Application for removal of red trust

[vanesha]

Please remove the red marks, because there is no strong evidence, the Dts give marks as they please.

Problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579485.0

[_act_]

You abused merits and also cheating in in campaign with alts. You were noticed, brought out to people about what you have been doing with alts and it led to negative feedbacks from three people, making 4 valid negative trusts from 4 people.

Also you are not pleading but you said the DTs give marks as they pleased. This is enough to let us know that you do not agree with the DT members that you did something wrong.

Just forget about the tags to be removed. There is not good reasons the tags will be removed.

[Upgrade00]

2/3 of the users that left you a negative feedback are active on that thread where it all started. You do not need to create another thread to get their attention. They are the only ones that can remove the the if they see a good reason to, s continue the conversation.

Chances of that happening is very low. There is evidence of connection and other evidence of abuse of local boards.

[Vod]

the Dts give marks as they please.

Do you have any strong evidence of this?   I have a neurolink implant that reacts to a community API.  I'm not able to control leaving the trust or what I write.  :/

[Free Market Capitalist]

This plan to request the removal of the Red Trust network based solely on the argument that the DTs “give marks as they please” is brilliant. Just as brilliant as the OP's merit-to-activity ratio. But this thread is yet another example of this account's efforts. It aims to achieve things on the forum with minimal effort, but this time it's not going to work out.

[hugeblack]

All you need to do is provide evidence denying your connection to @diminizio, or at least respond to those accusations, not just say "there is no strong evidence." If you do this, negative trust will be removed; otherwise, your account will be ignored.

[FinneysTrueVision]

You denied having any connections to diminizio or Dr.Osh, but I believe you are not being honest. Your account and diminizio’s account were registered within two days of each other. Both accounts woke up and changed passwords two days apart in 2019. In 2021, both accounts woke up on the same day, three minutes apart from each other.

You have previously received funds from Dr.Osh. One transaction isn’t enough to determine if that is one of your alts, but at the very least it shows you already know each other, and seeing how you were both doing similar things, it’s possible there was some level of collusion.

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x1861322f15e7204ad0a7773f22227403461b212ed43114308b8d80dfe25c8050

[JollyGood]

I have read your replies in that particular thread and though you seem to be making a passionate defence, the reality is you have not really made much difference. If you knew conducting in a suspicious manner with accounts that already had been noticed would attract attention to yourself, why did you do it?

Keeping that aside, how many accounts you are operating in the forum?

Please remove the red marks, because there is no strong evidence, the Dts give marks as they please.

Problem
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579485.0

[examplens]

All you need to do is provide evidence denying your connection to @diminizio, or at least respond to those accusations, not just say "there is no strong evidence." If you do this, negative trust will be removed; otherwise, your account will be ignored.

It's interesting that he didn't bother to give any explanation at all. Probably because he is currently in the Bitz signature campaign, so from that point of view, his position is "safe". I am sure that the moment he is done with the Bitz campaign, he will come here and try to give explanations.