Do you think placing 3 different bet on same game could make you win?

[Salahmu]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

This type of strategy is called hedging or covering bets. The strategy look smart, because you will have a separate slip for team A, team B and two separate slips for their draws just in case they play draw.

You don't understand the strategy op meant, he is not talking about three different matches playing differently, what he meant is that if Manchester United is playing with Arsenal, he would bet Arsenal to win, Manchester United to also win and lastly also play them a draw and this is only in one match he is talking about, did you get the point now?, so actually if you understand the strategy you will not see it to be smart because you will definitely loss even if one part of the bet wins, this is abnormal strategy in gambling because what it only result is for the gambler to loss.

[Questat]

Do you think casinos have not seen it in advance? Of course, they do.

Its never new at all, a lot have tried that strategy to work, but they all end up only increasing their losses. One is enough, but doing it consistently will probably put you into a bigger loss, much more than what you anticipate.

Let's just face the fact that there can be no way to beat the house. If you insist doing this, its like you are just playing like a fool. You want to take an edge over the house, yet you end up being taken advantage of.

[Rabata]

You will end up being in loss; let's assume you made 3 different bets on a particular game. 1 bet option is with 1.5 odds. The 2nd bet option is the same or a little bit above. And the 3 bets have the same odds or a little bit more. If you win one of the 3, there is no way your winning will be able to give you a profit that will cover up all the staked amount unless if one of your option is with 3 odds and above and that’s where the winning comes from; I will call that pattern an easy way to lose money, not a smart strategy.

I think so, placing 3 different bet on the same games actually can't guarantee still profitable or win but its avoid will get draw and get back capital regarding if one match win but two matches left get loss. Firstly make speculation about odds each three placing bet balance or not before make this speculation, however if the same odds for three bet placing I think the final result only get back your capital.
I don't think good way for gambler placing until three bet at sport betting, why not choose with difference option like place bet for both team win the match or scoring the games. Its more interested and possibility will earn more for placing difference bet at sport betting.

Yes, there is no certainty of winning even in such a bet. A decision can be made by reviewing the odds of the bet. Gambling is definitely risky but if a gambler bets on all 3 of a same football game, his risk will be less, and he may not get any big return. Therefore, if you observe carefully, there is no need to put money in all three bets. You should put it in any one or two. The person who places the bet must decide what his financial situation and strategy will be. There is no way to avoid the risk in placing bets.

[Sandra_hakeem]

What do you think?

I think it's just BS. It’s kind of like thinking that if you bet on red and black in roulette, you’ll end up winning. If you bet on every possible outcome, you’re missing the point that the bookmakers have set the odds so that you’ll lose even in that scenario. So, I agree with Orpichukwu. You are not increasing your chances, you are increasing the cost.

Let's put this into perspective; in a single ticket or a parley (in sport games where there are a lot of options) let's assume the bookies offer 200+ options for a special sports game, then each option gets a dollar bet on a 1.50 odds, equals $200, how many of those options are featured on the winning board? Maybe 30. Each $1 ticket on a 1.50 odd will not pay anything more than $1.50, which means $33 minus tax (could even be less). What stupid way to waste money!

[junder]

This is nothing more than increasing the bet amount while it’s true that if you win, the payout might increase as well, the risk remains the same so there’s still no clear guarantee of success. However, it can be said that this also depends on our skills and the analysis we conduct, because I firmly believe that the odds of winning in sports betting can be improved if we possess the necessary skills to help us.

[Bitcoin.com97]

You many end up losing all , because placing the game multiple times may not increase your chances of winning but lose , that strategy doesn’t guarantee winning but sometimes taking such risk could also be profitable if luck is on your side , so it’s not actually advisable for gambler to not indulge in such .

And that will be one of the most painful things. You know, when someone has made all the plans thinking they have found a perfect way to win, but even after all the effort, the increased risk and later ending up losing all three bets with all the amount put into it, it will only give the person back the sense of thinking about the aftermath instead of just focusing on the winning side.

That strategy is very dangerous and painful thing ,I tried something like that few months ago , it’s just 5 different matches , the once with the lower odd are more likely to win from my analysis, so I had to give winning to those once with small odd them place it , then that same match I still predicted , 0.5 and 1.5 with that same game but I end up having cut one and one of the games couldn’t even score one goal , so that strategy is risky .

[bakasabo]

If I get it right, then the question is if 3 bets on same event (on team A, team B, draw) can bring profit? If earning would be that easy, there were no casino today, as they would go bankrupt. There aint fools among casino owners and employees. They wont allow such strategy to bring money. Look at odds. One will always be below 2. If you place same amount on each bet, there is 33% chance that you will be in a loss. Nevertheless, I think casino script wont just accept all 3 bets.

[eisen33]

If I get it right, then the question is if 3 bets on same event (on team A, team B, draw) can bring profit? If earning would be that easy, there were no casino today, as they would go bankrupt. There aint fools among casino owners and employees. They wont allow such strategy to bring money. Look at odds. One will always be below 2. If you place same amount on each bet, there is 33% chance that you will be in a loss. Nevertheless, I think casino script wont just accept all 3 bets.

It’s not entirely clear what the OP meant when talking about three different bets. I doubt they were referring to betting on each team and the draw, because that would be pointless and would almost certainly mean that two of the bets lose, so that approach wouldn’t work.

I think the OP meant placing three different bets from the same match market, but on a single game. I’m not sure how much sense that makes either. If you’re going to combine bets like that, it might be better to use a bet builder to create a stronger combined odds selection from one match. I’ve tried it a few times myself, and this type of betting doesn’t really suit me.

[Bitcoin.com97]

You many end up losing all , because placing the game multiple times may not increase your chances of winning but lose , that strategy doesn’t guarantee winning but sometimes taking such risk could also be profitable if luck is on your side , so it’s not actually advisable for gambler to not indulge in such .

I can't do such, it's the worst strategy I can take, so if I include this same club into 3 different tickets because I trust them enough just for it to destroy all my tickets, I can't do that.

I've experienced many of this kind of predictions, it's not always end well, it brings disaster to tickets many times.

That is why I said it’s not advisable to do such , it’s very risky, but because gambling is purely on luck , so sometimes one can be lucky  to win such , but in other to be in a safer side,  it’s better you don’t try it , winning it’s based on luck, loses is even more than winning in gambling, so I don’t see a reason to take such risk, imagine even having one bad egg in you games , like 3 different games , and it cut, all your tickets are gone ,because of one match , it’s better one don’t take such risks .

[shawonngp]

I applied your method many years ago. Still, it is a very bad decision because if you make 3 different bets for one team, then at the end of the day you will have a lot of loss, because you cannot win 3 bets at the same time, since the odds are low, you will lose, I think that taking 3 bets for the same team means that you can easily increase the amount of your loss by 3 times, it is a very bad strategy. Casino bookmakers do a lot of research based odds calculation, so no matter what method you follow, if you follow this way, your loss is guaranteed.

[Frankolala]

Of course, before I should be placing this type of bet it would assumed that only what I can afford to lose that I would be regularly using. Such amount could be split into 3 different places to place bet on them and whichever that manages to enter then I will recover it from the other bet without entirely losing the three bet spontaneously.
Do I say this is trial by error method. But often one could end up winning or losing.

I think the best way should be splitting your bet into two. You bet on the favorite club to win the game and also on the underdog to win the game. There's no way that one of your bet wouldn't favor you and you wouldn't lose woefully like that. However, if it happens that the underdog wins, you will make more money.

[Zigabel]

Although, I think this is just for a test run, perhaps I haven't tried it before but I want to know if anyone out there has already tried this methods and it works for them.
For instance;
You can have a two powerful team playing match today, and you selected a single bet and places three different bet both teams with the mindset that they would definitely win at last.
Do you think this could boost the way we gamble, let say to give us more winning results.

What do you think?

There are one of three major things that happens in every game, it is either the team is wining, loosing or its a draw. so if you place different bets on each of these options, you are most likely going to win one. but it will have to be about five separate bets if you are making single picks, that way you can be sure to win at least one game. but due to the odd difference, it may not get you to win a good sum, it is not a very profitable way to gamble but one sue way to win a game.

[Wakate]

Of course, before I should be placing this type of bet it would assumed that only what I can afford to lose that I would be regularly using. Such amount could be split into 3 different places to place bet on them and whichever that manages to enter then I will recover it from the other bet without entirely losing the three bet spontaneously.
Do I say this is trial by error method. But often one could end up winning or losing.

I think the best way should be splitting your bet into two. You bet on the favorite club to win the game and also on the underdog to win the game. There's no way that one of your bet wouldn't favor you and you wouldn't lose woefully like that. However, if it happens that the underdog wins, you will make more money.

The idea of splitting the bets into two is okay and understandable and this can be profitable when it is done in a smart way.
I have understood one thing about gambling, using one strategy wik not always give you that profit you are looking for and it's better for you to divide your bets into different bets so that you can stake them and anyone of them can make you profitable.

[Lida93]

Either you end up winning two bets, or you end up losing two. There's no trick to it, and it ain't even a strategy.

... Or you can end at losing all the three bets which is why I wouldn't either consider this to be a safety net strategy for recovery of one lose with another bet won in respect to the 3 bets placed. Betting in such a way can make the gambler lose much funds in quick time, ash e can go at 3 different sessions and losing each session which makes it 9 bets lost in just 3 sessions. I think some strategies looks attractive until you put them into practice and you'll find how flawed they are.

[AmoreJaz]

I applied your method many years ago. Still, it is a very bad decision because if you make 3 different bets for one team, then at the end of the day you will have a lot of loss, because you cannot win 3 bets at the same time, since the odds are low, you will lose, I think that taking 3 bets for the same team means that you can easily increase the amount of your loss by 3 times, it is a very bad strategy. Casino bookmakers do a lot of research based odds calculation, so no matter what method you follow, if you follow this way, your loss is guaranteed.

Or better yet, bet on different betting lines, with the same teams involved. Because in every game, there are so many betting lines that you can place with. But make sure, you know your chances before you place each bet. As we know our strengths in predicting for each betting line, i.e. the over and under, which round, etc., we already have idea which lines have higher chances of winning.

This technique, I believe, depends on your familiarity with the team. But yes, you are just increasing your percentage of loss here if in case you didn't get it right. So need to think of the repercussion of your bets especially if you are in tight budget or you are not very well-versed of the sports.