Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance

[Sandra_hakeem]

Yeah, dark times. I must have lost thousands of dollars at the time from unrealized Chipmixer payouts. Still lives rent-free in my head

Dark times!! Particularly because it was their peak on the forum. Get over it!

So anyway, what's your backstory? I would like to know.

He obviously doesn't want to succumb to all these interviews. Personally, this is not important.
Edit:

Am I the only one wondering why this particular cat hasn't made any sort of, "Guten Tag, allerseits. Ich bin zurück!", in the local board he was most known for posting in?

Let's keep our fingers crossed. The heat on it is already too much.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I'm hereby starting Bitcointalk defensive Alliance, where we are founding a strong defensive Organisation on Bitcointalk.
It is ment to protect its members against unjustified negative Trust and other cyberbullying.

~

~

The are no rules exept the guide from LoyceV about how to leave trust.
The alliance is rather ment a defensive one, which should protect against unjustified feedbacks simply to make it unattractive to unfairly accuses and unjustified negative trust.

~

In general my comment back then was more meant as an advice, where I might double up on some Merit, especially for new, helpful topics but I can't act like a Merit source for so many topics in your local board, where I don't understand your language (Pidgin) entirely. Looks like we got a little misunderstanding here.

But I'm sure it's a helpful topic and your local board members will appreciate it and / or future Nigerian local board Merit sources might be happy to have your topic.

@1miau we have always gotten along very well and had great PM conversations. I never had any reason to distrust you and in fact I know some very noble things about you. One detail that caught my attention was the "spelling mistake" of the word "meant" and I know you don't misspell this word usually. Now this does not seem to be a mistake since you repeated it twice, unless your "a"-key is broken, but since you are using it for other words, this coincidence can be safely ruled out.

Again, you never gave me a reason to doubt you, but why the hell are you getting the word "meant" wrong twice?

I may again seem too picky about one local partition, but there is always an opportunity to make sure that who and which local partition makes a similar mistake. Just use these parameters to check the word "ment," at least for a period of two years, and if you remove the excess, you can see who writes this way most often.

https://bitlist.co/search?content=ment&date_min=2024-05-01&date_max=2026-05-03&limit=20

My guess is that the account has changed ownership, and the owner is now exactly where this error is most popular.

By the way, "1miau" himself has already corrected this error, which means that he has accepted his mistake.

[Cricktor]

Bitcointalk Account name:
Reson why you are eligible to joine here:

I'm probably what you can call a spelling nazi and the obvious spelling errors practically jumped out at me (both words highlighted by me). It's maybe another oddity but frankly I didn't pay much attention to 1miau's posts outside of German local board, at least I don't remember that he had English spelling issues.

I'm mildly "sensitive" to spelling errors, that's why they catch my attention a bit.

The (less for me) funny part is that some, cough, if not all applicants copied the spelling errors verbatim. Well...  

Just wanted to point out this additional quirk. It's no elefant in the room, though, I guess.


Regarding the Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance. I don't like this idea at all. I have flashbacks of a retaliation-driven cold-war demagogy. And as pointed out by many others whose resentments I share, it's likely going to be messy.

[bullrun2024bro]

Old 1miau would never make those spelling errors. He called me out for minor errors and even deleted posts in certain threads because of my „Denglish“ (German English).

If he is now making these obvious errors, I am NOT convinced it’s still the same person owning the account.

[MaxMueller]

As spelling seems to be the last remaining "evidence" i want to add the obvious:
-spelling can vary depending on changing habits (desktop vs. mobile use -> sausage fingers writing errors)
-spelling may vary due to less priority (no proofreading)
-Burnout can drastically change writing habits
-Burnout can profoundly change relationships (emotional distance, withdrawal), resulting in a different way of expressing oneself

I can hardly accept such trivial mistakes (as the ones presented here) as "proof of evidence".

~

You should mention that you had a personal feud with him.

[PrivacyG]

I can hardly accept such trivial mistakes (as the ones presented here) as "proof of evidence".

I would not say it is definitive proof, for now it resorts to feelings and belief.  The best evidence right now would be 1miau becoming more active again on the Forum.  An impersonator could only try to pretend for so long.

[JollyGood]

My understanding is that there is momentum gathering in the community. You may have noticed, the 1miau has received some more neutral tags because members believe the person operating the account is not the same person that created it. It might be the case that it was sold or has been given permission to be used by someone else temporarily (but it seems highly unlikely the account has been hacked after verifying a signed a message).

Old 1miau would never make those spelling errors. He called me out for minor errors and even deleted posts in certain threads because of my „Denglish“ (German English).

If he is now making these obvious errors, I am NOT convinced it’s still the same person owning the account.

[lovesmayfamilis]

My understanding is that there is momentum gathering in the community. You may have noticed, the 1miau has received some more neutral tags because members believe the person operating the account is not the same person that created it. It might be the case that it was sold or has been given permission to be used by someone else temporarily (but it seems highly unlikely the account has been hacked after verifying a signed a message).

If the account had been hacked, the owner himself would probably have reported it, provided he was alive and interested in the account. Wouldn't someone who could accidentally lose access to their account do that? We see a lot of requests to restore accounts, even for those with low ranks on the forum.

Therefore, there is no need to talk about hacking. There is a possibility of a friendly transfer or sale, and a change in language and literacy only confirms this. It is not difficult to use German today with the help of translators (only further discussion with those who have previously communicated with him will confirm his full command of it), which cannot be said of the owner's English, since these mistakes may be used in a certain local area. Once again, I suggest comparing this mistake with the posts of those users who make the same mistake and seeing that it was most often made exclusively in the Nigerian section. Besides, everyone remembers that the resurrected account was a very good and kind merit source in the Nigerian section. Likewise, his posts appeared in this section a couple of months before the password change, although of course everyone knows that his posts were translated. https://bitlist.co/search?author=1miau&board_id=275&limit=20&page=4

Also, those cases with the purchased accounts in this section. and the exposure of their local merit source, as well as the alliance that is currently being created, and those participants (who received merit from him) who quickly joined it, do not seem to be coincidences. Let me be a skeptic, but this is not a coincidence.