Do you think placing 3 different bet on same game could make you win?

[Makus]

Well, you could actually get lucky with it but this is something I wouldn't risk, if I'm betting differently I think it's a bad idea to play the same game even though they are different options, it is advisable to play different games entirely that way it becomes less riskier. There is no road map to success when it comes to gambling or betting, you can apply any strategy you think of and still end up losing that is just how the game works. Placing three different bets isn't going to give you a guaranteed profit, this is not certain at all

[Mindyspace]

I understand the idea, but it's not a guarantee of winning. You can still lose even with several bets and still pay more fees to the betting site.

I think choosing the right entry point and managing your bankroll is more important. I could be wrong, but that's what it seems like...

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I understand the idea, but it's not a guarantee of winning. You can still lose even with several bets and still pay more fees to the betting site.

I think choosing the right entry point and managing your bankroll is more important. I could be wrong, but that's what it seems like...

What other fees does a loser pay to the betting site that is different from the money he or she already lost?, definitely can't be withdrewal fee you are talking about because you and I know that when the bettor had already lost his money on betting, there won't be anything else to withdraw, so?

Anyways, you are right though, the idea is understandable but it's one that is of high risk still, like I did mention on my last comment on this thread, it's possible to win but..
1. There is absolutely no guarantee of winning.
2. The risk of losing at the end is very high because you will need to win a bet on a high odd to break even before thinking of making profit..

So, in the end, this turns out to be just as betting on parlays and chasing high odds, winning chances is very slim.

[Agbamoni]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

Yeah, that's not a smart strategy. The odds will determine if the bettor will profit or not. If the odds are such that any outcome in the game can fit all odd then the bettor will be in profit.

For example, an odds of Over 1.5, GG, a particular team to score at least 1 goal. Out of the 3 options, you have a higher chance of winning all 3 but in a case where no team scored, it will turn out to be a disappointing moment for the bettor. This is a terrible strategy for anyone to use in the long run.

[len01]

What do you think?

In sports betting, there’s no method or strategy that can guarantee wins. Bookmakers have already priced the odds across all markets to make sure there’s no real loophole to exploit and everything stays balanced. So the strategy you mentioned won’t really improve your chances of winning, if anything, it just increases the level of risk you’re taking.

[Vaculin]

Even if you place more of it, there are still no guarantees that you will win and make profits. Or if ever you win, the profits you will make is still lower than the amount of your lose bets, so I don't take as a real win.

Just recognize the certain fact that in gambling, its always the bettor losses, regardless of the total bets. If not, casinos are probably closing operation these days because there are actually gamblers who will do their best just to hit the max win, even if it means losing a huge amount of deposits.

[Cantsay]

I understand the idea, but it's not a guarantee of winning. You can still lose even with several bets and still pay more fees to the betting site.

I think choosing the right entry point and managing your bankroll is more important. I could be wrong, but that's what it seems like...

If given the opportunity to choose between the OP’s proposed strategy and just a normal strategy, I definitely would go with the normal strategy because not only is your profit low, it also exposes you to lose three times more than you’d have lost if you just bet on a single game.

If I ever want to bet on multiple games, I’ll make sure they are different and not the op is describing, that way is better.

[AVE5]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

You're right, there's only going to be a confidence on the bet outcome that you'd have every means to win one of the bet at whichever way the outcome maybe but to be realistic, there's no going to be possibilities to make profit in such betting strategy except you win on the bet with high odds which potential profits should be able to cover up the loose of others.
Verily not a smart strategy for experience bettors. But I won't be in doubt that some adamants would doesn't consider risk factors may adopt this scheme while they may realize they stupidity lately because someone with the right senses won't make such improper betting decision.

[Dunamisx]

If we are to ask everyone about what you want regarding gambling, then majority would have come out boldly to profess what they want as to why they are gambling, one of the things we can't deny ourselves from is the truth regarding our expectation in gambling, as everyone want to earn from it, not minding weather if there is any chances of winning or not despite several attempt to win a bet.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

It would've helped if we knew the selections you would be making, then we can determine the efficiency and uncertainty around those picks. Placing even 10 different bets on a match outcome never guarantees that you would even recover your capital, not to mention of having profits, so I can still describe it as chasing profits in the shadows and would result in long-term losses.

I like to bet on cards and corners when two strong team meets each other. I know it would always be some sort of power tussle, so we would have lots of fouls and cards coming through.

[bitbollo]

There are many issues with this "system" of gambling.
First the basics. It is impossible that the sum of your 3 bets in the same platform (and placed in the same time) could get a positive edge.
You can achieve this profit only by get an advantage (edging or "greening").
Or you can just trying to arbitrage by placing bets on different bookmakers.
This as you may know would lead to arbitrage betting that has many risks...and give also a small profit.
Here there is another point. The profit. Yes you can achieve a win. Probably you can get a winning streak.
But it's evident that this is not a valid method in the long time and only 1 bet lose or you can't edge will erase immediately any profit.
Last but not least. Bookmakers would not love this way to play/gamble...

[Cityhunter34]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

This strategy can never profit you in the long run, rather it will definitely turn you to something else because it's obvious that you would be spending much money on them. Although, one might likely get lucky with it but just that you will be ready to accept losses in good faith without thinking of chasing them back because this strategy is more of losses than winnings so if you can stick to it then you can go ahead with it, after all gambling it's a personal decision.

[maydna]

I prefer to bet on single than placing 3 different bet, that will just increase my bet amount if I really lose. But if I just place 1 bet, my lose will not big and that is the amount that I can afford to lose.

No need to chase the win by placing 3 bet because we never know which one will win. Instead losing all bet, we can reducing the lose amount by only placing 1 bet.

But if some people willing doing that, that will be up to them. Perhaps they already consider what may happens and if they lose, they can accept the lose.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

I think its not gonna get you more profit but only confuses your mind on what to bet since your aim is to bet and win. Its not different I guess when you bet on two sides for black or white game and expect some win. What will happened in this startegy is you end up paying more money instead of profiting in the bet.

As a gambler its our instinct we used to win a bet plus there is a thrill on winning once you finallly nailed it. By this method you dont have that and just fooling yourself attaching bets to different team.

[ruykeri]

If we are to ask everyone about what you want regarding gambling, then majority would have come out boldly to profess what they want as to why they are gambling, one of the things we can't deny ourselves from is the truth regarding our expectation in gambling, as everyone want to earn from it, not minding weather if there is any chances of winning or not despite several attempt to win a bet.

But the way the op said about betting, although this is not realistic, but here the aim is only to make a profit. The loss that can happen here cannot be accepted by gambler . This can lead a gambler's mental thinking in a different direction. No matter how you bet, there is a possibility of losing. If you cannot accept that, if you decide to bet on emotion to get back the lost money, then there is a possibility of getting addicted to gambling very soon. You should accept losing and bet. Because no matter how you create a system in gambling, there will be a possibility of losing.

[Kelward]

Well, you could actually get lucky with it but this is something I wouldn't risk, if I'm betting differently I think it's a bad idea to play the same game even though they are different options, it is advisable to play different games entirely that way it becomes less riskier. There is no road map to success when it comes to gambling or betting, you can apply any strategy you think of and still end up losing that is just how the game works. Placing three different bets isn't going to give you a guaranteed profit, this is not certain at all

If any strategy will give you a guaranteed win then it's not gambling anymore, whatever way you want to manoeuver the house to get a sure win the bookmakers have already thought about it and they won't give you an easy chance to take their money. Choose whatever strategy you want but make sure you're using amount that you can afford to loose that is where I'm concerned about because at the end you can lose your bet. I prefer to place one bet and see how it goes for me, if I win I take it but if I lose I'll accept it and move on, luck plays a major role in gambling generally.

[Italian Panic]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

Betting on all three possible outcomes of the same match on the same platform will result in a guaranteed loss due to the built in margin applied by bookmakers, where the total of the odds exceeds 100%. There is a type of arbitrage where, by betting on the same match using two or three different bookmakers, the sum of the odds is less than 100%, thus guaranteeing a profit in any case. However, these practices will result in you being banned from the platforms, and the returns are, in any case, negligible and would yield very little money.

[X-ray]

I don't think placing 3 different bet would increase your chance to win. If you're doing sure bet (win, draw, win) bet, it's surely lead your account to be banned by the casino. So, you can do multiple bets into the bet that won't lead you to the sure bet.

However, i remind you this is pretty much the same like parlay. the greater odds, the bigger risk. Adding more bets even when you're doing it in the same game can make you have greater chance to lose.

So, doing multi bets in the same games won't increase your chance to win. Anything that lead you get guaranteed win in betting will lead you to the ban coz casino doesn't like it. That's my reason betting on multiple top clubs to win the game(separate) is always preferable.

[Dunamisx]

If we can take the risk to play different beds on the same game could also increase our chance of winning from either of the three, but there is no assurance that this will come as we wanted at the same time, when it come to staking as well, we should not use a huge amount of money to do that because everything may end up on losses and we wouldn't want to miss out after every attempt made to win and we still end up losing despite the high stake at risk.

[Julien_Olynpic]

It's not entirely clear what three different bets the author of the topic is referring to. He was writing about betting on two opposing teams within the same match. Perhaps he means the following: the bankroll is divided into three equal parts and bet on the first team to win, the second team to win, and a draw. If so, this is a guaranteed-loss bet. After all, no matter the outcome of the match, you lose either way. If Team A wins, you lose your bets on Team B and the draw. The same applies to the other team winning. In the event of a draw, you lose your bets on both teams to win.