Linking KasyNoir to Other Online Casino Platforms

[albon]

Hey everyone, I wanted to create this thread because I did some research a little while ago. After I came across a new signature campaign -> [OPEN] KasyNoir Casino Signature Campaign - $10 USDT - BSC/week ⚡️ launched by @TheAndy500.

Well, I found on the anti-money laundering page that they're using Directive 2001/97/EC? This is the European Union's Second Anti-Money Laundering Directive. The surprising thing is that this directive has been superseded for years.

Also on the same page, there's this sentence: "the Company is entitled to cancel effettuate.In betting event." The word "effettuate" is Italian, which suggests that the text was copied from an Italian gambling site and then poorly machine-translated.



Another thing I noticed is that websites like Vegascamel.com and Niagarajackpot.com use the exact same template. They also share the same outdated European legal text, the same Italian word ^{[1] [2]}, and even the same predatory deposit requirements for withdrawals.




I analyzed the source code (DOM) of all three websites. [kasynoir.com] + [vegascamel.com] + [niagarajackpot.com]

They all use a payment system called Rex Cash, and All three sites use a leaked version of the Sirplay betting engine.

They all pull brand images from the same S3 bucket: https://sirplay-amazon.s3-eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/

The most damning evidence is the shared HASHKEY_CRYPTO: 2e35f242a46d67eeb74aabc37d5e5d05 [Sharing a unique HASHKEY_CRYPTO across KasyNoir, Vegascamel, and Niagarajackpot is technical proof that they’re all tied to the same server and operator.]

I’m posting this thread just to highlight what I’ve found, and I hope their representative on the forum will come and address these points. @Kasynoir | ANN +  | ANN

---------------------------------

[1] kasynoir.com | WHOIS | AGE: 7 Months 5 Days | ARCHIVED

Domain: kasynoir.com
Registered On: 2025-08-27
Expires On: 2026-08-27
Updated On:2025-09-10
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC

[2] niagarajackpot.com | WHOIS AGE: 1 Year 2 Months 4 Days | ARCHIVED

Domain: niagarajackpot.com
Registered On: 2025-01-28
Expires On: 2027-01-28
Updated On: 2026-01-28
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC

[3] vegascamel.com | WHOIS AGE: 1 Year 9 Months 4 Days | ARCHIVED

Domain: vegascamel.com
Registered On: 2024-06-28
Expires On: 2026-06-28
Updated On: 2025-07-08
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC

--------------------------------------------
While I was putting this together, I stumbled upon a post by @Zwei that confirmed my worst suspicions. He found that KasyNoir, NiagaraJackpot and mybitcoin.casino are actually registered under the exact same license number: ALSI-202504036-FI2.

i like how OP goes on answering others but ignored responding to this, hmm... i wonder why? maybe because i was right?
they even link to where they got the script from in the footer: https://sirplay.com/online-casino-software/

and i took a better look at their license, and it's just a service that sirplay provides where they add the domain of their clients under theirs.



tbh, this intire thing looks like some amature with a bit of money trying to run a casino to make some quick bucks, so i'll be carfull depositing and playing here.

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

[Zwei]

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

that's what i think as well, but it could also be multiple people using the same casino service provider who setup and manage those websites for them, but regardless i would not trust them with a single penny.

from what you found, the signature campaign, and them pushing a 40% revshare, it's like they are begging people to promote them.
there are too many red flags to ignore, and i know for a fact they are broke and have no money or business to be running a casino. not to mention if the slots are nulled just like the script they are using, they ain't gonna be paying anyone.

so i would not play on any of those sites, anyone who does is gonna be donating money to them.

[AakZaki]

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

I think you're right about one single operator running multiple skins. I also noticed that it was not normal, When Most Casinos opened a signature campaign with an allocation of more than 1000$ in a week.
   
KasyNoir only allocates 100$ in a week, this looks like a poor Casino. which could be an exit scam in the end. I just found out that there is such a poor casino.
Based on all your findings about this casino, it should be unbelievable because the strangeness is obvious.


I also see from the manager's side, if this is a serious casino to develop, they should hire a much more experienced manager. However what I noticed was that this Casino looks like hiring a Manager at a lower cost.

[Kasynoir]

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

that's what i think as well, but it could also be multiple people using the same casino service provider who setup and manage those websites for them, but regardless i would not trust them with a single penny.

from what you found, the signature campaign, and them pushing a 40% revshare, it's like they are begging people to promote them.
there are too many red flags to ignore, and i know for a fact they are broke and have no money or business to be running a casino. not to mention if the slots are nulled just like the script they are using, they ain't gonna be paying anyone.

so i would not play on any of those sites, anyone who does is gonna be donating money to them.

We respect your opinion, but we strongly disagree with your assumptions. Making such claims without any real evidence is not appropriate.
We are a legitimate project, currently growing and investing in building a long-term platform. Like many new brands, we are working on expanding our affiliate network and visibility, which is completely normal in this industry.
Regarding payments and operations, we take transparency and user experience very seriously. If there are any concerns, we are always open to address them with real data rather than speculation.
Constructive feedback is always welcome, but spreading unverified accusations does not help anyone.

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

I think you're right about one single operator running multiple skins. I also noticed that it was not normal, When Most Casinos opened a signature campaign with an allocation of more than 1000$ in a week.
   
KasyNoir only allocates 100$ in a week, this looks like a poor Casino. which could be an exit scam in the end. I just found out that there is such a poor casino.
Based on all your findings about this casino, it should be unbelievable because the strangeness is obvious.
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/04/02/UYSq7q.png

I also see from the manager's side, if this is a serious casino to develop, they should hire a much more experienced manager. However what I noticed was that this Casino looks like hiring a Manager at a lower cost.

We understand your concerns, but your conclusions are based on assumptions rather than facts.
We are a new project, and like any new business, we are starting with controlled budgets to test performance and optimize our strategy before scaling. This is a conscious and professional decision, not a sign of weakness.
Regarding the campaign and management, we are currently exploring different options and testing what works best for our platform. We are new to Bitcointalk, and we are learning and adapting step by step.
Building a brand takes time, consistency, and smart allocation of resources. We prefer to grow sustainably rather than overspend without proven results.
If you have constructive suggestions, we are open to hearing them. Otherwise, we prefer to focus on facts and real performance rather than speculation.

[Kasynoir]

In the end, what do you think about what I found? Does this seem normal? To me, it's definitely one single operator running multiple skins.

that's what i think as well, but it could also be multiple people using the same casino service provider who setup and manage those websites for them, but regardless i would not trust them with a single penny.

from what you found, the signature campaign, and them pushing a 40% revshare, it's like they are begging people to promote them.
there are too many red flags to ignore, and i know for a fact they are broke and have no money or business to be running a casino. not to mention if the slots are nulled just like the script they are using, they ain't gonna be paying anyone.

so i would not play on any of those sites, anyone who does is gonna be donating money to them.

We’re seeing a lot of assumptions and speculation here, but very little actual evidence. Making claims like this without proof is not only misleading, but also harmful.
We are a new brand operating with a clear strategy: controlled budgets, real testing, and sustainable growth. Not every project needs to burn thousands of dollars per week to prove legitimacy. In fact, smart cost management is part of building a long-term business.
Offering a 40% revshare is a standard model in the industry, not a ‘red flag’. It simply reflects a performance-based approach rather than upfront spending.
As for the claims about being “broke” or unable to pay players, these are completely unfounded. We process withdrawals and operate with real providers. Anyone making such statements should be prepared to back them with facts.
If you have real concerns, we’re open to discussing them transparently. Otherwise, spreading unverified accusations only damages the credibility of the discussion, not our project.

[memehunter]

@Kasynoir, we have crossed path on telegram, and you can see all of my concerns are being actualized here. First of all, please do a little more research about this place and its standards. It is not any like any other cheap marketing platform, this is Bitcointalk and have the capacity of easily making or breaking any brand who comes here.
First of all please read proper posting antiquates and avoid consecutive posts in a row.
Second of all please don't use AI generated generalized replies when interacting with wise members of this forum, it can get you in a real trouble and possibly affect your account here.


         

[AakZaki]

We’re seeing a lot of assumptions and speculation here, but very little actual evidence. Making claims like this without proof is not only misleading, but also harmful.

-snip-

At first I thought you would refute the OP accusations first, but it turns out that you prefer to refute Zwei and Me's statement.

If I make an analogy related to your site is kasynoir, niagarajackpot and vegascamel that are registered under the same license, it is like Three farm account asking for a loan from the same lender, then When all three get a loan and it is found that the account is connected they run away without paying the loan. That's roughly the analogy.

After all, your site looks like a copy and paste scrypt, how maybe I would trust your site.
As a form of anticipation and reminder for potential users so I assume and it's worth considering.

The question is, why don't you refute the OP accusations that are very clear about the weirdness of your site?

[Kasynoir]

@memehunter, let’s keep this professional. I understand you might be upset because I decided to work with someone else instead of you, but this thread is not about you. If you have something to discuss, you can message me privately or continue on Telegram.


@AakZaki, from my perspective, the person who opened this discussion didn’t make accusations, but pointed out some things that could be improved — things that I myself was not aware of. Our website was developed by a provider (Sirplay, as you’ve noticed). Kasynoir has nothing to do with the other sites mentioned, I don’t know who manages them or even if they are still active, and honestly, it’s not relevant to us.
What matters to me is building and protecting my brand, Kasynoir. I won’t accept claims like “they have no money” or “they don’t pay” coming from people who haven’t even tried the platform — these are simply unfounded accusations.
That being said, this will be my last reply here. I have a reputation to build and I need to focus on growing and improving my business. You are free to continue speculating about whether we are legit or not, but those will remain just words unless you actually test Kasynoir.

[yahoo62278]

@Kasynoir, we have crossed path on telegram, and you can see all of my concerns are being actualized here. First of all, please do a little more research about this place and its standards. It is not any like any other cheap marketing platform, this is Bitcointalk and have the capacity of easily making or breaking any brand who comes here.
First of all please read proper posting antiquates and avoid consecutive posts in a row.
Second of all please don't use AI generated generalized replies when interacting with wise members of this forum, it can get you in a real trouble and possibly affect your account here.


         

Just simply speaking about the bolded part, you are implying that a brand must spend thousands to be successful? If so, that simply isn't true. A business is allowed to use whatever weekly budget they want and ire whatever manager they want whether they be experienced or not. Just because a business comes in here and spends $100k doesn't mean they will be a super successful business. It just means they spent a lot of money. A business is as successful as it's product. If the product sucks, noone will visit more then once.

I would recommend that a business consider a minimum $500 weekly budget, but they're allowed to spend their money how they wish.

[memehunter]

@memehunter, let’s keep this professional. I understand you might be upset because I decided to work with someone else instead of you, but this thread is not about you. If you have something to discuss, you can message me privately or continue on Telegram.

LOL, dont ever think for a second that I am mad. I am a forum member as well, and just expressed my opinions as we are sharing common platform and I understand the confidential matters as well. You thinking this way is highly unprofessional. Please get used to for listening valid criticism, as I have said this place is not like other cheap places where you can have your way with couple of thousands (couple of hundreds in you case). 

you are implying that a brand must spend thousands to be successful?

NO, but sometimes some offerings, if you compare it to other serious brands, scream the other things. If a casino is placing its signature association with that low of a prize, it is a bad first impression. Only low quality and low effort spammers will be comfortable with such pay rates, I would personally prefer to remain signature less than accepting such insulting payrates. a 20%/30% lower market payrates are understandable for strategic reasons but this is simply outrageous.

I would recommend that a business consider a minimum $500 weekly budget, but they're allowed to spend their money how they wish.

You know much better than me as this is your expertise. 

[albon]

Making such claims without any real evidence is not appropriate.

I already showed proof here. you still didn’t respond to any of the points I mentioned.

So explain this the existence of the same HASHKEY_CRYPTO and the same license number [ALSI-202504036-FI2] for three different sites if you are not one operator? Instead of accusing me of making claims, show a explanation for these impossible coincidences.

we take transparency and user experience very seriously.

As a long-time member here, I know very well that any platform claiming transparency doesn't copy Italian legal texts like "effettuate" or use European laws from 2001 that have since been repealed. That alone shows the platform is merely a pre-made skin.

We prefer to grow sustainably rather than overspend without proven results.
If you have constructive suggestions, we are open to hearing them. Otherwise, we prefer to focus on facts and real performance rather than speculation.

Sustainable growth does not mean paying trivial amounts that only attract fake accounts as this with coupled with the use of a leaked Sirplay script, Makes it even more suspicious that the goal is to collect deposits and disappear at the lowest possible cost.

Kasynoir has nothing to do with the other sites mentioned, I don’t know who manages them or even if they are still active.

If you don't know the other sites, how your sites having the exact same license number and the same hashkey? This that shows, that they sounds like one operation to me

I won’t accept claims like “they have no money” or “they don’t pay” coming from people who haven’t even tried the platform — these are simply unfounded accusations.

We here follow this -> [Don't Trust, Verify]. Real evidence such as a leaked script, a shared license, and plagiarized legal texts is what determines trust . We don't gamble with our money just to test your integrity.

from my perspective, the person who opened this discussion didn’t make accusations, but pointed out some things that could be improved — things that I myself was not aware of.

That being said, this will be my last reply here.

You just admitted of your ignorance regarding your own legal framework and you withdrew from the discussion without explaining the technical connection related to Hashkey with other sites, and this confirms to everyone that Looks like a clone platform.

I am giving you exactly one hour to come up with a valid response. Otherwise, I’ll just to tag your account with a negative rating to warn anyone thinking of using this. I will not wait for you to vanish with people's funds.

[robelneo]

Making such claims without any real evidence is not appropriate.

I already showed proof here. you still didn’t respond to any of the points I mentioned.

Kasynoir is accusing you of having no real evidence, but the evidence is very real, and he is trying to accuse some of us of holding a grudge because of the marketing delegation.

Kasynoir should just directly address these issues Linking KasyNoir to Other Online Casino Platforms
Great job, brother Albon, for having keen eyes for detail; you really have good experience exposing anomalies like this.

[Kasynoir]

Let’s bring this discussion back to facts instead of assumptions.

First of all: having the same hashkey or similar technical references does NOT automatically mean it’s “one single operation.” Anyone with even basic knowledge of this industry knows that many operators work under sublicensing / white-label setups, relying on third-party providers. That’s exactly our case, and we’ve never claimed to be an “in-house” casino.

We clearly operate using an external provider (Sirplay), which supplies the platform, infrastructure, and services. Because of that, some technical elements can be shared across different operators. That’s normal in this space.

Second point: you keep saying “clone platform” and “leaked script,” but you haven’t provided any actual technical proof. Saying “it looks like” or “it sounds like” is not evidence. If you have a real technical analysis (code, endpoints, backend structure), feel free to share it. Otherwise, these are just assumptions.

Third: about the legal texts. You mentioned things like wording (“effettuate”) or outdated laws as if that alone proves something. In reality, many white-label platforms use standard legal templates that get adapted. Again, that’s not proof of fraud.

Now the key point:

You’re making accusations, while at the same time supporting or referencing platforms that appear unlicensed or not verifiable.

Based on available checks:

Curaçao eGaming shows the domain as unlicensed

https://i.ibb.co/FbrqTkft/1000056098.jpg

Antillephone cannot verify the license and even flags possible misuse

https://i.ibb.co/21fWjkLq/1000056099.jpg

So the real question is simple:
where is the valid seal? where is the official working verification?


Because before accusing others, there should be solid ground on your own side.

We have nothing to do with other sites. We manage only our own platform. The fact that a provider is used by multiple operators does not mean there is some hidden single operation — it’s simply how this industry works.

Let’s keep it simple: less speculation, more real evidence.
If you have concrete technical proof, share it. Otherwise, this is just noise.

[albon]

Earlier, you claimed:

Kasynoir has nothing to do with the other sites mentioned, I don’t know who manages them or even if they are still active, and honestly, it’s not relevant to us.

BUT NOW you admit to being a White-label and sharing the same infrastructure and Hashkey.

First of all: having the same hashkey or similar technical references does NOT automatically mean it’s “one single operation.” Anyone with even basic knowledge of this industry knows that many operators work under sublicensing / white-label setups, relying on third-party providers. That’s exactly our case.

Your admission of being a White-label that shares the exact same HASHKEY_CRYPTO and the same license number with multiple other sites proves that you are a single operation running under different names. This type of duplication is the primary hallmark of Clone Scams designed for mass-deployment at the lowest possible cost before exit scam.

We clearly operate using an external provider (Sirplay), which supplies the platform, infrastructure, and services. Because of that, some technical elements can be shared across different operators. That’s normal in this space.

This is another admission from you that you are using Sirplay. Fine, if that’s the case, can you provide us with an official verification link from the parent company [Sirplay] that confirms you are indeed a legitimate client of theirs?

Third: about the legal texts. You mentioned things like wording (“effettuate”) or outdated laws as if that alone proves something. In reality, many white-label platforms use standard legal templates that get adapted. Again, that’s not proof of fraud.

The presence of the word 'effettuate' and rules from 2001 proves that you are simply copy-paste of outdated project, and this in itself is evidence of a lack of transparency.

You’re making accusations, while at the same time supporting or referencing platforms that appear unlicensed or not verifiable.
Based on available checks:
Curaçao eGaming shows the domain as unlicensed

What does any of that have to do with the issue at hand? In this thread, we are discussing Kasynoir. The images you provided are completely off-topic and do not change the fact that your site uses plagiarized Italian legal texts and European laws that were repealed back in 2001.

-----------------------------------

Kasynoir is accusing you of having no real evidence, but the evidence is very real, and he is trying to accuse some of us of holding a grudge because of the marketing delegation.

Kasynoir should just directly address these issues Linking KasyNoir to Other Online Casino Platforms
Great job, brother Albon, for having keen eyes for detail; you really have good experience exposing anomalies like this.

Thanks brother robelneo, appreciate the support.

Everything is already archived on urlscan.io anyway, so anyone can check it themselves.

[Kasynoir]

Earlier, you claimed:

Kasynoir has nothing to do with the other sites mentioned, I don’t know who manages them or even if they are still active, and honestly, it’s not relevant to us.

BUT NOW you admit to being a White-label and sharing the same infrastructure and Hashkey.

First of all: having the same hashkey or similar technical references does NOT automatically mean it’s “one single operation.” Anyone with even basic knowledge of this industry knows that many operators work under sublicensing / white-label setups, relying on third-party providers. That’s exactly our case.

Your admission of being a White-label that shares the exact same HASHKEY_CRYPTO and the same license number with multiple other sites proves that you are a single operation running under different names. This type of duplication is the primary hallmark of Clone Scams designed for mass-deployment at the lowest possible cost before exit scam.

We clearly operate using an external provider (Sirplay), which supplies the platform, infrastructure, and services. Because of that, some technical elements can be shared across different operators. That’s normal in this space.

This is another admission from you that you are using Sirplay. Fine, if that’s the case, can you provide us with an official verification link from the parent company [Sirplay] that confirms you are indeed a legitimate client of theirs?

Third: about the legal texts. You mentioned things like wording (“effettuate”) or outdated laws as if that alone proves something. In reality, many white-label platforms use standard legal templates that get adapted. Again, that’s not proof of fraud.

The presence of the word 'effettuate' and rules from 2001 proves that you are simply copy-paste of outdated project, and this in itself is evidence of a lack of transparency.

You’re making accusations, while at the same time supporting or referencing platforms that appear unlicensed or not verifiable.
Based on available checks:
Curaçao eGaming shows the domain as unlicensed

What does any of that have to do with the issue at hand? In this thread, we are discussing Kasynoir. The images you provided are completely off-topic and do not change the fact that your site uses plagiarized Italian legal texts and European laws that were repealed back in 2001.

-----------------------------------

Kasynoir is accusing you of having no real evidence, but the evidence is very real, and he is trying to accuse some of us of holding a grudge because of the marketing delegation.

Kasynoir should just directly address these issues Linking KasyNoir to Other Online Casino Platforms
Great job, brother Albon, for having keen eyes for detail; you really have good experience exposing anomalies like this.

Thanks brother robelneo, appreciate the support.

Everything is already archived on urlscan.io anyway, so anyone can check it themselves.

You’re making a logical leap that simply isn’t supported by facts.

Using a white-label or third-party provider does not mean “single operation” — it means shared infrastructure. That’s a standard model used across the entire industry. The presence of similar technical elements (like hashkeys or internal references) is exactly what you would expect in that setup.

You are presenting this as “proof”, but in reality it’s just an assumption without any technical demonstration.

If you want to claim this is a single operation, then provide actual evidence:
- shared ownership
- shared backend control
- financial or operational linkage

Without that, repeating “same hashkey = same operator” is not proof.

Regarding Sirplay — we already stated clearly that we use a third-party provider. That’s not an “admission”, it’s transparency. Many operators rely on providers, and those providers do not publicly list or verify every client individually.

As for the legal text argument: pointing to a single word or outdated reference does not demonstrate fraud. At most, it shows that templates were used or not fully updated — which is a common issue, not evidence of a scam.

Finally, dismissing licensing inconsistencies as “off-topic” is convenient, but not valid. Licensing and verification are directly related to trust, which is exactly what this discussion is about.

So again, if there is real evidence, present it. Otherwise, these are interpretations, not facts.

[WeLiveCrypto]

It is not any like any other cheap marketing platform, this is Bitcointalk and have the capacity of easily making or breaking any brand who comes here.          

We are trying to understand the marketing standards in this community.

KasyNoir’s marketing budget is $100 to $150 per week, whereas b1ack Exchange’s budget is $5,000 to $10,000 per week. Do you think KasyNoir will fail and that b1ack Exchange will eventually become successful?

In case you are not aware, b1ack Exchange was capitalized with a substantial amount of funds derived from carding activities and stolen virtual credit cards (VCCs). To obscure the origins of these illicit funds, they utilized THORChain liquidity, We have not followed them recently, but they may still be using THORChain to clean their funds and using the exchange platform to recover the fees they are losing. A similar approach was reportedly used by the ByBit hacker. It will be interesting to observe how long b1ack Exchange can conceal these activities from the Bitcoin community while continuing its operations.

So far, the significant investment in marketing is protecting b1ack Exchange, but since KasyNoir does not have such a budget, they are failing to get away with it. We are not advocating for KasyNoir or b1ack Exchange; we are simply trying to understand the standards that are practiced in this community.

[albon]

[all talk, no proof]

looks like you’re trying to avoid the purchase of the script via the Validator link.

Anyway, I gave you negative feedback just to warn others from your clone site. the fact that they all match the license number, hashtag, and an old script no way that’s random; it's hard to ignore. as for your point about the template, are you joking? This isn't a template error; it's proof that the site was created by "copying and pasting" a very old code to launch the site at the lowest possible cost.

Regardless, that’s enough digging for me, doesn’t need more explanation.

also, I sent a message to @TheAndy500 on the forum to stop the signature campaign promoting your site. This is to protect his reputation and to prevent members from being exposed to a platform that could disappear at any moment and turn into an exit scam.

[Kasynoir]

[all talk, no proof]

looks like you’re trying to avoid the purchase of the script via the Validator link.

Anyway, I gave you negative feedback just to warn others from your clone site. the fact that they all match the license number, hashtag, and an old script no way that’s random; it's hard to ignore. as for your point about the template, are you joking? This isn't a template error; it's proof that the site was created by "copying and pasting" a very old code to launch the site at the lowest possible cost.

Regardless, that’s enough digging for me, doesn’t need more explanation.

also, I sent a message to @TheAndy500 on the forum to stop the signature campaign promoting your site. This is to protect his reputation and to prevent members from being exposed to a platform that could disappear at any moment and turn into an exit scam.

I provided actual, verifiable evidence — including screenshots from official verification systems showing that the platform you are referencing has an unclear or invalid licensing status.

That’s not interpretation, that’s observable data.

At the same time, your entire argument is based on assumptions:
you see shared elements and immediately conclude “same operation” without demonstrating any real technical or operational link.

So on one side, there is documented evidence.
On the other, there are conclusions without proof.

And despite that, you chose to leave negative feedback and escalate the situation.

If the goal is really to protect users, then the same level of scrutiny should be applied consistently — including to the platforms you are referencing.

Otherwise, it starts to look less like an objective warning and more like a selective narrative.

[memehunter]

KasyNoir’s marketing budget is $100 to $150 per week, whereas b1ack Exchange’s budget is $5,000 to $10,000 per week. Do you think KasyNoir will fail and that b1ack Exchange will eventually become successful?

You are trying to make correlation which I did not say. I never said that having more budget will be the sure shot recipe of successful marketing. My contention was you are offering signature campaign for your brand at dirt cheap rates which shows, how you value the BTT members and this platform. You have low budget ($100), no issue offer it to 1-3 quality Sr members instead of doing 10.
Why do you think other managers don't do that? Imagine Rainbet decreasing payrates and instead of hiring 150 members hire 1500 for same pay.
IMO, they should have host a contest or may be something else with that amount of money.
But I get that this type of spam marketing is common on many other platforms but this place deserves a bit more respect.