Do you think placing 3 different bet on same game could make you win?

[serjent05]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

Why not do a calculation? (Correct me if I am wrong here) How much you bet, what are the odds you chose, and how much you will win. Basically, we are spending 3x the amount of money in here (if the bet is the same )than the normal betting. So mathematically we need a minimum of 3.0 to break even. If we need to win, an odd that is more than 3.0 is needed... So with this, do you think we will win @OP if the odds available in the bet options are less than 3.0?  I am disregarding the house edge here.

[Mate2237]

This is not a very advisable thing to do for a gambler this is because, in as much as playing thesame bets multiple times on the same game using the same option can make you to sudden becomes rich. But at the same time it can also ruin your life and so it's not a too good idea to bet on one game all over again. When the game you are targeting to doesn't go your way.


Always split your game and make sure that no two games is theame in your betting slips. Doing this is always better as it can help reduce loss in the part of the Gambler.

[EluguHcman]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

OP I am honestly stressing to understand you better but so far it seems I am familiar with this strategy, it is usually like replacing your bets on the opposite decision to backup your risks but as long odds are not going to be the same, so we should also know that higher odds + higher potential returns= higher risk to lose.

The opposite side (lower risks) outcomes could be vice.
I don't also know if you mean the otherwise where bettors bets on duplicating particular game ticket with same betting option, of course that does not make any profitable strategy for me.

[Findingnemo]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

You mean if the possible results are three and you want to bet on three possible results for that game using three different bookmakers and think is it smart move? Nope, it will be a guaranteed lost even after you win the bet unless you win the result with odds above 3x just to manage the wagering of three games then forget about the win you are just back to square 1 even after the win.

[Muba20]

If money is placed on 3 different bets on a football match at the same time, there is no way to guarantee that the gambler will make profit because the odds will not be high on all of them. The odds will be high on one bet and very low on the other. If you place bets on three, then if you lose two and win one, it may not be possible to cover your entire money with that win. I never believe in such bets. If you want to accept your profit and loss well, I think it is better to place money on a specific bet. If you win, you will get a big win, and if you lose, you will have to accept that loss. If after placing money on three different bets, the winning amount is less than the entire bet, then I think it is safe to place money on one bet.

[Mia Chloe]

You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

Well if you are too obsessed with winning you'll end up losing. If you place multiple counter bets on the same game you will lose even if you win of of the three because of how the odds are distributed across them.

Take for example you bet on the team to win to lose and still to draw, if they end up winning you'll lose the other two bets and the odds from them winning cannot cover the losses alone. It's more brutal if both teams are considered top teams because the odds would be way smaller.

[Bitcoin.com97]

You many end up losing all , because placing the game multiple times may not increase your chances of winning but lose , that strategy doesn’t guarantee winning but sometimes taking such risk could also be profitable if luck is on your side , so it’s not actually advisable for gambler to not indulge in such .

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

Placing 3 different bets on the same game only increases your chances of winning, such as placing a bet on the exact team that will win the match on the first bet, while on the second bets you could go about placing a bet on Over/Under to determine the total number of goals the match is likely to end with. While the third bet might be a bet on the total number of corners the game is likely to end. However, there is one strategy I always see people use, and that is by targeting games whose odds are quite high but not outrageous, simply odds between 5 or 6 odds, and then monitor the live game to see If the team you predicted to win is losing and the opponent is winning, and then you place a bet on the opponent team to win, since it's odds will increase. As you just keep monitoring the odds on the live match and keep betting as the odds increases and decreases.

[Stalker22]

I think what you should do is to go for possible odds that could actually cover up your expenses, for instance; if you are dealing with a game that has 3.0 odds or 4 odds and you can possibly bet on 3 different market with just any amount, whereby if you place the bet it would cover up your expenses for the other market or strategy.
Let say, since is 3 odds or 4 odds, you can actually gambling with 40$ whereby each could possibly be 10$ or 5$ per bet and, if you win you make back your money from the other bet so easily. Although, this type of there is no profit rather you would only recover what you had already lost while gambling.

Maybe it would be best if you show your strategy on a concrete example with real odds because, sounds like you are describing a "break-even" strategy that is mathematically designed to fail because you are ignoring the house edge.  No bookmaker will allow you to place multiple bets on the same match so that in the worst case you cover your entire bet.  If that were possible, bookmakers would go bankrupt very quickly.

[freedomgo]

I know you're just being strategic but this kind of betting method will not make you win more, but its going to be the opposite instead and you will only increase the chances of losing. The house has always an edge in every bet, so the more you bet, the bigger chances for them to win.

However, gambling can be so unpredictable by all means. But you can try it out even for today, at least you will know if the winning probability increases or you are just putting your funds at a higher risk of losing. Experience will teach you though.

[Dunamisx]

It's very possible that we play different games while gambling and once they are not the same, our chances of winning may increase even though, we also stand the chance of risking much more money for stake, but don't be surprised that even with all this you may consider doing, one can still lose at the end despite every effort to ensure winning, because gambling is unpredictable to some certain extent no matter how harder we try.

[terrific]

This might cost you more money instead if you're going to win only one from those bets.
Since each game has a lot of prop bets that you can bet, I think you're saying to the prop and that's just fine.
It all stays still about the amount of bet that you're going to put in it which you should be able to deal with if they all lose.

[Hispo]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

I think you would be basically just increasing your exposition to market volatility, instead seeking for consistently.
This is actually just a way to deplete your bankroll even further.
Moneyline with a single pick sounds more conversative and engaging than dividing your attention into three possible outcomes for your betting session.

Sometimes it is better to keep things simple, specially if one has limited bankroll.

[Shadiq]

I prefer two bets instead of three. When there are two teams playing against each other where both teams are capable of winning against each other but the bookmakers are giving preference to one team, then betting on the side and the other can be somewhat profitable. For example - in the Liverpool vs Manchester United match, the odds were 6-8 times higher in favor of Liverpool than the odds were in favor of Manchester United. If someone had bet $10 on both teams, he would have definitely made a profit, even though the match was won by United.

However, the chances of losing are higher this way. When the odds on both sides are more than 2, you can place the bet on both sides if the probability of a draw is very small, in which case you can put more risk. This can sometimes bring big profits, but is very harmful strategically.

[TopT3ns]

I prefer two bets instead of three. When there are two teams playing against each other where both teams are capable of winning against each other but the bookmakers are giving preference to one team, then betting on the side and the other can be somewhat profitable. For example - in the Liverpool vs Manchester United match, the odds were 6-8 times higher in favor of Liverpool than the odds were in favor of Manchester United. If someone had bet $10 on both teams, he would have definitely made a profit, even though the match was won by United.

However, the chances of losing are higher this way. When the odds on both sides are more than 2, you can place the bet on both sides if the probability of a draw is very small, in which case you can put more risk. This can sometimes bring big profits, but is very harmful strategically.

The speculative strategy of splitting bets on two conflicting teams is very interesting to experiment with to exploit the market value discrepancies. I understand that there is a chance of high gains and at the same time, there is the possibility of a loss of all gains when a draw appears to be a disincentive. Yes, it is true that the success of such a strategy depends on proper choice of matches that have very low chances of an equal result, the draw.

[Hazink]

You many end up losing all , because placing the game multiple times may not increase your chances of winning but lose , that strategy doesn’t guarantee winning but sometimes taking such risk could also be profitable if luck is on your side , so it’s not actually advisable for gambler to not indulge in such .

And that will be one of the most painful things. You know, when someone has made all the plans thinking they have found a perfect way to win, but even after all the effort, the increased risk and later ending up losing all three bets with all the amount put into it, it will only give the person back the sense of thinking about the aftermath instead of just focusing on the winning side.

[Hypnosis00]

That is not a smart thing to do. Even if you win 1 of them, you still lose. Meaning, you lose every game even if you win.

This is a desperate move. If you plan to try that strategy, I suggest you stop because you will only regret it. You're not going to make money from it.

To remind ourselves that no matter what we do, we can't defeat the casino. Instead of formulating a strategy that puts us at high risk and incurs more losses, we'd rather just hope for luck.

[Kelvinid]

They say the more you bet, the more chances of winning, but the fact is, this is not reliable with gambling. We may spread out our bets, but the fact remains that we are still bound to lose, because that's how the casino works, the house should always win so they can gain maximum profits, while seeing us in total loss.

This is just based from my personal experience. Yours might be different though, but as long as it is gambling, everyone is actually bound to lose, only the casino stays in profits here.

[Odogwu-Blockchain]

You many end up losing all , because placing the game multiple times may not increase your chances of winning but lose , that strategy doesn’t guarantee winning but sometimes taking such risk could also be profitable if luck is on your side , so it’s not actually advisable for gambler to not indulge in such .

I can't do such, it's the worst strategy I can take, so if I include this same club into 3 different tickets because I trust them enough just for it to destroy all my tickets, I can't do that.

I've experienced many of this kind of predictions, it's not always end well, it brings disaster to tickets many times.

[odunybiz]

Yes, it's always possible to hit those kinds of bets if you know how to ride the trends and what stats they're good at.

This was one of the same game parlays I had a few years back during the World Cup, and others would even combine these with player props. It's not an easy strategy, but it's a great alternative when you've run out of choices, and only confident in a specific match.

Most people  don't really get what OP is exactly saying. Most people think he is trying to outsmart bookmakers placing bet on all three outcomes (win, draw and win). If this is what he's hoping for then, he is wrong. No profit can be make trying to outsmart bookies. Even during the days of football arbitrage, it isn't easy as bookmakers has there ways of outsmarting them. Sometimes they set a limit on amount you can bet on certain match. They may reduce odds of matches from your account and many more. I think @ralle got him right. Placing different outcome on the same matches just like he quoted in his message. Although I don't think all bookies accept it or may be there are games it only work for. It never works from my side here but I see people posting such parlay where you bet on different outcome in a single match. Such parlay could work if you are certain about the team involved and very sure of their pattern of play. Predicting with that for some team may look easy. Although that doesn't guarantee winnings as we can't really overlook luck here as well.