make sure no one is going to fall into a scam due to your review and affiliate links. A few users might start following you blindly; it's your responsibility to make sure you aren't adding something scammy on your review sites. Usually it's hard to trust any online reviews for casinos or other crypto sites. Faking reviews is pretty easy online.

Forum review: you can trust it; it came from established and trusted members. Make sure your rating isn't based on newbies' reviews. It's easy to purchase or fake reviews on the forum as well, but trusted members won't fall into a trap for a penny and might not post a false review here. Because other members will counter them on the forum if something is suspicious.

[Haunebu]

As someone who has been regularly advertising crypto.games for a long time now within this forum, I feel great to see it on top of the rankings especially considering the fact that it was based on reddit reviews which is the most toxic social media outlet out there.

I like the design of your site and your bonus evaluation strategy though you should integrate more social media platforms like the others mentioned for a clearer picture overall. All the best op.

[Jake_CCAI]

It is good for you to admit it, but do you not think it would be nice you totally avoid listing them here than putting it up because it shows an indirect way to you still promoting their presence here as players who do not take out time to read for a better understanding might just be in a hurry to register on the platform without any knowledge of what is going on and they get trapped while dealing with the casino do you not think about that?

Now the first page of this thread has been changed to better form. It has now the Trust Scores listed clearly and I moved the Bonus EV study behind a link. Maybe it's more clear now?

I never want to recommend casinos that have low ratings. I need some money to cover the running costs, but I have never needed and wanted the money from semi-scammy casinos. I think I can't yet upload images here, but here's one as a link:
https://cryptocasinos.ai/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cryptocasinos-ai-screenshot.png

From that you can see that all the casinos rated "avoid" have their CTA links marked as "Not recommended". I thought it a lot if I should add affiliate links to those casinos at all, or just disabled the buttons. But I decided to go with this model, as it makes the whole website UI more intuitive, as all buttons work the same way. Some people want to see the low rated casinos anyway (to see contrast to the better ones), so in that way the UI works well. But like everything, I may change this in the future to make different color CTAs for low rated casinos, no affiliate links etc, but let's see.

In my experience from affiliate sites dating back from 2015, usually the 99% of clicks and traffic go to TOP 3 or so. The last low rated casinos hardly get ANY clicks or ANY signups, so luckily people are wise and they do read the table scores.

I can understand; every review site uses its own affiliate links. But make sure no one is going to fall into a scam due to your review and affiliate links. A few users might start following you blindly; it's your responsibility to make sure you aren't adding something scammy on your review sites. Usually it's hard to trust any online reviews for casinos or other crypto sites. Faking reviews is pretty easy online.

Forum review: you can trust it; it came from established and trusted members. Make sure your rating isn't based on newbies' reviews. It's easy to purchase or fake reviews on the forum as well, but trusted members won't fall into a trap for a penny and might not post a false review here. Because other members will counter them on the forum if something is suspicious.

Yes, good points! My site is a one-man site (and a little help from my wife), so I can never compete with the bigger affiliate sites in the number of casinos, SEO budgets etc. So in fact the only way for my site to succeed is to stay trustworthy and true. As a Finn, that's also the only way I can really function so I am being honest in reviews, now and in the future.

I have crypto casino affiliate site experience from 2015, so I do know how this business usually works (casinos offer great rev share deals to boost up reviews, and that's how the trustworthiness starts to break). I have made enough money from my last affilate site, so money isn't the #1 reason building this site. As long as I just make my monthly fees, that's all I need. Also I want to change the whole crypto casino affiliate scene to a better one, so I hope my project can disrupt the scene somehow in long term.

About your second point: I am on to develop my AI crawl models so, that they will put more value to Bitcointalkers with more Merit & Trust. Also, newbie comments and users with low Merit & Trust will get ignored totally. Right now, it already takes care of those things, but I am developing a 100% bulletproof model. It's online probably in a month or so.

As someone who has been regularly advertising crypto.games for a long time now within this forum, I feel great to see it on top of the rankings especially considering the fact that it was based on reddit reviews which is the most toxic social media outlet out there.

I like the design of your site and your bonus evaluation strategy though you should integrate more social media platforms like the others mentioned for a clearer picture overall. All the best op.

Thank you for the great feedback! It warms my heart to hear you like the design, I have worked so hard on it fine tuning margins pixel by pixel and making it work almost perfectly on desktop and mobile. Cheers

Like I wrote before, I am developing the model to include as much social media & forum data as possible. I tested X.com messages yesterday, and that may be too spammy for my recent models. It's so hard to evaluate real reviews from X as it's totally unmoderated right now. So for now, I am leaving X out of the crawls. Generally it's hard to measure the trustworthiness of X users as crypto influencers with 200k followers can be as crooked as any bot thesedays. But I have few ideas to extend the crawls to have a wider exposure to different forums & medias.

[Pmalek]

I wouldn't rely on AI to find reputable casinos. Take Bitstarz as an example. It currently sits at second place in your table. Check out the reputation of their representative on Bitcointalk. They have negative feedback and a supported flag to their name.

Also, if you do a "site:bitcointalk.org BitStarz" search, all you see is scam accusations and negative comments.

[Abelly]

You agree to the results on BC.game, and you still have them on your list on OP. So far, there have been lots of complaints about the casino on this platform which majority of them is yet to be attended to, and till this moment, they have yet to respond to some of the allegations against them, if I am not mistaken. So putting them up on your list seems some how disciuraging to even visit your review website because it seems you do not even do a proper findings before putting up a casino on your list.

You are right on that, I should've added my Trust Scores to that bonus analysis. As BC.game is the last with the minimum 10/100 (Avoid) Trust Score. Let me rebuild the first message on this thread to a more informative form, I will be on it tomorrow (friday). I'll skip the bonus analysis now, as that may have mislead you.


And, please read the review first before fully judging me: https://cryptocasinos.ai/bc-game-review/

If you don't want to, here's the first chapters of the review:
"In my investigation, it turned out that BC.game can not be recommended because of bankruptcy declaration in 2024, other security issues and the very low Reddit sentiment.

Despite the casino’s success before, the companies behind BC.game (Blockdance B.V. and Small House B.V.) were declared bankrupt in 2024 by the court of Curaçao. While the company representatives disagree with this, I think these things alone are a good reason to avoid BC.game now.

I still wanted to do my own research. Based on my AI-assisted search, BC.game gets a very low Trust Score of 20.0 – Avoid. This is not unexpected, as the bankruptcy news are widely known on Reddit and forums.

If that low score wasn’t enough, my Trust Score overrides were triggered, as both 7-day and 30-day sentiment are greater than 75% negative. This brings the score down to 10.0 (Avoid) out of 100. Read more, how my review methodology and these overrides work."


And thanks for the honest feedback, I appreciate it!

It is good for you to admit it, but do you not think it would be nice you totally avoid listing them here than putting it up because it shows an indirect way to you still promoting their presence here as players who do not take out time to read for a better understanding might just be in a hurry to register on the platform without any knowledge of what is going on and they get trapped while dealing with the casino do you not think about that?

Your point is that mentioning the names of risky or suspicious platforms can inadvertently promote them. However there is a limit to avoiding them altogether Because without specific examples many new users will not understand which platforms or behaviors to avoid. In my opinion balance is key Rather than giving a direct list, it is more effective to highlight red flags or signs of risk such as unusual bonus offers, unclear terms, lack of licensing or repeated complaints in user reviews. This way, people learn to do their own research and don't blindly jump into a platform. Creating awareness is the key. Whether you mention names or not real protection is only ensured if users are taught to do their research read the terms, and understand the risks.

[CryptSafe]

It is good for you to admit it, but do you not think it would be nice you totally avoid listing them here than putting it up because it shows an indirect way to you still promoting their presence here as players who do not take out time to read for a better understanding might just be in a hurry to register on the platform without any knowledge of what is going on and they get trapped while dealing with the casino do you not think about that?

Now the first page of this thread has been changed to better form. It has now the Trust Scores listed clearly and I moved the Bonus EV study behind a link. Maybe it's more clear now?

I never want to recommend casinos that have low ratings. I need some money to cover the running costs, but I have never needed and wanted the money from semi-scammy casinos. I think I can't yet upload images here, but here's one as a link:


From that you can see that all the casinos rated "avoid" have their CTA links marked as "Not recommended". I thought it a lot if I should add affiliate links to those casinos at all, or just disabled the buttons. But I decided to go with this model, as it makes the whole website UI more intuitive, as all buttons work the same way. Some people want to see the low rated casinos anyway (to see contrast to the better ones), so in that way the UI works well. But like everything, I may change this in the future to make different color CTAs for low rated casinos, no affiliate links etc, but let's see.

It is better this way, how you mark it. At least it is clear and more visible to all to see for themselves and know what to do if to continue or to stop with whichever casino they deem fit to play with.

The ratings score would also help to figure out the extent to which they can be trusted to deal with, and that already would determine if players would like to continue with them or not, but however, I will suggest you highlight the word avoid in red colours, signifying danger, as it would be very quick to alert visitors to read about the casino on your OP so that they would not make any mistake of getting aboard that casino platform.

[Hispo]

Surprisingly low points for both Stake and BC, in my opinion. Considering how trusted and reliable they seem to be when asked to the Bitcointalk community.
Also, when comes to Reddit feedback, you need to keep in mind that most of the time people on reddit share their negative experiences on casinos,.while at the same time they keep quiet when things are working good and there is nothing negative to point out to.

It happens with all kinds of services, people make their voices to be heard when something wrong happened to them,.otherwise there is nothing to say.

Also, it does not take any meaningful effort for some casino to spam reddit as well, in the same manner they have spammed review sites like Trustpilot in the past.